Australian rugby player Sione Katoa on why he refused a flu shot

NRL star Sione Katoa reveals why he refuses to get the flu shot - and says he won't let any of his three young kids be vaccinated.

“I’ve had a few people contact me and ask why I declined the flu shot and wanted to share my reasons behind it, particularly now with one of our closest mates @brycecartwright6 and teammate Brian being stood down.

Lately I’ve seen journalists, reporters and mainstream media creating a divide between the community, the fans and the NRL by constantly shaming and bullying NRL players and their families who stand for freedom of choice.

We acknowledge that the flu shot has the ability to result in serious adverse reactions and has also claimed lives. In 2018, the step father of a friend sadly passed away within 48 hours of his flu shot. He was an adult man, with no underlying health conditions. What if this were to happen to our family, or yours? Why are people so quick to advocate for “herd immunity” and not acknowledge vaccine injury/death? There are plenty of families within the NRL alone that suffer from vaccine injury.

We used to be very pro-vaxx and judged those who chose not to vaccinate. Those judgements quickly passed as soon as vaccines caused health issues for our eldest son, Chase. He was constantly sick after his shots, resulting in many trips to the hospital and doctors office. Our son was helpless and never getting any better, so we reached out for a second opinion which lead us down the path of holistic health. After seeking advice from medical professionals and seeing the positive impact that it had on our sons health, we made the informed decision to no longer vaccinate ourselves or our children.

Our friends and family who vaccinate themselves and their children respect and understand our decision with vaccination. And we respect theirs. No, they aren’t scared to be around us, our kids play with theirs and we can also have open conversations about vaccines without judgement and that’s how it should be.

We stand for FREEDOM OF CHOICE and what we choose should not be made a public matter and cause outrage in the media and community. Everyone should be entitled to choose what they do, or do not inject into their body because WHEN THERE IS RISK THERE MUST BE CHOICE.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/CAAUtLnFBPb/?igshid=191mepl5bhywl&fbclid=IwAR2I4DcUlqYqxLsGWaX2zBrEIchAqfwNu6jEwdub0JK5GL8gybPaL1paEkk

Are Bill and Melinda Gates Illuminati? MATTHEW WARD

Q. Are Bill and Melinda Gates Illuminati?  They want to vaccinate everyone in Africa and maybe everywhere else—are they really unaware that vaccines are used to spread disease or do they know and are as dark as the people behind it?  

A. They are Illuminati by the power of their money and corporate influence, yes, but by an intention to dominate the world, no.  Bill has been so focused on technology, almost to the exclusion of knowing Illuminati activities other than leadership in governments, mega-corporations and banking, that only recently he became aware of their diabolic motives, including the purpose for mandated vaccinations.  When he learned about the autism-like effects of vaccinations in infants, lab-designed viruses put in vaccines, and programmed microchips in some inoculations, the Gates foundations’ health care funding swiftly but silently changed accordingly.  The Gateses are not dark souls—they were fence-straddlers who ignored the darkness in their affiliations and business dealings, then “saw the light” and now are being guided by conscience.

MATTHEW WARD, through SUZY WARD
https://www.matthewbooks.com/july-15-2006/

Compulsory products

If you want to turn people against a product or service then make it compulsory or bully people into receiving it.

Nobody likes being told what to do or being forced to do or receive something they disagree with. That's a recipe for disaster and for the building of resentment. The end result is the destruction of the credibility of the very thing being pushed.

In addition, the quality of compulsory products tends to be poor because there is no incentive to improve it when people are forced to receive the product anyway.

We are living in the zombie apocalypse - ELLIOTT FREED

We are in the middle of the zombie apocalypse.

Living beings think about what they are doing.  They study, learn, contemplate.  They make choices based on ethical sensibilities, for those they love, their communities, the world as a whole.

Zombies just kind of wander forward seeking to satisfy their hunger.  They are not thinking about what they are doing.  They are not considering the impact of their actions on others.  They have a hunger and they wander aimlessly, or in pursuit of a scent or sound in the hope that it will lead to the thing that will satisfy their endless craving.

When a doctor cannot tell you what is in a shot, and you can't ask, and nobody knows why they do it or how it works, except that they know it guides them in the direction of their nourishment pellets, that is how zombies live.  Or whatever it is they do.

Bodily sovereignty, externalities and vaccines

The existence of externalities (physical and psychic interconnectedness) means that the approach of "live and let live" is not a complete political philosophy to hold.

A farmer or factory upstream can poison the water that is needed by those living downstream. This is unacceptable and why we have environmental agencies.

But when it comes to our bodies we should never force a product or practice on someone who doesn't want it.

It may be argued that doing so results in a positive externality for society, as in the case of "herd immunity" used to promote vaccines, but I don't think this argument is strong enough to override the individual's right to sovereignty over their own body.

If we do accept that the state owns our body then we are on a slippery slope, indeed!

Propaganda, war and vaccines

1. When enough people come to the conclusion that war is a con they bring in conscription, so people are forced to go. Now that many people are questioning vaccines they are bringing in mandates.

2. The ruling powers really have no respect for the free will of the individual.

Their only concern is increasing their own wealth and power at any cost, and to achieve it, they convince the population that it's in their best interests to submit to their plans.

3. This is achieved by the use of (i) propaganda, (ii) rewarding compliance and punishing non-compliance, and (iii) by mobilising the population against dissent - i.e. by encouraging "the mob" to attack and vilify any who resist.

It's the same process used to convince people to support and fight wars, as it is to convince them to support vaccine mandates, or anything else that is an important part of the agenda of the power elite.

Mind control and mobilise "the mob" against those who resist, or against any group that are seen as an obstacle to the ruling powers achieving their goals.

A doctor responds to non-vaccinating parents

From Dr. Ray Andrew, MD~

“I am running into increasing numbers of patients who decline to receive vaccinations. I don’t call them “anti-vaxxers” because that is the most immature way I can imagine to refer to another human being with an opinion, whether I consider it informed or not. Name-calling is what people do in politics when they don’t have an intelligent response to an opposing party’s argument. This is supposed to be science, not politics.

Based on my experience, those who choose not to vaccinate care just as much about their children as you and I do. But they are looking for information. They no longer consider the AAP and the CDC as unbiased sources of information because the former has ties to the drug industry and the latter actually owns vaccine patents. These parents want me to show them long-term safety studies, which I am unable to find.

They are bothered by the ingredient lists of vaccines, knowing that there are EPA-listed toxins in many of them. Some don’t like knowing that cells and DNA from aborted fetuses as well as animals are used in vaccine production. Some demand true double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled (using saline controls, not adjuvants) trials proving efficacy, which simply do not exist, even though we keep telling everyone that this is the gold standard in medicine. Some ask why—if informed consent exists for every other procedure in medicine—doctors and governments are trying to force vaccination on them, throwing informed consent (a legal right, I was taught) out the window. Some make the argument that, if vaccines are so effective, the vaccinated shouldn’t worry about getting sick from the unvaccinated. And they ask me for scientific proof of the theory of herd immunity. I don’t remember being shown any evidence of this in medical school. It was simply taught as a self-evident fact. But my patients don’t accept that anymore, not without seeing some proof.

So, when I receive all of these communications from different state health organizations telling me how I am supposed to combat the growing threat of vaccine deniers, I feel like a straw man because these communications never present actual evidence to respond to the questions of these parents. They’re just talking points, empty claims, and official pronouncements.

In conclusion, some of my patients vaccinate, and some don’t. I respect both kinds. They are both intelligent and care for their children. Last I checked, the Hippocratic oath doesn’t require me to insult people with whom I don’t agree. I present what evidence I can find, and let them choose based on their values, not mine. Maybe that’s not allowed anymore. Maybe I’m supposed to kick them out of my practice if they disagree with me. Maybe they should be kicked out of school. Out of the country, even. If that’s the America of the future, that’s not a country I would want to live in.”

22 March 2019

Report of a bizarre interaction between parent and doctor on a "well baby visit"

Repost from Elizabeth Gonzales Aeschbacher

I just had a rather interesting experience at baby girl's 12 month wellness visit. The nurse indicated that she was going to be getting several vaccines today and I asked her to bring me the inserts so I could review them. The nurse brought back Vaccine Information Statements instead. Though these ended up being far better than flyers I had seen in the past, I asked again for the inserts. She did not know what I was asking for so I explained I wanted the manufacturer disclosure with the listing of ingredients and risks.

Nurse - "You mean the long paper that comes in the box?"
Me - "Yes."
Nurse "That's not patient information - it's clinical information."
Me - "What does that mean, clinical information?"
Nurse - "It is used for back office things."
Me - "So if we get the vaccines today, you wouldn't give them to me?"
Nurse - "Uhhh..."
Me - "I thought it was equivalent of ingredient/risk info given with any drug/medication."
Nurse - "Not really, but I can let you see them. You'd have to give them back. Which ones do you want?"
Me - "All the ones she is scheduled to receive."
Nurse - "There are seven of them. They are really, really long. You want all seven?"
Me - "Yes."

Nearing the end of our visit, the doctor summarizes how healthy baby is and that the only issue is her vaccines. She understands I have asked to see the inserts but I must give them back. She proceeds to tell me how all the ingredients that are in vaccines are necessary and that nothing is going to happen. I say, "That's a little dismissive. There are risks with all medications." I calmly explain that I'm discontent with health care professionals not being willing to discuss both the risks and the benefits. The doctor begins to get flustered but agrees there are risks with all medications. So i ask, "What are the risks with these?"
She replies with a bit of snark, "Well, what have you found out?"
I respond, genuinely, "No, I'm asking YOU." I haven't researched it as I was intending to talk about it with the doctor and read the insert.
Doctor says, "There aren't any risks."
I say, "You just said there are risks with all medications."
Doctor, getting agitated - "Well there is pain and fever. That is all."
Me - "So if I read the inserts I won't find any other risks in there?"
Doctor- "Well, there are other small things that they have to put in there, for whatever reason."
Me - "The reason would be because they are a valid risk."
Doctor, now clearly losing her composure - "Yeah, but only a very, very small risk. The benefits outweigh the risks. It's my job to keep your baby safe. So you can read the inserts, I'm going to continue to recommend vaccination and we're going to just have to agree to disagree."
Me - "Okay.'
Doctor - "We are just not going to agree."
Me - "I'm not asking you to agree with me."
Doctor is now holding back tears - "I'm not going to be able to provide care for your baby. I feel very strongly about this."
Me - "I can see that."
Doctor walks to the door without another word.
Me - "Is the visit over?"
Doctor - "Yes." Leaves the room.

What on earth...

We are first time parents, coming to these doctor visits with our questions and concerns, seeking information to help us make decisions for our child. We have no position, do no preaching, do no arguing. Yet have been met with attitude, disregard and now emotional meltdown.

Since when is it not okay for a parent to expect to have an open dialogue with their child's doctor? Why are these doctors not prepared to field questions with information and, perhaps, understanding?

There are so many things wrong with this interaction I don't even know where to begin.

* The nurse doesn't know what an insert is.
* The nurse believes the insert is not for patients. But rather some back office thing - for which they must need thousands of the same copies??
* The doctor tells me there is NO risk. Then tells me there is risk. Then tells me there is no risk. Then tells me just pain and fever. Then admits there are other things - that are listed "FOR WHATEVER REASON." A doctor said this.
* Neither the nurse nor the doctor have ever read the vaccine statements they did provide me with because those sheets actually listed the risks!! And said, for more information - ask your doctor and they can provide the inserts!! You can't make this stuff up.
* I never even stated a position or made a decision!
* The doctor was unable to handle a dialogue without getting emotional.
* The doctor had been willing to continue providing care with the understanding that we would agree to disagree - but then changed her mind when her emotions completely took over. Total lack of professionalism.

What kind of crazy world are we living in? This all because I wanted to read the inserts. Which are provided by the manufacturer for this very purpose! I had to snap photos of the brand and vaccine names so I could later find the manufacturer info online.

We took baby girl in one time when she was sick and the doctors weren't concerned but offered anti-nausea meds. I asked if we needed to administer them right then or could I take them home, read the pharmacy insert and decide if we wanted to wait it out or give the meds. Sure, no problem. Any other drug, it is perfectly acceptable to inquire about and inform oneself about risks. Why would this be any different?

I'm an individual that usually finds myself somewhere in the "middle" on any issue. I don't subscribe to labels - in all areas of life, any camp I might have some agreement with, I most certainly disagree with on other things. I suspect there are many people like that. I take issues case-by-case. I seek out many perspectives and sources of information. I don't participate in labeling, discrediting, smearing or sharing ridiculous memes and arguments that lack logic, twist reality, recreate truth - but sure sound salacious. I'm just a normal, old-fashioned person who believes we should be able to conduct ourselves respectfully and reasonably. Is this a dying breed...?

Overcoming whitewashes in government and media

When there's a whitewash in the media about an important subject it's up to private citizens to present the other side of the story on social media. They will be attacked for it, but it's the only moral thing to do. Without it people will be forced to make important decisions based on biased and incomplete information.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on vaccine safety:

"No television network will allow you talk about this. No newspaper in the country will allow me to write editorials on this. I can write editorials in almost any newspaper, but if I try to write an editorial on this issue, none of them will accept it. The [pharmaceutical] industry is so powerful. It spends twice on lobbying what the oil industry spends. It spends four times on lobbying than defense and aeronautics spend. So, it is by far the biggest political expenditures of any industry in this country. And it has been able to get rid of all the checks and balances that stand between a rapacious industry on the one hand, and our children on the other."

Robert F. Kennedy sues vaccine makers for fraud

“I'm currently litigating against the four companies that make all 72 vaccines currently mandated for American children via CDC recommendations. All four of these companies are convicted felons who have paid $35 billion since 2009 for lying to and defrauding regulators and doctors in order to promote their pharmaceutical products. Our trial team coalition includes the country's largest plaintiffs firms- all of them veterans of the Monsanto litigation. These firms have won the largest pharmaceutical cases in history. It's not surprising that we have uncovered proof that the four Vaccine makers' fraudulent and reckless conduct with their other pharmaceutical products pales in comparison to their crimes in testing, manufacturing, and marketing vaccines, since, in this arena alone, they are immune from liability. We can now show with scientific certainty that certain vaccines- DTap, DTP, Hep B- are killing and injuring far more children than were ever harmed by the diseases they are marketed to prevent. This information will soon be public. It would be good for you to see it before you mandate these shots for children. I'm happy to share it in person with you and your staff and whatever experts you choose to include."

Sincerely Robert F Kennedy Jr.

Should people get the measles vaccine? - MATTHEW WARD

Q: “Could you ask Mathew regarding the measles outbreak in Vancouver, WA. Should people get vaccine?” 

MATTHEW: Let us pose this question: The measles virus cannot live in air year after year, so how could a disease that had been almost completely eradicated in the United States several years ago suddenly appear? There are two possible answers. The virus strength in a batch of measles vaccine can be increased enough to cause this highly contagious disease a considerable time after children with weak immune systems are inoculated, thus there is no direct connection with the vaccination. Or, if the virus is added to other toxins in chemtrail spray in a localized area, children in that area who have compromised immune systems can be infected and pass on the disease.

A bit of history will be helpful here, and it goes back to the puppets of the dark forces. When they manipulated the DNA of young civilizations to weaken them physically, spiritually and consciously, they also created disease-causing microbes; and when some of the weakened peoples inhabited Earth, the puppets introduced those microbes on the planet. Some microscopic life forms are essential to bodies’ well-being, but the ones you call pathogens were designed to cause a variety of diseases. Millennia later, medical scientists were inspired to develop vaccines that would prevent communicable diseases from spreading throughout the population.

Whatever is originated for benevolent purpose can be subverted into malevolent use, and that is what the dark ones did with vaccines—they have used them to create disease instead of prevent it. That is why we have long advised against inoculations. Healthcare personnel who are promoting mandatory vaccinations for school attendance as a “public health measure” don’t know the truth or they are collaborating with companies that make the many types of vaccines. Some have ingredients that cause autism-like symptoms in children; and while some physicians who do know this truth state that there is no evidence to substantiate it, parents who refuse to have their children receive recommended vaccinations are acting in their best interests.

There are three important and positive factors here. First, eventually the truth about vaccinations will become publicly known and this practice will cease. After dark minds developed and infected individuals with the AIDS virus about four decades ago—part of their plan to vastly reduce the world’s population—ET scientists among you were given divine authority to reduce the potency of all laboratory-designed viruses. That is why only a few individuals with severely weakened immune systems contracted each new disease that the dark ones also intended to become—and mainstream media widely reported as “feared to become”—a pandemic, and everyone was urged to get vaccinated. Is it not suspicious that with the first case or two of each new communicable disease—SARS, avian flu, swine flu, N1H1—enough vaccine to inoculate many millions already was available?

The second factor is, as the public becomes aware of chemtrails’ damage to their health and the environment’s, their demands to stop the spraying will end this scourge. And third, light changes carbon-based cells, which are vulnerable to disease, into the crystalline cells that are resistant; people who absorb light in sufficiency will strengthen their immune systems and, depending upon the stage of an illness, bodies’ self-healing mechanisms can halt or reverse degenerative effects.

Source: Message from Matthew, March 15, 2019

Aluminum in Vaccines - CHRIS KIRCKOF

Aluminum is a powerful neurotoxin that has a strong affinity for neurological tissue.  https://youtu.be/yCzdliixnmI

Most vaccines contain aluminum. Vaccines in combination can result in toxic aluminum overload. Even the aluminum in a single vaccine can be harmful because the aluminum is in a form that is more dangerous than ingested aluminum. Specifically, vaccine aluminum is in nanoparticulate form, which is harder for the body to eliminate, and because it is transported around the body differently than ingested aluminum.

It is natural and normal to ingest small doses of aluminum from food and water. It’s not good for you, but the body has adequate defenses. Absorption of ingested Al is low, about 0.3%, so about 99.7% is eliminated. Ingested aluminum is in ionic form (individual charged atoms), which is readily removed by the kidneys. Also, ionic aluminum is blocked from entering the brain by the blood brain barrier. The low absorption, rapid elimination by the kidneys and barrier to brain entry adequately protects the brain from aluminum.

However, nanoparticulate aluminum from vaccines cannot be removed by the kidneys. The particles are far too large to be filtered out by the kidneys. The Al nanoparticles do dissolve slowly (converting to ionic aluminum). But long before they can dissolve completely, the Al nanoparticles are ‘eaten’ by immune system cells called macrophages. In other words, the particles wind up inside the macrophages. Once loaded with the Al nanoparticles, the macrophages spread aluminum as they travel through the body. This is dangerous, because the Al-loaded macrophages carry Al nanoparticles to tissues (e.g. the brain) that are damaged by very small amounts of aluminum.

What do they find in the brains of those with autism? Tons of aluminum.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763?fbclid=IwAR3kBS0z2vg6GpvjgJt9IAvXYFi1Qjlyh6qlH6I3Q9VlZMmputWI5KZRKgE

What do they find in the brains of those with Alzheimer's? Tons of aluminum.

https://alzheimersnewstoday.com/2017/01/18/extremely-high-aluminum-levels-found-in-familial-alzheimers-patients-brains/?fbclid=IwAR3cEVLAhSYke8YkVtFwVAzi4MiUfP3ChV9okS8e16HXRtnZ_4ezKCtrVgA

Start thinking and connecting the dots. There is a well designed agenda being carried out right in front of your eyes.

Vaccine facts not everyone is aware of - JERI KEITH

A few quick facts many may not be aware of..

Fact #1: The safety of the current childhood vaccine schedule has never been proven in large, long-term clinical trials

Fact #2: Vaccines have not been tested for carcinogenicity, toxicity, genotoxicity, mutagenicity, or for long-term adverse reactions.

Fact #3: The current vaccine schedule has never been tested for safety in the real world way in which the schedule is implemented.

Fact #4: No independent trials confirm the safety of giving multiple vaccinations at once. Research shows a dose-dependent association between the number of vaccines administered simultaneously and hospitalization or death.

Fact #5: No long-term clinical evidence exists that show vaccinated children have better overall health than unvaccinated children.

Fact #6: There is no independent biological science that shows injecting mercury into humans is safe in any amount. The use of mercury in vaccines increases the risk of neuro-developmental disorders.

Fact #7: No clinical studies have been conducted to establish the safety of using aluminum in vaccines. The neurotoxicity of aluminum is well documented, affecting memory, cognition, psychomotor control, and damage to the blood brain barrier.

Fact #8: The amount of aluminum used in vaccines regularly exceeds the maximum amount permitted by the FDA.

Fact #9: Most vaccine safety trials use control groups consisting of other vaccinated populations, or placebos containing aluminum and other vaccine ingredients. The failure of the medical industry to use a neutral placebo undermines the integrity of vaccine safety claims.

Fact #10: The US Vaccine Court has awarded more than $ 3.3 billion dollars in compensation for vaccine injuries and death since 1988. This includes families whose children developed autism following vaccination.

Fact #11: Artificially induced immunity via vaccines is not life long. Disease outbreaks regularly occur in fully vaccinated populations.

Fact #12: There is no evidence herd immunity can be achieved with artificial immunization. The theory of herd immunity is based upon natural immunity acquired from having the disease.

Fact #13: The government does not conduct vaccine safety trials. The vaccine manufacturer, who is not legally liable for the safety of their product, conducts them.

Fact #14: Vaccine producers Merck and GlaxoSmithKline have paid billions in criminal penalties and settlements for research fraud, faking drug safety studies, failing to report safety problems, bribery, kickbacks, and false advertising.

Fact #15: Mercury is still present in multi-dose influenza vaccines and is used in the manufacture of other vaccines. The influenza vaccine is now being recommended for pregnant mothers though no evidence exists to prove this is safe for the fetus.

Fact #16: Doctors receive no formal training on how to diagnose or treat vaccine injury. Vaccine injury is ignored in medical training.

Fact #17: Vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued no matter what the end result or severe adverse reaction, unlike for a reaction to any other kind of drug.

The two main problems with the vaccine debate

1. The two sides are too hostile to one another, and disregard everything the other side says, while attacking the character of those who hold opposing views.

Because of this, both sides learn little from one another, and can get stuck in narrow and often sloppy thinking.

2. The debate is not allowed to be held publicly.

Because authorities are scared of vaccine skepticism they are unable to rationally deal with it in an intelligent, open way.

And so they pretend there are no doubts over vaccines, except among rabid, irrational "anti-vaxxers", whose views are said to be unscientific and without any basis in fact.

As a result of this attitude and the hostility directed towards vaccine skeptics, the skeptics themselves project the same kind of accusations and loathing back at their accusers.

Open and frank discussion would help heal this rift and would also provide the public with both sides of the story which would help restore faith in the public institutions which are currently seen as being unresponsive to public concern over the issue.

A full and frank debate would shed light on the matter, revealing where more research is needed, rather than the current situation where one side says all is well, with no need to change, while the other side says the whole thing is a total disaster that is destroying the well-being of children and adults, alike!

NICK CATONE - Facts a parent considering vaccinating their child needs to understand

NOTE: NICK CATONE IS A PARENT WHOSE CHILD DIED AFTER RECEIVING STANDARD RECOMMENDED VACCINES

1. I understand that the pharmaceutical company who made this vaccine has NO liability if it injures or kills my child.

2. If my child is killed or hurt by a vaccine, the public will pay through a fund created from a 75 cent tax that's added onto every vaccine given out for any damage the vaccine does. We the people pay...not the pharmaceutical companies.

2.1 I understand that there is a cap on injury/death compensation.

2.2 I understand that even if VICP admits that your child was injured or killed because of a vaccine, that is not a guarantee that they will compensate you for the injury/loss.

They have set criteria that your injury/loss must fit into in order to qualify.

3. I understand that this vaccine contains neurotoxins such as aluminum that far exceeds "safe levels" deemed by the EPA.

4. I understand that this vaccine contains carcinogenic ingredients.

What is the vaccine push really about?

Some people think the vaccine push is about health, some think it's about money, and others think it's about control.

I think it's mostly about control and the depopulation/health deterioration program of the power elite.

Some would ask: why do the power elite wish to damage people's health?

The answer is: to make them easier to control (less intelligent and less willful) and to make them more likely to die prematurely.

The depopulation agenda is widely accepted among truth seekers, and the power elite haven't tried too hard to disguise it.

Analysis of the flu vaccine - CHRIS KIRCKOF

It's flu season!

According to all official health reports, we are now fully in flu season. I remember being taught the seasons, why did my teachers keep the secret 5th season known as the flu a secret from me? It is that time of year when public health officials, physicians pediatricians and pharmacists warn that everyone over 6 months of age should protect themselves and get vaccinated. Most Americans, believing the government’s propaganda about the safety and benefits of the flu vaccine, are joining the inoculation lines without pausing to consider the accuracy and legitimacy of health officials’ and pediatrician claims.

A CBS Investigative Report, published in October 2012, exemplifies the unreliable and perhaps intentionally deceptive misinformation campaign steered by the US government health agencies every flu season. After the CDC refused to honor CBS’s Freedom of Information request to receive flu infection data by individual state, the network undertook an independent investigation across all fifty states to get their infectious disease statistics. The final report contradicts dramatically the CDC’s public relations blitz. For example, in California, among the approximate 13,000 flu-like cases, 86 percent tested negative for any flu strain. In Florida, out of 8,853 cases, 83 percent were negative.

Have vaccines become unnecessary?

Falling infectious disease rates in developed countries have led to a point where the risks of receiving any given vaccine may be greater than the risks of catching that disease.

Click on image to make clear

There was always going to be a point reached where the rates of diseases commonly vaccinated against became so low that it became illogical and unethical to continue vaccinating people for them.

In other words, the risk of catching the disease not longer justifies vaccinating people against them, given the risks associated with vaccinations.

Click on image to make clear

Vaccine proponents will argue: vaccination is needed to continue so that disease rates can continue to remain low, rather than spiraling out of control, but I have yet to see any convincing evidence to justify this speculation.

Instead, the falling death rates of almost all infectious diseases in developed countries, whether commonly vaccinated against or not, seem to indicate that vaccines are not needed to wipe diseases out- rather, improved diets, hygiene and standards of living can be relied upon to do that.

 Scarlett Fever death rate- no vaccine used

Rather than wiping disease out, continuing the widespread vaccination of the community may actually keep that disease alive and well, when live viruses are used in the vaccine that can shed and cause the disease in others, whether vaccinated or not.

For a disease that is close to being wiped out it may be counter-productive to inject live viruses that cause that disease broadly into the population, through live-virus vaccines. Even if only a very small number of the recipients of these vaccines provide a fertile breading ground for these viruses and then spread them to others, it will still keep the disease alive in the community, rather than having it fade away, like many infectious diseases have naturally done.

Seth on immunity, vaccination and death

(click on text above to expand)

p.21-22

Medicine and skepticism

When the people who promote and sell something also collect the data on its effectiveness, I tend not to trust the results and assume the products effectiveness is being overstated.

True independence in studies of medical procedures and substances is rare, which is why many questionable interventions are much hyped and promoted by those who practice and profit from them, yet when a more independent, balanced study is done it turns out the procedure is of limited worth.

Well-constructed, independently performed, double-blind studies of medical procedures are rare, which is why much of what is currently practiced as medicine is hardly scientific, as is claimed.

I believe it pays to be skeptical of anything we are being sold, whether by a doctor, a car mechanic or anyone else who is invested in the product, and to closely research it ourselves, when we are able.

Sharka Todd