The truth about the 911 attacks - Matthew Ward

by Matthew Ward with Suzy Ward

PART 1
written on 22 September, 2001.

MATTHEW: The events as they have been unfolded for the public view are not the ideas of those men the media are proclaiming as “terrorists”—well, government officials are proclaiming that and the media are echoing it.

There are hidden causes and goals, hidden strategies yet to be revealed, and the perpetrators are not those who were so quickly accused.

We understand why many souls there believed without questioning whether reports were complete and accurate or even sounded believable. We understand that acceptance instead of analysis was due to the enormity of the planes deliberately hitting their intended targets and the thousands of innocent lives being in transition almost simultaneously from Earth lifetimes.

The emotions of accepting those kinds of actualities are too overwhelming to permit the mental or emotional margin for wide questioning of the obvious weaknesses in the official findings.

SUZY: I have read quite a few reports that blast the official conclusions, so some people definitely are not accepting all of this as it’s being publicly presented.

Can you tell me without any wavering at all that the towers would NOT have collapsed if there hadn’t been explosives set off?

MATTHEW: Without an iota of wavering, Mother!

S: WHY???

MATTHEW: The destruction had to be in such unthinkable measure that its horror could be filmed—and there’s a questionable area, why television cameras were present even in early moments—and aired relentlessly in these days ever since.

There had to be such shocking loss of life that it overshadowed speculating about the improbability of the towers collapsing due to the stated reasons, or thinking too closely about how the half-full planes were taken over and flown unmolested into their targets in supposedly safeguarded air space.

Has any irrefutable evidence been presented to prove the official conclusions? No, because there isn’t any. Quite the contrary!

Who was Bin Laden, REALLY?

Was Bin Laden REALLY the "poster terrorist" to pave the way for the oil companies into the Middle East?

Was 911 REALLY the work of wealthy elites to further their profits and control?

Bin Laden remains a shadowy figure, steeped in mystery. He is blamed for many atrocities, but where is the proof? No court of law has convicted him of any crime to date and many of his supposed "admissions" have proven forgeries. All we know is that he was actively involved in military training in the era of the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Since then he seems to have remained "on ice"- perhaps preparing for his role as the "Chief Terrorist" in the Bush administrations global "War on Terror" which began in 2001 and continues to this day.

RELATED:
Matthew Ward (spirit) on what REALLY happened on 911 and WHY.

Sharka Todd

Fire, steel and controlled demolition- alternate 911 theories

‎
Snippet of conversation on 911 relating to steel and fire

@J* R*: your doubts [about the alternate 911 theory] are answered in the video series [featuring David Ray Griffin] beginning here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbY5_qtz83M

The 911 “alternate” conspiracy theory does not rest on what hit the Pentagon. The question of how the nominated Arab pilot could (not) have pulled off such a move is discussed in the video.

Even if the steel lost strength [in WTC 1 and 2] near the crash zone and subsequent fires the remaining steel below would not have*. Therefore, a collapse at near free fall speed would be impossible. This is only possible if all support failed near simultaneously which would not be the case in a fire, but would be in a controlled demolition.

(*This ignores the fact that steel is an excellent conductor of heat and that the heat applied to steel near the crash zone would have been conducted away from the site throughout the steel core of the building keeping the steel temperature too low to cause significant structural damage.)

Sharka Todd

Taboo- discussiing 911 with an alternate narrative

What is interesting to me is the psychology of taboo in mainstream media and in almost all mediums of communication, bar the internet.

Discussion of what happened on 911, except for repeating the officially sanctioned story, is almost outlawed! And this is supposed to be a free society? Communist China could not have done a better job in controlling the narrative and they must be studying how to use the idea of censorship by taboo rather than by law and force of arms from their "friends" in the West.

It seems to start by using the world "conspiracy" and then discrediting it and ridiculing anything associated with this term. This tactic is used to marginalise viewpoints perilously close to the truth about issues that are disturbing to the government and the ruling elite.

We must use our discrimination to see through the fog of lies perpetuated by those who gain from keeping the population in a state of ignorance.  This begins by disregarding the bleating of the "conspiracy theory" label voiced by the gatekeepers of the official lie!

Sharka Todd