Photo by Eugene Hoshiko AP
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Response to a comment re Israel and 9/11
Original article is here.
The official conspiracy theory about 911 is equally as offensive, laying the blame with Islamic Arabs. Few critical thinkers trust or believe the Bush administration's narrative of that day, parroted by the corporate media. The controlled collapse of WTC7 and the witnessed bombs in the buildings on that day suggest the official story is just that, a story, used to encourage Americans to support wars of conquest.
The official conspiracy theory about 911 is equally as offensive, laying the blame with Islamic Arabs. Few critical thinkers trust or believe the Bush administration's narrative of that day, parroted by the corporate media. The controlled collapse of WTC7 and the witnessed bombs in the buildings on that day suggest the official story is just that, a story, used to encourage Americans to support wars of conquest.
Friday, March 15, 2013
Enlightenment is the problem (ARTICLE)
by Jeff Foster
The enlightened 'state' is not the solution. It is the unnecessary problem.
When we seek an enlightened 'state' outside of our present experience, our search immediately becomes a rejection and denial of Now, of life exactly as it is, and this 'NO' is the origin of all violence and suffering. In the name of a future freedom and enlightenment, we go to war with ourselves and violate a sacred moment.
The mind could never understand enlightenment, and that's why it invents the mirage of the enlightened 'state', to always keep the goal at a distance, to maintain the illusion of time, to prevent the collapse into Mystery it fears so deeply, in its innocence.
Secretly, we don't seek the enlightened state, experience or person, we seek the source of it all, That which is already enlightened, That which is always and already the light, That which never needs to reach or become the light in time or space.
And so the search for the light collapses in on itself, and all that is left is light, with nobody there to claim or own it, or even to call it 'light'. This is why anyone who claims to be enlightened cannot be enlightened at all. It's the very 'claiming' mechanism, the 'person' itself, that is exposed here in the ever-present universal Light of life. All claims of enlightenment and its absence become meaningless here, and melt into a radical and loving embrace of present experience, the embrace we always sought 'out there', in people, substances and seemingly separate objects. Love is the end of seeking love in time and space.
Love, as the effortless unconditional embrace of every thought, sensation and feeling as it arises and falls in perfect awareness, is the answer to everything, however clichéd that sounds to the cynical mind.
Jeff Foster
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Monday, March 11, 2013
What is sin? (ARTICLE)
(1)
Dolores: What about sin? Is there any such thing?
Spirit: Sin is basically doing what you know is wrong. Doing it knowingly. You can’t sin if you don’t know that it is wrong. You have to have morals to be able to sin. This is where man differs from the animal, the fact that man has conscience. When he kills someone and he knows that it is wrong, that is sin. When an animal does it, he does it unknowingly; therefore, the animal is without sin. He does it mostly for survival or for food- never senselessly.
Dolores Cannon: Between Death and Life, Conversations with a Spirit
(2)
"Tears coursed down my cheeks. Under the spiritual scrutiny of that great, compassionate consciousness I felt like a crawling worm — unclean, filled with error and sin. Yes, I say sin, but not in the ordinary sense men use that word. Rather sin as sin really is. And basically sin is hypocrisy, falsity, the living lie! It is looking at your fellow man with a friendly smile upon your face with treacherous, malicious, or mocking thoughts in your heart. Sin is any and all deviations from absolute truth, perfect love, absolute honesty and righteous motives. Thus actual sin has little to do with Earthly standards of sin."
Orfeo Angelucci, The Secret of the Saucers
Dolores: What about sin? Is there any such thing?
Spirit: Sin is basically doing what you know is wrong. Doing it knowingly. You can’t sin if you don’t know that it is wrong. You have to have morals to be able to sin. This is where man differs from the animal, the fact that man has conscience. When he kills someone and he knows that it is wrong, that is sin. When an animal does it, he does it unknowingly; therefore, the animal is without sin. He does it mostly for survival or for food- never senselessly.
Dolores Cannon: Between Death and Life, Conversations with a Spirit
(2)
"Tears coursed down my cheeks. Under the spiritual scrutiny of that great, compassionate consciousness I felt like a crawling worm — unclean, filled with error and sin. Yes, I say sin, but not in the ordinary sense men use that word. Rather sin as sin really is. And basically sin is hypocrisy, falsity, the living lie! It is looking at your fellow man with a friendly smile upon your face with treacherous, malicious, or mocking thoughts in your heart. Sin is any and all deviations from absolute truth, perfect love, absolute honesty and righteous motives. Thus actual sin has little to do with Earthly standards of sin."
Orfeo Angelucci, The Secret of the Saucers
Is death painful?
Dolores: But the actual death itself, the leaving of the body, is that painful?
Spirit: No. The transition is one of ease rather than of duress. Pain comes from the body. The spirit feels no pain except remorse. That is really the only pain that a spirit can feel. A feeling that they could have done something... more. This is painful. But physical pain no longer has meaning because that was left with the body.
Source: Dolores Cannon: Between Death and Life, Conversations with a Spirit.
Hugo Chavez's cancer was intentionally created
by Matthew Ward
We also cite Hugo Chavez, recently deceased president of Venezuela, whom mainstream media in the United States have portrayed as a bad guy who worked against that country’s best interests. What Chavez worked against was the Illuminati’s dark influence in that country, his own and other Latin American nations, and he was quite successful in driving them out of Venezuela.
Chavez was not wrong in thinking that his cancer did not occur naturally. The media under Illuminati control labelled him a “conspiracy theorist” because they have conditioned you to believe that anything with that designation is pure nonsense. Chavez’ determination to rid his country of their tentacles and to improve the lives of those who are down-trodden did not fit with the dark ones’ agenda. They felt that a public assassination could start a firestorm instead of making it easy for them to regain control of Venezuela’s abundant natural resources, and since they had the means to initiate cancer, that’s what they did. His body just didn’t give out nearly as fast as they expected.
Matthew Ward, March 11, 2013
We also cite Hugo Chavez, recently deceased president of Venezuela, whom mainstream media in the United States have portrayed as a bad guy who worked against that country’s best interests. What Chavez worked against was the Illuminati’s dark influence in that country, his own and other Latin American nations, and he was quite successful in driving them out of Venezuela.
Chavez was not wrong in thinking that his cancer did not occur naturally. The media under Illuminati control labelled him a “conspiracy theorist” because they have conditioned you to believe that anything with that designation is pure nonsense. Chavez’ determination to rid his country of their tentacles and to improve the lives of those who are down-trodden did not fit with the dark ones’ agenda. They felt that a public assassination could start a firestorm instead of making it easy for them to regain control of Venezuela’s abundant natural resources, and since they had the means to initiate cancer, that’s what they did. His body just didn’t give out nearly as fast as they expected.
Matthew Ward, March 11, 2013
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Hitler's distorted creativity: a view from the afterlife
by Dolores Cannon
Spirit: To give an example of how damaged these souls are that come to the “hospital” [in the spirit world], in your [physical] plane there was one called Adolf Hitler. He was not sent to the hospital because his soul was not that damaged. He was sent to the learning portion of the plane, the retreat. He needed a quiet time of reflection because he had become- well, another metaphor- his nerves had become jangled.
The problem in that lifetime was that he was an extremely creative person. He would have been a creative genius but he had no outlets for it because the Depression culture he was raised in did not allow for creative outlets. There was an inordinate amount of energy behind this creativeness, as there always is in these geniuses. It had to have another outlet somewhere and it warped his outlook on life and hence his thoughts, and it developed into the final outcome. That which happened reflected mainly on his father‘s karma rather than his.
Some people seen on TV are clones
"Some influential individuals you see in TV film clips are clones of the [original] persons who have died." (MATTHEW WARD)
This is to maintain the power structures that are in place around these people beyond the death of the original identity.
Friday, March 8, 2013
STOP! - by Jeff Foster
Jeff Foster
Stop. Whatever is happening in the circumstances of your life, stop. Just for a moment.
Gently begin to acknowledge what is HERE, in this moment.
Come out of your conclusions about life, your ideas about the past and future, and begin to notice the sensations, feelings, thoughts that are present, right here and right now. Notice what is ALIVE here. Let your present experience - sights and sounds and smells - become totally fascinating, the most curious dance in all the universe. You are seeing, tasting, touching, hearing the world as if for the first time. This is your Garden of Eden.
Notice how thought is always giving names and labels to things. A car, a tree, a foot. It even labels what you are feeling - "sadness", "anger", "fear", "disappointment", "expectation" and so on. And then judges it as good or bad, right or wrong. Is the feeling the word? Is the judgement the feeling? Try the following today as an experiment:
Instead of calling it 'sadness', drop that label for a moment, and sink deeply into the raw sensation in the body. Feel deeply the sensation in the stomach, the chest, the back of the head. Assume that you don't even know that it's sadness yet. Allow that unnamed life energy to dance and move freely in the sacred space that you are.
Instead of calling it 'anger', drop that heavy and loaded word, and directly contact the intense raw sensation in the belly, chest, throat. Feel directly the intensity of it. Feel the sheer aliveness of it. You are alive! You are alive! Allow life to move without blockage. Notice that these waves of energy are already allowed, without you having to allow them. They are allowed because they are LIFE, and all life is sacred.
Instead of calling it 'fear' - or 'boredom' or 'frustration' or 'powerlessness' - drop that second-hand conclusion, and directly contact the raw, first-hand sensation in the body. Is this energy really against you? Allow it to burn, fizzle, prickle, dance, move, as if for the first time. You have never met this energy before. It is fresh in this moment. It is really a threat to life? Is it really blocking anything, except an IDEA of how this moment should be? Is it really the enemy?
What is sadness, when it is not named? What is anger, when we no longer call it 'anger'? What is fear, prior to the word 'fear'?
What happens when we profoundly contact these life energies without the protection of words and history?
What happens when we stand naked in front of life, and stop pretending to know?
What happens in just a moment of unconditional acceptance, no matter what is going on in the story our lives?
Every moment is an invitation to stop, acknowledge, and deeply allow all of life to move.
Jeff Foster, March 2013
The friendship between Barack Obama and Julia Gillard (PICS)
US President Barack Obama with Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)