Government "health" organisations

Today's I got a letter from a government health department, which seems like an oxymoron, given they promote and pay for dangerous and toxic treatments and ban many natural alternatives and give no financial assistance to anyone taking a natural health path. Damn them to hell, where they belong. They are murderers in my eyes, due to corruption or brainwashing, it's hard to know which.

Destroying "terrorist" organisations

If people think they can destroy "terrorist" organisations with aimless violence against a whole community they'd need to wipe out the whole population. Otherwise the violence inflicted will just grow the resistance against them. It's not rocket science. Peace and fair treatment. No stealing of land. Then see if peace may come. 

But for this to happen the extremist, belligerent leadership of the dominant power must be removed and replaced with people who genuinely want fairness and peace. That's the responsibility of the people. Italy got rid of Mussolini. Israel can get rid of Netanyahu and his cronies in a similar way. Then peace may come.

Medical drugs are only good for emergencies

I understand now medical drugs are for emergencies, they don't offer a path to healing. In fact, I would say they largely inhibit it. Perhaps not in all cases, but generally there seems to be safer, natural alternatives for most longer-term problems. 

What people need is education. Listening to Barbara O'Neill's talks is one way. She is an Australian banned from giving talks in Australia by the Australian government. So is David Icke similarly banned in Australia. 

The Australian government is afraid of system busters. They must all be taking money under the table from the corporations that benefit from the status quo. Either that or they're just ignorant and brainwashed, like most people unfortunately.

The propaganda is so thick, as there is much money to be made from a sick population and none from a healthy one, by these corporations that profit off sickness like vultures. Some call them "big pharma", others "the devil", which is pretty close when you really look at their actions and their products, which are basically toxic garbage. And these firms are all convicted felons, still practising their form of witchcraft, and using their piles of cash to bribe politicians around the world to do their bidding.

Only slaughter the power elite

I'm against all violence except against the deep state or power elite. That's the only language they understand. Line em up and light em up. It'll be fun. Like killing agents in the Matrix. The control freak power elite are agents for the devil after all. Stanley Kubrick told the tale.

And I don't include Elon Musk or Donald Trump in the Satanic "elitist" group. But you can put that Microsoft dickweed in there.

They shall be known by their fruits. 

Let it roll, baby, let it roll!

Once the establishment lose control of a mind

Once the establishment lose control of a mind they never get it back. Just like in the Matrix movies. Once a liar is seen as a liar they are never believed again, even if they do for once tell the truth. There's always an agenda at play with the establishment and it's almost never the one they pretend it is.

Questioning vaccines will get you banned in Australia

The quickest way for a speaker to be banned in Australia is to question the value of vaccines. Vaccines are "magic fairy dust" according to the population poisoning elite who relentlessly push them (and numberless other poisons), and to those they manage to brainwash to believe their giant fantasy.

The history of vaccines they teach is pure nonsense and anyone who questions it is a heretic of the worst sort. They are effectively a murderer, for they may be stopping a child receiving "a potentially life saving injection". 

The ingredients in vaccines are never questioned and are rarely understood or mentioned. They are just accepted as "safe and effective". That's the mantra. Question it and your public career is dead, or at least that is what the tick tock, life negating establishment try to achieve.

Matt Perna

 

"Soaked in Bleach" and the lies told about Kurt and Courtney

Anybody who hasn't watched this documentary "Soaked in Bleach" with an open mind doesn't care about Kurt Cobain or truth and certainty doesn't know it, in this case. It's all recorded, verifiable evidence. 

The public record on this case is false, to protect vested interests, as per usual. Most likely through legals threats, fear, payoffs, and paid journalism. But they couldn't stop this being released, perhaps because it's all true, and to try to stop it would only make it even more widely known about and viewed.

You listen to the recent tripe people like Danny Goldberg (Nirvana's manager) speak, denying the recordings of Kurt and Courtney's shared lawyer, Rosemary Carroll, who said on tape to Courtney Love's Private Investigator Tom Grant, that Kurt had asked for a divorce and that Courtney Love had asked her to find the meanest divorce lawyer she could find. 

Instead, Goldberg acts as if they were a happy couple to the end. That would make Kurt's forged "suicide note" make sense. The part about loving Courtney, anyway. In reality, the cliched forged bottom part of the note makes no sense, except as part of a cover-up. And only benefits those who gain from a dead rock star who wanted to quit the band, the industry and his marriage.

Many people most likely have blood on their hands, even when those hands are filled with money from bribes and record sale profits. Others would be quiet because of fear of threats.

Trees as sentient beings

 

Photos by Todd Goninon

Australia is darkly controlled

Australia is one of those weak, vassal states that bans anything* that alters your consciousness or anything natural that could compete with dangerous pharmaceutical toxins sold as medicine. 

We are a true, dark, Illuminati-controlled country that sells itself as being of the light and being rational, when it's pure BS. 

We are a satanic offspring of the British Empire, controlled by the forces that control it. A mixture of Rothschild and Rockefeller control. This evil yolk must be discarded if we are to become a truly just and enlightened country.

*with the exceptions of the slave poisons alcohol and caffeine.

Shape shifting reptiles

Talk of shape-shifting reptiles ruling the earth has become a joke to many. It's a good way to stay hidden when your existence isn't believed in. I don't know a lot about it but I have read far more than most. That doesn't mean I know the full truth. Very few do. Only the innermost circle. It's interesting information, but not central to how to live one's life in a moral and healthy way and a way that defeats the efforts of those who seek to control and destroy us whether they be lizards or not!

Modern medicine

Not many people have come to the realisation that most doctors can only offer to cut, burn or poison. Yes, some cutting and poison can do good, but it's hardly an enlightened system.

This is not an attack on doctors who are working within a system they have been programmed to believe. Nor is it saying "Never go to the doctor", but rather enlighten yourself first.

Trust as a mathematical equation

Trust can be reduced to a mathematical equation. You cannot trust anyone who has anything to gain from you believing them. These are propagandists and can be found everywhere: particularly in the media, the government and the major institutions, public and private.

Those who you MAY be able to trust have nothing to gain from whether you trust them or not. They have nothing invested in the "trust" game. Therefore, they are not trying to manipulate your view. They MAY be trusted, with the accent on MAY. But it doesn't mean they're right.

Now the establishment finally attack Russell Brand

The establishment are so slow going after their critics it makes me think they're on Mogadon*. 

Assange took years to get to, and so did Alex Jones. Trump took years, Rogan took years and now Russell Brand has taken years to finally attack using old information that has no evidence attached to it as far as I'm aware. But they haven't gone after David Icke. Too boring a petsonal history, I support. No easy lies to conjure. 

It doesn't pay to fuck around if you are eventually going to call out the establishment. They'll get you for that. And anyway promiscuity is a stupid, empty, self-degrading practice. Or is it?

Whatever. The establishment can and will still go to hell.

*A popular tranquiliser from the 70's which seems a relevant relic to revive from the past, considering the establishment is controlled by old farts in mansions, at least 50 years behind the times.

Man-made climate change

When we use the term "man-made climate change" we open ourselves to the possibility that the changes we see are being intentionally driven by evil, power mad users of man-made weather technologies. 

This is in opposition to any changes unintentionally or passively caused by normal human activity, which is the definition most people are aware of, whether it be true or not.

Very few seem aware of the former, intentional effects. By design, of course.

Is death the worst thing to happen to us?

In this world supposedly the worst thing that can happen to you is to die. Not to suffer for years on end, but to die. 

In the next world, at least for most people and according to multiple reports the best thing that can happen to you is to die, or be "reborn" into that world. 

If this belief in the glory of the next world became commonplace in this world things would change dramatically and the idea of legal and freely available euthanasia would become a no-brainer.

Problems with the drug approval process

People often talk about "evidence based medicine" but it has many problems. One is the cost of trials to bring a new drug to market. I read somewhere it is in the vicinity of one billion dollars. No-one will spend that amount of money on trialling an unpatentable natural product for FDA approval. 

Another problem is the length of the trials themselves. They tend to be no longer than a few weeks, so we have no idea of the longer-term effects of these substances. 

Another issue is the interaction between the various drugs people are often on. Drugs are not generally tested for this, but rather in isolation. 

Another issue is that new drugs are generally treated on healthy, young volunteers without any major health complaints, whose response to a drug may be quite different to that of a sick, debilitated or old person. 

Finally there is the issue of drug companies, who perform their own tests, cherry picking ones with the best results to present to the FDA for approval.

These are just a small sample of some of the issues with the current drug approval regime.