What is justice?

There is only one real kind of justice. That is receiving back the same energy we give out.

If there is no justice in this cosmos, then the whole thing is a sham and deserves to burn, for it is valueless, in the truest meaning of the word.

Many of us act as if justice were just something people conjured up.

Anyone who believes in justice, while they are in balance, will not give out any energy they would not wish to receive in return.

This is the origin of the golden rule:

DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU.

This rule doesn't just refer to how we treat other humans. It goes way beyond that to how we treat all lifeforms, for all life is the creation of the One Creator.

That doesn't mean we are not to eat food essential for our nourishment or to sparingly use the resources the earth provides for our survival, creativity and comfort.

It does mean treating all forms of life with respect and not being wasteful of the earth's resources.

These are obvious commandments to anyone who respects the Creator and believes this universe is not some random occurrence but, instead, something deeply beautiful and meaningful and the creation of an equally beautiful and meaningful spirit or mind.

Establishment believers and non-believers and Q

Q

It was interesting and depressing to see people in the truth movement join forces with the establishment true believers in their rejection and ridicule of the Q messages.

The "truthers" claim Q to be a CIA psyop to make people complacent, as if a popular uprising was around the corner. 

What, a few militias with guns doing what, exactly?

Trying to take out the government and in their attempts inevitably making things worse for everyone?

The CIA psyop idea makes little sense. They've got bigger things to worry about. Plus, they would never share those kinds of truths.

Aa for the other group, the true establishment believers, who have lived with their heads in the sand for the last 20 years and who still believe the discredited mainstream media/propaganda outlets.

It's a great combination. The ignorant and the arrogant, combined.

Neither with any evidence to prove their theses.

They may say there is no evidence that what Q said was true. They would be wrong about that. 

Millions of people are aware of the facts Q shared, but the true, underground war, if there is a war, is based on secrecy and deception and so it's not as if all tactical manoeuvres are going to be revealed publicly by Q or anyone else.

It's not like either side can come right out and say what they are going to do.

Also, the timing of events can never be predicted, with all the moving parts in play and situations continually changing.

So anyone thinking the time has passed, and therefore Q was wrong, hasn't read the messages. There are no timings. No dates are set for any event. So, to use the notion of anything occuring "too late" is based on a lack of actual information. 

People may ask, "What was the purpose of Q?""

I'm not part of the Q group, so cannot speak for them, but the purpose could have been to gather like minded individuals, who already know much of this information and to enhance their faith that things are moving towards a resolution that shall prove deeply satisfying and that justice shall be served.

Q was never to convince non-believers and those bonded to establishment narratives.

Q was also clearly not to stop some imaginary uprising by the population that was never going to happen, given the military strength of the US government. 

Only the military can remove a treasonous government and other involved criminal individuals around the world.

How this plays out is the interesting part.

It is natural that there are non-believers, but I think the evidence of an underground war that emerged above ground some years ago is quite clear.

Ultimately, everybody chooses what to believe, and only time will tell (and not on anyone's timetable), what exactly is, and has been, going on over these strange past 10 years or so.

Certainly, public awareness has changed since the advent of the internet, and since the cabal went public with their 9/11 terror attacks.

Allies and enemies are creations of the ruling class

The whole concept of "allies" is just a creation of the ruling class.

 

All humans are equal and their lives are equally valuable.

There is no need for enemies.

They are creations of the ruling class, as well.

In many cases they create them and they fund them, and they create the propaganda against them to keep the division, wars and sanctions going for their own benefit.

The unspeakable health subject

Probably about a decade or so ago I started writing about a certain contentious subject on Facebook. Contentious because the establishment is especially protective of it. When you understand the puppet masters of the establishment, this protection makes total sense. 

Some people will dismiss such notions as there being puppet masters in this world as unrealistic and the talk of an unhinged person. An Alex Jones or David Icke, who've turned out to be right about most things and way ahead of their time.

The mistake I made was not disguising certain words, especially the name of this particular item I was discussing.

The reason that this was a mistake was because of how Facebook's algorithm works.

Their algorithm works by picking up certain words and phrases and then reduces the audience reach that user achieves if those statements don't serve their masters.

This is called shadow banning and has being going on for a long time.

This may be mostly or entirely to do with pressure on Facebook (as with Google and other internet sites) by agencies such as the CIA, who are able to demand certain actions of these companies and require by law that these demands not be revealed publicly (listen to Edward Snowden for more about this.)

I wasn't discussing this topic because I was an expert, although I had heard a large number of accounts by people on Facebook and in real life of damage and death, caused by this item that shall remain nameless, on their children, and because I could see how governments were becoming more brazen in pressuring adults to allow these items to be inj****ed into their children, just so they go to school, I was disturbed.

The people behind this insidious program start with those who cannot protest. Then, they move onto adults, who can protest, by creating a "pandemic" by the release of a specially manufactured bioweapon*, and creating enough hysteria in the media to push through mandates, so that many adults could not go about their normal lives without receiving this product or bioweapon. 

This event was very much like the mark of the beast in the Book of Revelation in the Bible. 

I was right. The assault on adults did occur, but children came first, with children in the USA being under the greatest assualt. 

This fiendish "pandemic" plan was promoted by a level of propaganda and brainwashing rarely seen, except perhaps in the promotion of war, the establishment's other favourite past time. 

People will point to studies that support the use of these bioweapons, not realising there are hundreds of scientific studies that show them to be harmful.

Mainstream media, who in America make much of their income from companies that make these bioweapons laud their value, while ignoring or underplaying their dangers. This is not just a financial decision. It's a result of CIA infiltration into media companies under the Operation Mockingbird program, still in effect today. A verified program that the uninitiated would also cast off as a crazy conspiracy theory.

Some people just cannot be taught about how the world is really run. In part, because it's too dark for them to accept.

Simple logic explains why these bioweapons are dangerous and damaging, depending on their batch. To make each dose equally harmful would make their dangerous nature too obvious. So instead, it's a crap shoot, with some recipients escaping largely unharmed, while some are destroyed by them, and with others the damage is somewhere in between.

The simple logic is this: the companies that make these products profit off a sick population. Their profit model is a lot like the subscription model that is taking over the world with many paid services. This profit model has people who are sick or even just stressed from the pressures of modern living, being placed on drugs, often for the rest of their lives. 

So children, who are given a number of doses of these unmentionable products, even just after birth, are being given them by companies that profit from these children being sick for life. This is clearly a terrible incentive structure, if a healthy population is the goal, which it clearly is not.

If this isn't enough to make people question these products, I don't know what is.

These companies who manufacture these products are all convicted felons who hide unfavourable data to do with their products, and the combined profit made in this industry, is in the hundreds of billions of dollars and is growing larger as the population becomes sicker.

*Some people believe there was no bioweapon, just hysteria created out of nothing but the misidentification of regular illnesses by a test not fit for purpose.

Trump, the Russia-Ukraine war and empires

When Donald J. Trump talked about dividing Russia and China I would hope he wasn't being serious. The world needs a multipolar world, not an empire. Empires can do as they please, as we see from endless US wars and proxy wars and Israel's genocide in Gaza. These are the products of empires.

People with no knowledge of history may say Russia declared war on Ukraine unprovoked. That was not the case. The provocations are well known, and I have no interest in repeating them here.

The Russia-Ukraine war has always been a proxy war between the Western Empire, for want of a better term, and Russia, designed to degrade Russia's strength at any cost in terms of Ukrainian lives and infrastructure and put pressure on Putin, whom the West despise because they can't buy him or murder him (yet.)

To this end, Vladimir Zelenskyy was installed as a puppet to do the West's bidding. This is why no peace treaty is possible while the West controls Ukraine and feeds its war effort.

Trump knows this. All educated folk know this. Only buyers of Western propaganda are unaware.

The false choice between being atheist and being religious

The choice between being an atheist and a Christian or belonging to another religion is a false one. 

That doesn't automatically make a spiritual believer a "New Ager", a term often used to belittle someone, the way the word "hippy" is often used these days.

It's interesting how words are used as weapons in our world; a way to divide and denigrate other people. 

They are scorned because they don't hold on to the one great true philosophy. 

People who hold this attitude of superiority and condescension towards others are not building a better world. Their is no humility in this viewpoint.

What if we are wrong? People will point to this expert or this passage in this book, or multiple passages to prove they are right.

It's fine to hold beliefs, a philosophy, a world view. It's inevitable. As long as we don't belittle others for not sharing it.

The only way for peace to occur in this world is for us to accept others as they are, admit we don't know everything and treat people neighbourly. 

As Jesus said "love your neighbour as yourself." MARK 12:31, NIV

The Golden Rule stands: treat others as you wish to be treated. Don't belittle them, don't vilify them, accept that they are different from you, with a different soul, a different purpose and a different life experience.

Jesus and forgiveness

The teachings of Jesus are my favourite of all prophets. Being called the only son of God is interpreted by many Christians to mean something I don't agree with. The son or daughter of God (to me) is the man or woman who embodies the qualities of God while living as a human. If no one else is embodying these qualities, then a person such as Jesus could easily be described by his followers as THE ONLY SON OF GOD. The same could be said about a woman embodying these same Godly qualities. 

People will talk about the miracles Jesus performed, which signify that he was of a different quality than other humans. But Jesus himself is quoted as saying in John 14:12: 

"... I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father."

As for the virgin birth and the resurrection, it has been noted that a number of historical, mythical figures have been described as having the same experiences. Examples include Osiris, from Egyptian mythology, Dionysus, from Greek mythology, The Phrygian god Attis, and Krishna, the well-known Hindu god. 

Many other historical figures have had attribed to them either a virgin birth or a resurrection. 

Personally, I see Jesus a little like how the Islamic faith see him, as a great prophet, but with the exception that I see him as the great teacher of the West in particular, and also anyone around the world, particularly in Africa and South America (it would seem), who resonate with his message of love for one another, truth, peace and forgiveness, all of which are closely related and reinforce one another.

In a sense, he was a great teacher for communities as well as for the individual because hardened hearts and a lack of forgiveness cause much of the strife in the world.

When asked how often should we forgive those  who sin against us, this is what Jesus said:

"... Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?”

Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times."

MATTHEW 18: 21-22 NIV

This is why I see the Christian religion as the religion of forgiveness. 

In the passages above, Jesus was making it clear that we should forgive others, who are all our spiritual brothers and sisters, an unlimited number of times.

This doesn't equate to allowing other people to walk all over us. 

We should speak out when others act in a hurtful and disrespectful way towards us, but if we are to follow the path of Jesus then we are commanded to forgive others their trespasses [sins against us], just as we ask that our sins be forgiven.

After all, we are only human, and humans hurt one another, often without realising it, for a number of reasons. 

In such cases, the person who has been sinned against should make their feelings clear so that the other person becomes aware of it. 

If that person continues to sin against us, after being warned, by engaging in hurtful or condescending behaviour towards us, then it is our right to distance ourselves from that person, if possible. 

If the person asks why you have pulled away, then tell them forthrightly. 

We must be strong as well as loving, for one without the other is either dangerous or weak. 

Jesus was a strong figure and a compassionate one. 

He wasn't a love and light, hurt nobody by saying anything controversial person. Far from it. He told it as he saw it. 

Jesus attacked the privileged elites of his day for their hypocrisy. This may have got him killed. 

However, in his death, Jesus showed his courage and willingness to die for the truth.

The values of my Facebook friends

Why Trump is sucking up to Netanyahu

People don't understand why Trump is sucking up to Netanyahu, in my opinion. 

Trump knows Netanyahu is a monster. 

He's seen the destruction of Gaza and the murder of potentially hundreds of thousands of people (see the Harvard report of missing people in Gaza). 

The point is that this legal case against Bibi is a reason for him to wage continual war. Take away the legal case, and there is one less reason for him to wage these wars. 

You see, some people, of which Bibi is probably one, would prefer to see the world burn than go to prison. Israeli Prime Ministers have been sent to prison in the past, so the threat is real. 

The need is to diffuse one of the reasons Netanyahu has to wage continual war. 

Saying fawning things about Netanyahu by Trump is wise. 

For one, Trump doesn't want to be assassinated by Mossad, who are closely connected with the CIA,  who are widely held responsible, at least in part for John F. Kennedy's assassination. So he can't take on Bibi directly. That would be madness and place his life at great risk 

A Netanyahu who is not threatened by having his life ruined, which is what jail time would do, is a less dangerous Netanyahu. So it's best for that possibility to be taken off the table for now, even though the world would be a better place with him in prison, along with his cabinet members.

Trying to assassinate or overthrow Netanyahu would be madness, as well. 

For at least the reason that the the CIA is so closely connected with Mossad, who are masters at assassination. 

Trump wants to stay alive, understandably, and it's best,  in my opinion, for everyone if he does.

So for now, Bibi stays, and an unthreatened Netanyahu is a safer Netanyahu. 

What happens in the future, time will tell. 

Netanyahu and his backers are a formidable force, and Trump would be well aware of that. 

He also needed to patch up relations after his outburst against Israel recently. 

Netanyahu needs to be on Trump's side. 

No wise leader will take on Netanyahu. He's not just one man working alone. He's the tip of the spear, with powerful and highly dangerous backers. He must be treated very carefully and Israel is the Western Empire's Middle Eastern capital and one of its most important projects.

Trump can only work with those whom he is in (apparent) agreement with. 

Figures like Zelenskyy, who is a puppet of the Western Empire, cannot be worked with, because he's not making the decisions and the people behind him want ongoing war, because they are against Putin and want him out so they can control Russia. 

That would only leave China as an independent power in the world. 

That would be their last target. 

War is deception. 

If people take things at face value, they will be misled. 

The truth is often in direct opposition to what is being public stated and revealed.

How Israel is to be ultimately defeated as a brutal colonial power is an incredibly difficult proposition and how that is to occur remains to be seen.

The saying "keep your friends close and your enemies closer," remains true, when one's enemies are as formidable as Benjamin Netanyahu and the global shadow government that supports him.

Being called a "conspiracy theorist"

Being a so-called "conspiracy theorist" means not believing everything officials and TV, radio, and newspaper journalists say.

So it's a very low bar.

And yet bizarrely, there are still those who are true believers in official stories and the words of media propagandists.

Never questioning anything, even when what they were told was later proven to be false.

It's like they think, yes, they lied then, but they'll never lie again.

But like they say, past behaviour is the best predictor of future behaviour.

In truth, the establishment are war mongers, but not Trump I don't believe, but many of the pundits on TV and elsewhere apparently seem to want the world to go up in flames, perhaps for a good news story. 

After all, "if it bleeds, it leads."

Why can't Trump stop the Gaza genocide?

I wonder what the plan is for [ending the Gaza genocide]. Trump's Iranian action was such that Congress, which is controlled by Israel/the deep state, couldn't complain. 

Even though it ended a war, they probably wanted it to be another 20-year war. 

I don't think Trump can send troops in to Gaza without Congressional and therefore Israel's approval. 

The same is true for stopping military aid. 

I'm not sure what option is open to Trump to stop the humanitarian disaster there. 

Not while Congress is owned by Israel, and Israel's Mossad kills anyone who goes against them. 

That's why Israel is so tricky to deal with. 

Similarly, Ukraine, who are being controlled by European countries and other deep state entities who want the war to continue until there are no Ukrainians left, or they run out of money, just to hurt Russia. 

The US should definitely stop all support for Ukraine. 

But once again, Congress, who are deep state controlled, wouldn't allow it.

Only Hollywood makes soldiers appear heroes

Soldiers are just wind-up toys for governments they know nothing about. If they did, they wouldn't be soldiers. The same goes for sailors and airman. 

Hollywood makes them into heroes, but they're just stupid, mindless killers. 

Unless they are truly protecting their nation, which is incredibly rare these days. 

It's all about wars of aggression driven by greedy elites, who think the common person is a fool, and they're largely right.

Colonisation and stealing from poor countries by the rich

One thing the deep state, negative elite or corporatocracy, whatever term people prefer, hates is for a country to nationalise their natural resources. 

This is when a government comes to power that takes ownership of their oil or gas reserves, timber or precious minerals from a foreign company and places it in the hands of their people on whose land it belongs. 

Colonisation of countries national wealth has been going on for hundreds of years and involves bribing or threatening local officials and a European, American or multinational company takes ownership of a country's valuable natural resources, extractioning them until they are no longer profitable, paying the local workers a pittance to extract the resources, and the wealth ends up in the hands of wealthy families in Europe and America. 

The only locals who significantly benefit financially from this practice are the officials who are bribed. What is left behind is pollution, a devastated environment and an impoverished local population, which is why it has been so difficult for nations in the global south (in South America and Africa and southern Asia) to pull themselves out of poverty.

This process was detailed in the important book "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins.

Leaders who can not be bribed to give up their countries' natural resources have their lives destroyed, are overthrown in foreign backed coups, or are assassinated.

This is no game, and the number of leaders assassinated would be much greater than people realise because the techniques of murder go far beyond just a bullet to the head. Fast acting cancers can be induced, and this has happened to a number of Socialist Latin American leaders. Poisoning is another method. There are more, of course. Natural seeming heart attacks can be induced. These are just techniques that can be used. The CIA and other secret agencies are involved in these assassinations.

This is potentially why Iraq and Iran have been targeted by the West under the pretext of presenting some existential threat. It has been argued that Afghanistan was invaded to put in a gas pipeline.

Things are rarely as they are presented by the media and governments of colonising nations. Government officials are bought and controlled, and the media companies are just mouthpieces for these wealthy families.

Most wars are about the theft of natural wealth. Few leaders, no matter how strong, are able to stop this cycle, and if they do, it's usually not for long.

It has been said that the wealth of Europe is stolen from countries in the global south, especially the insane wealth of the elites. This includes the USA as well.

When people use terms such as the power elite, shadow government, Illuminati, or deep state, they are, in large part, referring to these hugely wealthy families involved in this brutal economic colonisation. 

Of course, these are not the only dark practices that these families are involved in, but that's a topic for another day.

Read David Icke to find out more about those sinister, immoral practices.

Israel, Iran and the USA

In the lead up to the US strikes on Iran, Bibi Netanyahu claimed that Iran had attempted 2 assassination attempts on Donald J. Trump, without presenting any evidence whatsoever. He's clearly a big liar and not to be trusted. I think Mossad would have been more likely to kill Trump if he refused to do Israel's bidding.

Trump had his "great success" with his bunker busting bombs.

If he leaves it there and there are no attacks on American bases that litter the area, illustrating their position as a world military empire, then peace should reign.

It's unlikely Iran would attack these bases given Trump's bellicose rhetoric, although a false flag attack by Israel remains a possibility. 

If Trump is wise he will be aware of this and not be drawn into any unnecessary extra military action that could lead to a greater conflagration.

The war should end now that the so-called objective has been reached.

Israel also need to stop killing Palestinians and limiting their access to food, water and other essential aid.

If not, all support for them from civilizated nations should end and trade sanctions applied.

Israel should be able to stand alone, anyway.

They are a wealthy, developed nation.

They also need to be held accountable for any war crimes and breaking of international law conducted over the last 21 months.

Netanyahu's corruption case should proceed, as planned, and if he is found guilty an appropriate prison sentence should be applied.

Love for our enemies

Servants of darkness are like puppets on a string, with no conscience or empathy. Servants of the light are free will individuals, who have an awakened conscience and empathy for all living things, even those who commit atrocities. 

That doesn't mean that those lost to darkness should not be put down, if necessary, but it means they are treated as a living, feeling being while they are alive.

As the Master of our age said:

[Love for Enemies]

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 

If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect."

MATTHEW 5:43-48. NIV

Singing our songs of existence

The safest thing to do in life is to be silent. To not speak about contentious topics, even if we have a strong viewpoint. 

Sometimes silence may be appropriate, but at other times, it is not. Those other times we are silent when we should speak out are called "sins of omission."

If we are worried about what other people might think about what we say or write then we are being controlled by them, and in a weak position.

People who know our souls, our true soul mates, will not cut us out of their lives just because of a difference of opinion.

So speak freely.

The world can only grow through more openness and communication.

It is secrecy that is the danger, as JFK warned in his famous "secret societies" speech. 

That doesn't mean airing our dirty laundry, but instead speaking of the matters that are important to us and concern us.

We may get things wrong, and it's OK for people to correct us.

How else will we know we are wrong unless we share our thoughts?

How else will we grow in our understanding?

Of course, experience is #1 in importance, but communication is also essential. 

That communication could be with a child, a disabled adult, a dog, a mouse, or a cat. 

Any living thing can teach us.

Sometimes observing is the most powerful thing we can do.

Even in observation, there can be communication. 

The trees communicate, not through words but simply by being.

All things are singing their song of existence.

We have every right to sing ours.

What is the establishment and can it be trusted?

Sometimes, I use the term "establishment," which brings up the question "what or who is the establishment?"

Ultimately, there's no need to know who exactly makes up the establishment. The important question is, can they be trusted and are they benevolent?

Since 9/11 truth emerged, it became clear the establishment was malevolent and untrustworthy. 

That's all you need to know, in addition to what they control.

They control the mainstream media, private and public, including newspapers and TV networks, they control Google and Wikipedia, many online media outlets, most governments and many NGOs, especially the large and international ones like the WHO.

The question becomes: what sources don't they control and what sources of information can be trusted?

That becomes increasingly clear with experience and by determining the accuracy of information over time that a source shares.

One sign that a source is unreliable is when they parrot establishment propaganda. 

Only sources that question establishment propaganda can be trusted to any extent.

Even then, it may require cross referencing with other non-establishment aligned sources to arrive at a more reliable picture of a situation.

Vaccine company incentives

The fact that companies that profit from a sick population also make vaccines, which are supposed to reduce illness, is like a sick joke that few people understand.

Add in liability protection that no other health product receives and you have no incentive to make safe products, which creates a recipe for disaster.

It's no wonder chronic illness rates, particularly among children, are sky-rocketing.

Perhaps not entirely due to the burgeoning vaccine schedule, but I'm sure it's not helping.

Tackling the true causes of the brain damage epidemic

The fact that increasing rates of "autism" (i.e., brain damage) in our children is being caused by poisoning is so obvious, and yet the establishment is totally unwilling to admit it. 

Perhaps this is because the establishment benefits financially from illness and actually encourages a weak and easily controllable population for the benefit of the ruling classes. 

The source of the poisoning of our children is the big question for those of us who care about the health of our population. 

Considering the fact that our society poisons everything it touches, including food, water, air, and medicine, it makes tracking down the main culprits of this "autism"/brain damage tidal wave hard to achieve.

This is the task of medical researchers today. 

Not to try to discover new poisonous drugs to treat illness, but instead to discover what is causing illness and, in particular, what is causing the exploding rates of brain damage in our children (falsely labelled autism, which is a natural and extremely rare condition), and also increasing rates of brain damage in older adults labelled as dementia.

Until the environmental causes of these and other health conditions are discovered, chronic illness rates will continue to sky-rocket, and this will cause financial and social collapse.

This issue is as important as global peace and financial stability, and yet it has been largely ignored.

Hopefully, the appointment of a true health campaigner, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may help get this process started and get to the root causes of the disease epidemic, rather than agencies ignoring the key health issues of our time and doing business as usual.

Bernie Sanders should blame the DNC not Trump

I would much prefer to see Bernie Sanders rail against the Democratic party leadership than against Donald Trump. It would be much more honest of him, for it was they who blocked him twice from becoming president, not Donald Trump. Trump just happened to be a far superior candidate than the poor candidates the Democratic party leadership chose, such as "Crooked" Hillary Clinton, fake "President" Joe Biden, and the empty-headed chick the DNC foolishly ran with last time.

So blaming Trump for anything seems disingenuous when he was chosen by the US population, in part, because he had no real opposition, thanks to idiotic and self-serving choices made by the Democratic Party leadership.

How could so many "experts" be so wrong?

A commonly heard refrain from people when confronted with an alternative to the conventional story they have been told all their lives is, "How could so many experts be wrong?"

The mistake here is using the word "expert."

An "expert" is too often a person who repeats what someone THEY THOUGHT was an expert told them, and on and on it goes.

What many people think of as experts are really generalists at best, and brainwashed apparatchiks at worst.

The world is full of the latter.

The use of "the expert," rolled out by a corrupt establishment, to brainwash the public and lead them in a certain direction, is as old as time, itself.

God v's gods

Some atheists like to argue their case by conflating the big G (God as the Creator of All) with little g's, meaning gods of legend, like Zeus and Apollo, and the myriad gods of pagan religions. These are all minor gods. Nobody claims they are the big G.

It is possible that plenty of "minor" gods actually exist, rather than being the stuff of legend. For what is a god but a being with greater powers than a human? And given the size and make-up of the universe, isn't it likely there are living entities, physical or not, with powers greater than humans? These would be like gods to us, just as we would seem like gods to beings less advanced than ourselves.

"We" are not responsible

Quite a few people use the term "we" when describing the actions of their government. As in "we did this..." or "we did that...". As if they were part of government decision, when they weren't. There's no "we" in it and it's pathetic to think there is. "We" didn't give billions to Ukraine, "we" didn't blow up the Nord Stream Pipeline, "we" didn't carry out the 911 attacks, "we" didn't plan and carry out the John Kennedy assassination, "we" didn't go to the moon and "we" didn't win the Second World War. Sections of the US government did many of these things, or contributed, but it's not only wrong to say the US population, in general, did these things, or that some civilian alive today is somehow, in some way, responsible for any of these things. 

We're responsible for what we do, but not for what anyone else does, including any government. That should be pretty clear by now. And we certainly aren't responsible for any past event, unless we were directly involved. 

So this use of "we" in such instances should be done away with. It's a false claim of responsibility or blame and it sounds stupid.

Unity consciousness: the eye within the storm

In certain spiritual circles, there is talk of unity consciousness versus duality. In Buddist terms, this is "being awake" versus being in Samsara or delusion.

This world promotes duality, us and them, I and They, me and you.

In the spiritual perspective, there is no differentiation between within and without. Objects in consciousness are treated equally. 

That doesn't preclude the ability to recognise danger or to move away from that which is destructive.

Discernment still exists in the state of unity consciousness, but the emotional charge is gone. There is no hatred for any other. There is only compassion, for all beings are seen as part of the one life, the one cosmos, which we all inhabit and share.

In Buddhist terms, this state of equanimity, or unity consciousness, results in "right action, right thought and right deed." 

This view represents the idea that when we are at peace, we can see things clearly, and we can respond appropriately to events that arise. 

When we are instead emotionally inflamed right action and thought become impossible. Even our perceptions and judgements will be adversely affected. We literally will be unable to see straight or to think straight. 

This is perhaps a reason beings get caught in the web of ongoing karmic relations, due to wrong action being performed in past lives or in this one.

The way out is simple. Develop equanimity towards all things. We need to not be reactive in this life. We can see ourselves as like the eye of a storm, where there is peace within while being surrounded by instability and madness.

The world is indeed mad, and madness is on the rise as life becomes increasingly unpredictable and unstable.

We can expect to be surrounded by people who lose their minds, particularly if they are plugged into the matrix of mind control.

The news is perhaps the primary tool of the deluded ones to inflame the population, so they will be as deluded as the propagators are.

After all, the spiritual enemy feeds on negative emotion, and this is what keeps it alive, both within us and in the world at large.

So, to be clear, it is our duty to see through all this and have compassion for those who are lost. That doesn't mean everyone can be saved. Many will fall, unable to stabilise in chaotic times. But we can build a symbolic fortress around us by pulling back and not buying into the dialectic state of mind being promoted. Just say "no," as Nancy Reagan so wisely said.

So sit on your chair of peace and share that peace will all around you.

Love wins, and the time of chaos will soon come to an end.

So let's not get involved in the slagging matches, which are just egoic delusions and focus on that which never changes. The formless, changeless One within.

The rich man and the kingdom of heaven

If "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God" (Matthew 19:24) did this man, below, achieve it?

And what does "the kingdom of God" actually mean?

Many interpret "the kingdom of God" to refer to the afterlife, specifically the part of the afterlife the faithful are believed to enter upon their death, that part we call "heaven", but could "kingdom of God" instead mean a state a being achievable on earth as in heaven?

Could "kingdom of God" be referring to a state of peacefulness or equanimity, attainable in both heaven and earth, which may be difficult for a rich person to achieve and maintain if they are overly focused on building a fortune and then worried about holding onto it?

Angry establishment cult believers

When the establishment can brainwash people into thinking something is scientifically proven, when it isn't, it can become like a religion, and believers become angry with people that don't share their cult-like beliefs.

The irony is that many of these people think they are too smart to be brainwashed and too clever to fall for a religion or a cult.

If that were true, they wouldn't get so upset with people who don't share their dogmatic views.

Our health is our responsibility

Our health is not the government's responsibility. It's not the medical industry's responsibility. It's not RFK Jr.'s responsibility. 

It's our responsibility. 

There is no doubt our environments are full of poisons, poisons are sprayed on much of our food, soils are depleted by poor farming practices, town water is poisoned, etc. 

However, we can't control these things and so it's up to us to educate ourselves about health and healthy living and put into practice what we've learnt.

The Establishment versus The Truth

The establishment includes the political system, the mainstream media, and most, if not all, well-known institutions, national and global. Google and Wikipedia are also under the establishment banner.

It's this multi-tentacled beast that controls most people's thinking and beliefs.

This wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't for the fact that the establishment is deeply untrustworthy due to the dark forces that control it.

Thankfully, many people are awake to this.

These people and their beliefs are attacked relentlessly by the gatekeepers of the establishment to try to keep the population under their control.

The true battle on earth isn't being fought by armies. It's a battle for people's minds and, therefore, their behaviour. 

Hundreds of billions of dollars are spent on this propaganda war by the establishment, while the non-believers tend to just function by sharing the truth as they see it, without spending billions of dollars in doing so.

It's David versus Goliath, in a battle David must win.

Will future humans willingly choose the Matrix?

In the Matrix movies, people are kept in life supporting pods AGAINST THEIR WILL while their minds inhabit a virtual reality they mistake for true reality.

In the not-too-distant future, the possibility of people CHOOSING to place their body in a pod while experiencing a virtual reality full-time or part-time may exist.

If technology continues to advance in this direction, such a virtual reality could achieve a level of complexity, interest, and pleasure such that many people may choose to live in it rather than in the real world.

Whether a physical body can survive for a full lifetime (or longer) in such a pod is an open question.

While sufficient nutrients and air are provided a body could potentially remain in a state of stasis for some time, although some degree of physical exercise or movement would seem important to keep the body healthy for an extended period.

Wealthy people may be able to choose to pay a fee and have their body cared for, for the rest of their lives while they explore seemingly endless virtual worlds.

I think this is more likely than the possibility of individual human consciousness being uploaded into a computer mainframe to live eternally, as some science fiction writers have imagined.

Whether a life lived in a virtual world is the "right" type of life to live should be an individual choice.

Before choosing, it would be wise to experiment with living in such a world before signing one's life away.

A useful addition to such a virtual world would be a switch within that world, that would allow people experiencing it to signal their intent to leave so that those overseeing the program could create the appropriate conditions to let them out.