Why some men die young

When men lose in love they sometimes die, through a kind of death wish or evensuicide. It's not uncommon. 

There are others, seemingly happy in their relationship, but still having some kind of deep existential angst. They may also die. 

But do young, happy people die? 

Occasionally, it would seem. 

But when relatively young people die it seems to be mostly self-willed by reckless or even deadly behaviour. 

Examples: reckless driving, high risk sports, heavy drug use, especially alcohol or hard drugs, lack of physical movement, persistent negative thinking, pessimism.

But some, who fail to find a happy partnership can still find happiness, through many channels, mostly involving helping others or by being deeply creative.

Pic of David McComb, lead singer of legendary Australian 1980's rock group The Triffids.

https://youtu.be/d52LKRhBAXo?si=GOFYYvospgtMumGm

Why I joined Tucker Carlson and what I believe

II just paid 100A$+ to join the Tucker Carlson  Network for a year. I think it's good to support independent journalism that you respect. It's so rare these days. 

The big fibbers have the MSM, Google, Facebook and most government and NGOs on their side, whether through choice or (not-so-secret)* threat.

So to the know-nothings I'm now definitely "far-right", whatever that means.

But I will say what my political beliefs really are:

-No war, unless a last resort or necessary to remove Illuminati (the western global control grid) influence. Example Ukraine. Not Gaza. Which is a war crime and genocide. This isn't excusing the horrific terror attacks on Israel, but we need to look deeper at who is creating this havok and carnage and why? For example who has funded Hamas and why? How did the attackers breach Israeli security, given the global surveillance state, apparently so easily? Etc.

-Personal freedom respected, absolutely. 

-No drug laws, only behaviour laws. I.e. no attacking others or driving dangerously.

-use public funds to help those who need it and to help build society, not surveil the public, fight greed- and control- based, falsely sold, foreign wars, or any other of that dark control state nonsense.

*See Edward Snowden.

Why I joined Tucker Carlson and what I believe

I just paid 100A$+ to join the Tucker Carlson  Network for a year. I think it's good to support independent journalism that you respect.

So to the know-nothings I'm now definitely "far-right", whatever that means.

But I will say what my political beliefs really are:

-No war, unless a last resort or necessary to remove Illuminati (the western global control grid) influence. Example Ukraine.

-Personal freedom respected, absolutely. 

-No drug laws, only behaviour laws. I.e. no attacking others or driving dangerously.

-use public funds to help those who need it and to help build society, not surveil the public, fight greed based, falsely sold, foreign wars, or any of that other dark control state nonsense.

Truth tellers who go big publicly

Anyone with a public profile who's pro-truth and pro- freedom and pro- the good guys and against the bad guys will be surveilled heavily by the control web (dark) agents and may find themselves under attack. 100's of dark agents were assigned to destroy Julian Assange, his organisation and its influence. 

The bad guys still have a lot of money to harass people and destroy their lives. The US Federal Reserve Bank just keeps printing it, damaging long-term economic stability. Once the money dries up they will disappear. They're just like puppets of the control state, human NPCs. Their soul is so shrinking, it's light is almost extinguished. 

That's what working for the control grid does. It makes human robots out of once feeling beings.

The nature of the Matrix or control grid

Andrew Tate calls it "the Matrix". Some call it "the Western Empire" or "Western oligarchy" or "Western Hegemony" or the Cabal or Illuminati. 

I think the word "global control grid" sums it up well.  It's tentacles are spread from Europe and the USA through a form of colonisation, which includes the actions of the Illuminati/Cabal controlled UN and WHO, which have had drastic impacts over much of the globe. 

The sooner this control grid collapses or morphs into something truly positive and liberating, if that's possible, the better.

Hashish, opium and the free people

Hashish is a gateway drug to opium. Both of which are freely available amongst the small groups of free people who grow both for medicine, those people we call called tribes, those inventive people living away from the global Illuminati control web. The control web can't reach everywhere. They don't have the manpower. 

May the dissolution of the control grid happen sooner rather than later. Fairness and freedom are the true human inheritance. Not being shackled by so called "authorities". They are authorities in following the orders of spiritually dead men. They are lost souls. Their hell is being created unconsciously, but inevitably, from following the immoral orders of the world would-be masters. Masters of deception only, also hell bound, for sure.

Trump, the covid psyop and Operation Wardspeed

Operation warpspeed was a sucker punch to the idiots behind the covid psyop. It worked on a few levels. 

It prematurely forced the hands of the evil machinators, rushing their judgements which they hate, as they love to do everything in their own time, so that what is planned decades in advance, and is planned to unfolded a step at a time, in a predetermined pattern, was blown to smithereens. And so it threw their plans in a flurry. So fuck them, #1. 

And it made idiotic reactionaries, who worship establishment media, have to decide whether to Hate Trump or whether to Hate the new Trump vaccines. So fuck them #2. 

This would be like forcing Richard Dawkins to love both religion and love corporate science. It would blow his little black and white thinking brain, like Trump's hating reactionaries were.l blown by not know whether to assize on vaccines or Trum So (joke and) fuck them #3. 

Also, Trump has never claimed to be against vaccines. He's just aware of how many staff member's babies had been damaged by them and so he stated his own opinion, which is legal in a free country, if that's what it truly is.

Are ETs demons?

Is it only flat earthers that believe extraterrestrials are demons in disguise? 

It seems like such a backwards, medieval way to look at things. Not to mention incredibly pessimistic and showing a terrible regard for God. They made Him seem so small and pathetic. I just put it down to people possessing a small minded fear. Like small town thinking or like how a secluded stone age tribe on an island resort to attacking any visitors to their island. Obviously the visitors are demons and must be killed. It's the same limited, fear-based mental pattern. And what if they're wrong? Think of what could be gained from communication and cooperation with a society of beings far advanced spiritually and technically from our own? Or do they think God only created one planet and one dominant species to rule it? Although this is incredibly limiting it is theoretically possibile and it's belief make humans feel more important, which is an ego thing, but I think it hugely unlikely. And that's a good thing. If the soul is immortal they're had better be myriad worlds for it to experience, otherwise a deep bordem mady set in. In which case an eternity would be a very long time to endure.

My belief in an afterlife

My belief in an afterlife is not based on any religious belief, it's based on thousands of written and spoken accounts. This makes me wonder: how many atheists believe in an afterlife? Or do they all expect personal extinction upon death? Some speak of living on through their children. This is silly to me. Nobody lives on through their children. Your consciousness either continues to exist after the flesh suit is layed aside or it does not. What happens to your children is their business and if you are not conscious to know it then it's not real to you. That is just common sense. Anything else is irrational, pollyanna thinking.

Global covid tyranny used the classic scam template

A few years ago I was nearly scammed over the phone and I learned first-hand, in some detail, how the process works. First there is the injection of fear, before "authorities" lead you up to the end goal- the theft of your money. In the process you are made to feel guilty and wrong for questioning the validity of what you are being told. It is emotional manipulation all the way.

And then came the "covid pandemic" and I saw this scam template being played out on a global scale. 

I am not saying there was no novel virus or that millions weren't killed by it. But I am saying the whole process was conducted like an A1 scam, using the exact same template as the scammers on the phone, first injecting fear, introducing authorities telling you what to do and making you feel guilty for questioning the narrative. This time the end goal was not the stealing of money but rather the injecting of a novel medicine into the body using mRNA technology.

Well, I didn't do it.

To be honest I couldn't understand why anyone would take such a risk with a new technology and I can't understand why anyone still trusts the establishment after all their lies in the last recent decades.

I gave up believing in fairytales a long time ago, such as that the establishment is trustworthy, but clearly many have not.

The bizarre case of establishment serving "Christians"

One thing I find bizarre is people who claim to be Christians and yet have sold their soul to the devil by promoting the various evil agendas of the establishment. I realise many of these people are career liars but there seems to be some who actually believe that they can serve Satan and still be a Christian. Bizarre. You can't be pro-establishment and be a Christian. It's just not possible. That's unless you are incredibly stupid. Then anything is possible, in the mind of the deeply deluded. But what of the seemingly intelligent ones? What in heaven's name is going on there? Just good liars or instead in deep denial of what they are actually doing and who they are actually serving? I just wonder what mental gymnastics such folks engage in. It makes no sense to me.

Truth and AI

AI depends on the input fed in. Garbage in = garbage out. That's why I have no faith in it because the world is awash with lies, including those things "commonly agreed upon". It takes a human being with a heightened sense of discernment, life experience, ability to read body language and a broad range of intellectual knowledge to sort the wheat from the chaff. Like Barry Long used to say: "all I speak is truth and love" and that's what I aspire to. I will never seek it in a godless, soulless machine, programmed by God knows who. Certainly not by Google, Wikipedia or the government, that's for sure. They are riddled with lies and half-truths.

How the elites control the population

The elites control large segments of the population by brainwashing, bribery and threats. So they depend on propaganda and illegally gained vast sums of money to "encourage" people to do their bidding. Their greatest enemies are those who care more about truth than money or fitting in. It is this group they attempt to turn their brainwashed minions against. For if the whole population woke up and saw the elitists for what they truly are they would be finished in a day.

Scientific understanding is always partial and biased

Many people may believe science is the most reliable arbiter of truth but in terms of people's specific beliefs it is their exposure to and understanding of a limited subset of all science performed that will determine them. 

No person has a deep understanding of all science and even supposed experts may have biases that determine which science they accept and which they reject. That's why we have continued scientific debate in all fields involving any level of complexity. 

The idea of "settled science" is too often a marketing term or it may describe an area where all accepted scientists are conditioned to share the same perspective. It doesn't mean other views are not possible or that they are "unscientific".

The vilification and attack on independent thinkers

Establishment media gives the impression that going against establishment thinking is foolish and downright dangerous. People brainwashed by this actively attack those who don't believe as they have been programmed to. They are like wind-up toys. The media winds them up with their fear-based drivel and the frightened souls who believe this nonsense then project their fear and resulting anger at people who have done nothing against them, except think and live independently of establishment dogma. 

All the dissenters generally want is to be left alone to live life in a way that is appropriate for them. They are not interested in group think and the establishment-believing under-seige mentality that is always looking for an enemy to attack.

God's will, God's desire and free will

When people say "God's will" I think they generally mean God's desire. For example, humans are generally thought to have free will, in which case our life is lived according to our own will, not according to the will of a hypothesised supreme being. 

We may believe in a supreme being and we may also believe this being has a desire for us to live in harmony with love, for example. But the idea that a supreme being wills us to live a certain way makes no sense if we believe in free will. 

If we believe a creator made this reality then we could say that this reality is shaped according to the will of the creator. But we can't say that about our lives. We only will things that we can control. The things we cannot control we can only have a desire about. For example, we may desire another person to love us as we love them, but we can't will it. To repeat, we can only will things we control. And if we believe in free will then no creator controls us. That's the whole point of free will and it's something few people seem to understand.

Everyone has to come to their own conclusions

It doesn't matter what I or anyone else believes. Everyone has to come to their own conclusions by doing their own research. It's good to listen and read about other people's experience of things that interest us and this can influence our own beliefs, but we need many data points to discern truth, not just one. Unless it's our own experience, in which case one data point is fine, as long as we're of sound body and mind.