Wednesday, August 22, 2018

The two main problems with the vaccine debate

1. The two sides are too hostile to one another, and disregard everything the other side says, while attacking the character of those who hold opposing views.

Because of this, both sides learn little from one another, and can get stuck in narrow and often sloppy thinking.

2. The debate is not held publicly.

Because authorities are scared of vaccine skepticism they are unable to rationally deal with it in an intelligent, open way.

And so they pretend there are no doubts over vaccines except among rabid, irrational "anti-vaxxers" whose views are said to be unscientific and way off-base.

As a result of this attitude and the hostility directed towards vaccine skeptics, the skeptics themselves project the same kind of loathing back.

Open and frank discussion would help heal this rift and would also provide the public with both sides of the story which would also help restore faith in the institutions which are currently seen as unresponsive to public concern over the issue.

A full and frank debate would shed light on the matter, revealing where more knowledge is needed, rather than the current situation where one side says all is well, no need to change and the other says the whole thing is a disaster!

Does "autism" mistakingly refer to two different underlying conditions?


Autism is diagnosed based on symptoms, so what are the underlying physical conditions that lead to those symptoms? I have heard speculation of brain damage and of natural, but eccentric, functioning.

Are we confusing two different things here? Are some diagnoses of autism actually symptoms of brain damage and others symptoms of eccentric, but perfectly natural functioning?

Perhaps a term shouldn't be employed until we understand the underlying dynamics?

As for the cause, if we are talking about brain damage, that is a topic for another day! (Although a crucially important one.)

AND AS A BONUS POINT: Who can correctly guess whether the man pictured has brain damage or autism?

Thursday, June 21, 2018

NICK CATONE - Facts a parent considering vaccinating their child needs to understand


NOTE: NICK CATONE IS A PARENT WHOSE CHILD DIED AFTER RECEIVING STANDARD RECOMMENDED VACCINES

1. I understand that the pharmaceutical company who made this vaccine has NO liability if it injures or kills my child.

2. If my child is killed or hurt by a vaccine, the public will pay through a fund created from a 75 cent tax that's added onto every vaccine given out for any damage the vaccine does. We the people pay...not the pharmaceutical companies.

2.1 I understand that there is a cap on injury/death compensation.

2.2 I understand that even if VICP admits that your child was injured or killed because of a vaccine, that is not a guarantee that they will compensate you for the injury/loss.

They have set criteria that your injury/loss must fit into in order to qualify.

3. I understand that this vaccine contains neurotoxins such as aluminum that far exceeds "safe levels" deemed by the EPA.

4. I understand that this vaccine contains carcinogenic ingredients.

Thursday, May 17, 2018

What is the vaccine push really about?


Some people think the vaccine push is about health, some think it's about money, and others think it's about control.

I think it's mostly about control and the depopulation/health deterioration program of the power elite.

Some would ask: why do the power elite wish to damage people's health?

The answer is: to make them easier to control and to make them more likely to die prematurely.

The depopulation agenda is widely accepted among truth seekers, and the power elite haven't tried too hard to disguise it.

Friday, May 11, 2018

Why natural health folk reject the tools of modern medicine


When natural health folk reject the tools of modern medicine it isn't because they are "anti-science", it's because they reject the assumptions on which modern medicine is based.

Specifically, they don't view illness as a symptom of a "lack" of pharmaceutical medicines. Instead, they connect it to other things- emotional stress, nutritional deficiency, unhealthy lifestyle, toxic poisoning, lack of rest, lack of appropriate exercise, etc., that they seek to address to regain health.  As a result they seek for cures outside the pharmaceutical sphere, in most cases.

This doesn't mean they will always reject the pharmaceutical option, but it is likely to be low on their list of cures to try.

The reason for this is their belief that the body's needs are for natural products, not synthetic ones, and that the synthetic ones are generally symptom suppressors, that are toxic, to one degree or another, and don't help health in the long run, but only harm it.

So it is not a rejection of pharmaceutical "science", it's a rejection of the philosophy behind it, and no number of glowing drug studies is likely to change that belief.

Saturday, March 31, 2018

The freedom that comes from making decisions independently of worldly authorities is wonderful...

... as then your life is truly yours to live as you please in a way that suits you, not one that suits folks pushing their own agenda, who don’t have your best interests at heart.

Tuesday, January 9, 2018

At death we lay down this tired body...

But until then we will accept our limitations and enjoy the pleasures and possibilities this body affords us...

So we can go comfortably...

Into that "good night"!