Thursday, January 26, 2017


The question isn't which party they belong to, but instead, who owns them?

Monday, January 23, 2017

Justice is either automatic or not at all

Many people believe justice is only dealt out at the end of our life by a God who observes and judges our every deed.

Others place their faith in justice in man. They hope or work for changes in social systems to bring about a fairer, more just society.

A third group see all events as just because they see them as the outworking of the Law of Attraction- a metaphysical law that is always in operation.

This Law was taught by Jesus and is being taught by many "new age" gurus though their is disagreement over exactly how it operates.

The law of attraction concept is based on the idea that what we give out, in terms of thought and action returns to us in terms of our experience. This concept or belief sees the outside world as a mirror to our inside world of thoughts and feelings.

The Law of Attraction teaches that justice is automatic and built in to our realities framework. There is no need to wait for a future life to receive justice or to wait for society to change its lumbering laws to achieve it.

The Law of Attraction is seen as one of God's unchangeable laws that keeps the universe operating in a fair, balanced and predictable way.

The existence of The Law of Attraction doesn't negate the need to create fairer social and economic systems, but it does mean that once you understand how it operates you wont be suprised by what life brings you as you will be able to trace its cause to your previous thoughts, feelings and actions.

Above: AJ Miller explains his perspective on the Law of Attraction.

Friday, January 13, 2017

High frequency sound

When I said the world was being held together by high frequency sounds, I was talking about the insects, primarily, producing their high frequency tones, also the wind in the trees, crashing waves on beaches and falling water also produce lovely tones that massage the ears and brains and help restore calm and comfort.

Thursday, January 12, 2017

Stereolab: Margarine Melodie (MUSIC)

Matthew Ward: The DNC hacks

Message 1:
January 8, 2017

We have been asked our source of information that Russian President Vladimir Putin is justified in denying his country’s involvement in the hacking of Democratic National Committee emails and those on a personal computer, which is contrary to the United States intelligence agencies’ conclusion that the Kremlin is responsible. 

Some members of our universal family living among you are in major intelligence agencies around the globe—it was the ones in US agencies who told us they hacked and released the emails—and other members have expertise in tracking hackers’ “footprints.” Our sources know that Illuminati in those various agencies report false information to breed conflict. 

The reports given to US President Barack Obama put the blame on Russia, which led to more sanctions against that country; this was in line with the Illuminati’s penchant for retaliation—they misled Obama and created more economic problems for Putin because both leaders refused to join forces with them. 

FBI Director James Comey knows who the hackers are, why they released the emails and the criminal evidence they contain; he didn’t disclose that information due to threatening pressure from the Illuminati faction behind Hillary Clinton.

Message 2:
Nov.11, 2016

Clinton supporters in the Democratic National Committee maneuvered to Mrs. Clinton the votes in critical primaries that actually were won by Bernie Sanders; thus, it was she instead of the voters’ choice who became the Democratic party nominee.

As for the FBI’s investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s hacked emails, Director James Comey bowed to pressure from Bill Clinton and other Illuminati to conclude that national security had not been compromised and using a personal server is not an indictable offense. The finger was pointed at Russia for the hacking incident.

Vladimir Putin was justified in claiming that was not Russia’s doing. Individuals in the FBI and other intelligence agencies who know the Clinton's criminal history released the emails—they felt the public had a right to know the truth about Mrs. Clinton. But Mr. Comey had kept under wraps what the emails showed: She used her Secretary of State position to garner donations to the Clinton Foundation and issue favors in return and some Foundation funds benefited terrorists.

When those individuals later discovered that Anthony Weiner’s computer contained evidence of the Clinton's involvement in a pedophile ring, they insisted that Mr. Comey reopen the investigation. Once again he gave into Clinton camp pressure and stated that none of the emails pertained to Mrs. Clinton.