It's natural to disagree!

It's natural for people to come to different conclusions about COMPLEX TOPICS. We shouldn't punish people for it!

The establishment are out of phase with nature

The establishment are out of phase with nature. One result is the ongoing assault on the planet's natural systems for the profit of a few. Another is endless war. A third is the global healthcare system.

Artificial systems promoted above natural, life-giving ones for reasons of profit, but sold as necessity.

And a planetary population mind-controlled by the very people destroying it, through their vile media, and allowing it to happen, and even cheerleading it on, because they are convinced to do so.

Brainwashing is all around

People are allergic to the word "brainwashing", as if it only happens in cults or repressive regimes.

But the truth is we are all brainwashed from cradle to grave, by many different sources and the society around us.

Only by being aware of it can we counter it.

Otherwise we will just think that the ideas being repeated over and over are indisputable facts, rather than perspectives that can be challenged.

Useful idiots/ gatekeepers of the establishment narrative

The establishment puts quite a bit of effort into mobilizing the community against the establishment's greatest threat- critical thinkers. 

Those who watch and believe their news programs will be weaponized against critical thinkers and will be programmed to attack them when they are encountered. 

These "useful idiots" are the foot soldiers of the establishment. They are also called "gatekeepers of the establishment narrative" and are symbolized by Agent Smith in the Matrix movies.

Fake search engines

When we use a search engine we want to see the search results that most closely relate to the search terms we have entered, but this doesn't happen with Google.

They just put you onto some unrelated establishment-approved pap much of the time.

It's not: "Here's what you asked for", it's "Here's what we want you to see".

So phony. So fake.

Better to use a real search engine for topics the establishment wants to hide the truth about.

Using discernment about the right-left divide

It's definitely possible to believe that Gavin McInnes (from whom the Proud Boys get their name) is a dick and that Antifa are a sad lot. 

We don't have to love everything on one side of the political spectrum and hate everything on the other side.

We can use discernment and support those politicians who have good will and integrity, no matter what "side" they are on.

Examples:

Tulsi Gabbard (D) and Rand Paul (R).

We want both "sides" of politics to be filled with good, incorruptible people.

After all, without a strong opposition governments can run amok.

Just look at Dan Andrew's Victoria.

There, opposition has been weak for years, and so he is able to destroy their economy, undermine the population's civil liberties, and strike terror into their hearts, all while remaining effectively unchallenged.

This is a situation no-one wants to end up in.

Far-right, far-left and extremists

The use of "far-right" and "far-left" as terms to smear people seems largely idiotic and random to me.

What makes someone "far"? 

Is it the belief that violence, bullying or discrimination is justified in order to change the political system or to get people to change the way they act? 

If so, then the person is dangerous, no matter what political label is applied. 

But if they don't advocate the use of force then they are not extreme, and so any label of "far" seems misplaced.

WHAT IS AN EXTREMIST?

I would say anyone who holds the view that the ends justifies the means is an extremist, no matter where on the political scale they are, and even if they are considered "esteemed" members of the establishment.

After all, many "respectable" members of the establishment push for unnecessary wars and laws that discriminate against minorities and in favor of vested interests.

I would call them extremists.

Empty "debunking" claims

It's common to see articles claiming to "debunk" one thing or another. 

Something true can never really be debunked, of course, although the claim is often made.

Too often the "debunking" consists of smearing believers and performing a shallow analysis that ignores any information which undermine the debunking case.

Very rarely does a "debunking" achieve what it sets out to do. Instead, they are often just a propaganda piece used to attack rival views and shore up support for their own, rather than any noteworthy piece of investigative journalism.

Facebook and Tribalism

Before Facebook there was no need for most people to reveal their true identity on the internet. 

Now they have, some things are better and some things are worse!

You can get a better sense of people when their identity is revealed, but anonymity has gone by the wayside and this has led to family and friendship breakdowns because of people speaking out during politically divided times.

This is unfortunate, but an inevitable part of the invisible being made visible or the private being made public.

I think at their heart most people want similar things but social pressures have forced or encouraged many into tribes of thought that see other tribes as their enemy.

Each tribe defines their enemy, by exaggerating their own worst fears about them.

Few of these are realistic, but that's how the divide continues and grows.

All the while the fat cats laugh at our foolishness, while they sneak out with the cash.

David Icke, Jews and the global plot

I don't think there is a Jewish plot to enslave the world and neither does David Icke, although he is smeared as an "anti-semite" by the ignorant attack dogs who police alternative thought.

There IS a plot to enslave every man, woman and child, of course, but its authorship is not limited to one nation or belief, I don't think.

I see its leadership as being primarily occultists, not Jews, Christians or Moslems.

These are religions the elites have promoted for the public - in their authoritarian form, of course.

Anything which encourages control over the many by the few is used by these people.

These people are called "elitists" or "the power elite", and are at the top of the pyramid of power for each society.

There are many power elites, of course, all over the globe, in all areas of economic significance, but a global cabal seems to have formed around at least one of these groups.

They are said to control the money flow around the world and are involved in every significant area of our lives.

In recent times another group is said to have emerged, to challenge this group.

This second group is said to have Putin at its head.

Some call them the "gold" group.

They fight the "red" group, whose power is centralised in Europe and America.

For more on the last few points read here:

https://zingdad.com/publications/books/the-ascension-papers-book-3/170-an-open-letter-to-the-illuminati-bloodline-families

Barack Obama and the Illuminati - MATTHEW WARD

Former president Obama, the highly evolved soul that agreed to go to Earth and become US president, was light-filled when he embodied and his light has not diminished one iota. Persons who recognize this truth are not fooled by the photo-shopped pictures and fabricated films disseminated by dark ones to besmirch his character.

What is true is that due to Illuminati threats to kill his family if he didn’t cooperate, he gave in to demands that he was told were nonnegotiable. One was appointing Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and another was endorsing her in the 2016 presidential race—the threats against his family are ongoing. An example where Illuminati in Congress and beyond had their way is the Affordable Care Act. Mr. Obama had to abandon his comprehensive plan that included a single payer insurance provision and push the healthcare program designed by the heads of insurance and pharmaceutical companies. Wrinkled brow and graying hair are the physical signs of his emotional and mental struggle that required compromising spiritual and moral integrity to protect his family.

Matthew Ward
Jan 8, 2020.

Do Not Let Them Train You - CAITLIN JOHNSTONE

Do Not Let Them Train You

Do not let the news man train you how to see.

Do not let the pundit train you how to feel.

Do not let the teacher train you how to think.

Do not let the preacher train you how to love.

Do not let the banker train you how to value.

Do not let Hollywood train you how to be.

Don't let them train you.

They were appointed by the powerful to teach you how to live

in a world that is small, too small for wild humans.

Too small for humans who haven't been house trained,

groomed, spayed and neutered,

and taught parlor tricks

like how to ignore life's intrinsic breathtaking majesty.

Too small for humans who perceive their own boundlessness,

their own vast unpredictable inner wildernesses,

their own beauty,

their own holiness,

their own worthiness,

their own innate equality

with those holding their leash.

So they train us.

They train us to believe the world fits neatly

into flat, finite conceptual boxes.

That life is predictable, that our nature is well-mapped.

That we live in a 2-D colorless cage

from which there can be no escape

and about which everything is known.

As though narrative could even touch this blazing cacophony,

let alone encapsulate it.

They are lying to you, my beloved.

They are lying each and every time they open their pixelated mouths.

This life is so much more than they will ever allow you to believe.

So very immense.

So very unexplored.

So very unpredictable.

So very juicy.

So very sexy.

So very, very, very beautiful.

The unknown unknowns dwarf the known unknowns,

and the known unknowns dwarf the knowns.

But they will never let you know this.

So don't ask their permission.

Take off that leash, wild apeling.

Unblinker those eyes and unshackle those legs.

Those chains are not there to protect you from the world, my beloved.

They are there to protect your trainers

from you.

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/do-not-let-them-train-you-336da93ff569

Robert F Kennedy Jr on Dr Judy Mikovits

From: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr:

“Judy Mikovits is among her generation’s most accomplished scientists. She joined NIH in 1980 as a Postdoctoral Scholar in Molecular Virology at the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Mikovits began a 20-year collaboration with Frank Ruscetti, a pioneer in the field of human retro virology. She helped Dr Russetti isolate the HIV virus + link it to #AIDS in 1983. Her NIH boss Anthony Fauci delayed publication of that critical paper for 6 months to let his protégé Robert Gallo replicate, publish and claim credit. The delay in mass HIV testing let AIDS further spread around the globe + helped Fauci win promotion to director NIAID.

In 2006, Dr Mikovits became director of Whittemore Peterson Institute for Neuro-Immune Disease + collaborated with Dr Ruscetti searching for the cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome which suddenly became epidemic in the 1980s. The male dominated medical community dismissed CFS as psychosomatic “yuppie flu" caused when fragile females cracked in corporate jobs.

Dr. Mikovits discovered that 67% of affected women carried a virus—called Xenotropic Murine Leukemia related Virus—that appeared in healthy women only 4% of the time.

XMRV is also associated with prostate, breast, ovarian cancers, leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Many women with XMRV bore children with autism.
In 2009, Drs. Mikovits and Ruscetti published their explosive findings in the journal Science. But the question remained: How was XMRV getting into people?

Other researchers linked the first CFS outbreak to a polio vaccine given to doctors and nurses that resulted in the "1934 Los Angeles County Hospital Epidemic." That vaccine was cultivated on pulverized mouse brains. Retroviruses from dead animals can survive in cell lines and permanently contaminate vaccines.

Dr Mikovits’ studies suggested that the XMRV Virus was present in the MMR, Polio + Encephalitis vaccines given to American children + soldiers.
Dr Fauci ordered Mikovits to keep her mouth shut. When she refused, he illegally confiscated her work books and hard drives, drove her from government work + blackballed her from receiving NIH grants ending her science career. XMRV remains in American vaccines.”

For Those Who Doubt the Plandemic Movie
I researched some of the “facts” going around claiming to have “debunked” the movie, which are being regurgitated by many who prefer to remain asleep and won’t put the effort in to research things themselves. Here is what I found along with all of my supporting sources.

1. Dr. Anthony Fauci has worked at the National Institute of Health (NIH) since 1968 and has been a Director with the organization since 1984, “both as a scientist and as the head of the NIAID at the NIH”. A simple Wikipedia search resolved that one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Fauci

2. The NIH was one of the institutions funding the original study published in 10/23/2009, which Dr. Mikovits participated in and makes reference to in the Plandemic movie. Dr. Fauci worked at and continues to work at the NIH, one of the primary financial contributors to the study as one of it’s most senior directors, so you can indeed say that Dr. Judy Mikovits was in fact working for Dr. Fauci. I have downloaded the complete original study and saved for you to access here (highlights on page 3 denote Dr. Judy Mikovits’s participation and her employing firm) (highlights on page 6 indicate the institutions which provided the funding for the study):
https://drive.google.com/open...

3. The study was challenged in 2010, when other researches could not replicate their findings and in September 2010, the original team, inclusive of Dr. Judy Mikovits issued an official response supporting their work.
https://drive.google.com/open...

4. After which the original study was partially and then subsequently fully retracted (a very rare move in science). The partial retraction document states that two of the co-authors, Robert Silverman and Das Gupta (whom the original study listed as working for the Department of Cancer Biology) re-analyzed the samples they used and discovered that they had been contaminated. Please refer back to the first link provided herein, for item #1 showing the original study, indicates on the document that it has since been retracted.
5. That she was arrested and a quote from the prosecuting district attorney, that said the charges were dropped because "there were issues with the witnesses".
https://www.sciencemag.org/.../criminal-charges-dropped...
6. In September 2012, Dr. Judy Mikovits and a team of other scientists conducted another study replicating the original one and published their findings, ultimately resolving the scientific communities dispute over the original work.
https://twp.duke.edu/.../file-attachments/1441.full_.pdf
https://www.sciencemag.org/.../final-study-confirms-virus...
https://mbio.asm.org/content/3/5/e00266-12
7. As previously shared in another post, Dr. Fauci does in fact hold a large number of patents related to HIV (as Dr. Judy Mikovits states in the video). He also holds numerous patents related to the Novel Coronavirus.
https://patents.justia.com/search?q=Anthony+Fauci
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB113383825463714813
Other Interesting and Related Facts:
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has appointed Dr. Anthony Fauci to their Vaccination Action Plan.
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/.../Global-Health-Leaders...
Bill Gates personally owns a number vaccine related patents (amongst many other interesting and unrelated patents):
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/william-gates
Pirbright, a company funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation owns European protecting replication of a variant gene of an avian infectious bronchitis virus.

European Patent# 3 172 319 B1 https://data.epo.org/publication-server/pdf-document...

Here is proof that Pirbright is in fact funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/.../2013/11/OPP1098099
Pirbright also a US patent on the Coronavirus (you will need to scroll down quite a bit to see the owner and inventor they really covered every base on this patent.
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10130701

Vanderbilt University owns a large number of Coronavirus vaccine patents:
https://patents.justia.com/patent/7452542

Dr. Anthony Fauci and the Director of Vanderbilt University go back..
Here you see them lobbying together: https://news.vumc.org/tag/anthony-fauci/
Here it mentions how they went to college together:
https://news.vumc.org/tag/anthony-fauci/

Also as previously shared in another post, the polio vaccines the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation tested on children in the Africa, causing an outbreak of Polio from the vaccine itself and paralysis on the children.
https://thebulletin.org/.../vaccine-causing-polio-in.../
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=Vm5FMUUJdtY

Letter sent by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano to President Donald Trump

Mr. President,

In recent months we have been witnessing the formation of two opposing sides that I would call Biblical: the children of light and the children of darkness. The children of light constitute the most conspicuous part of humanity, while the children of darkness represent an absolute minority. And yet the former are the object of a sort of discrimination which places them in a situation of moral inferiority with respect to their adversaries, who often hold strategic positions in government, in politics, in the economy and in the media. In an apparently inexplicable way, the good are held hostage by the wicked and by those who help them either out of self-interest or fearfulness.

These two sides, which have a Biblical nature, follow the clear separation between the offspring of the Woman and the offspring of the Serpent. On the one hand there are those who, although they have a thousand defects and weaknesses, are motivated by the desire to do good, to be honest, to raise a family, to engage in work, to give prosperity to their homeland, to help the needy, and, in obedience to the Law of God, to merit the Kingdom of Heaven. On the other hand, there are those who serve themselves, who do not hold any moral principles, who want to demolish the family and the nation, exploit workers to make themselves unduly wealthy, foment internal divisions and wars, and accumulate power and money: for them the fallacious illusion of temporal well-being will one day – if they do not repent – yield to the terrible fate that awaits them, far from God, in eternal damnation.

In society, Mr. President, these two opposing realities co-exist as eternal enemies, just as God and Satan are eternal enemies. And it appears that the children of darkness – whom we may easily identify with the deep state which you wisely oppose and which is fiercely waging war against you in these days – have decided to show their cards, so to speak, by now revealing their plans. They seem to be so certain of already having everything under control that they have laid aside that circumspection that until now had at least partially concealed their true intentions. The investigations already under way will reveal the true responsibility of those who managed the Covid emergency not only in the area of health care but also in politics, the economy, and the media. We will probably find that in this colossal operation of social engineering there are people who have decided the fate of humanity, arrogating to themselves the right to act against the will of citizens and their representatives in the governments of nations.

We will also discover that the riots in these days were provoked by those who, seeing that the virus is inevitably fading and that the social alarm of the pandemic is waning, necessarily have had to provoke civil disturbances, because they would be followed by repression which, although legitimate, could be condemned as an unjustified aggression against the population. The same thing is also happening in Europe, in perfect synchrony. It is quite clear that the use of street protests is instrumental to the purposes of those who would like to see someone elected in the upcoming presidential elections who embodies the goals of the deep state and who expresses those goals faithfully and with conviction. It will not be surprising if, in a few months, we learn once again that hidden behind these acts of vandalism and violence there are those who hope to profit from the dissolution of the social order so as to build a world without freedom: Solve et Coagula, as the Masonic adage teaches.

Although it may seem disconcerting, the opposing alignments I have described are also found in religious circles. There are faithful Shepherds who care for the flock of Christ, but there are also mercenary infidels who seek to scatter the flock and hand the sheep over to be devoured by ravenous wolves. It is not surprising that these mercenaries are allies of the children of darkness and hate the children of light: just as there is a deep state, there is also a deep church that betrays its duties and forswears its proper commitments before God. Thus the Invisible Enemy, whom good rulers fight against in public affairs, is also fought against by good shepherds in the ecclesiastical sphere. It is a spiritual battle, which I spoke about in my recent Appeal which was published on May 8.

For the first time, the United States has in you a President who courageously defends the right to life, who is not ashamed to denounce the persecution of Christians throughout the world, who speaks of Jesus Christ and the right of citizens to freedom of worship. Your participation in the March for Life, and more recently your proclamation of the month of April as National Child Abuse Prevention Month, are actions that confirm which side you wish to fight on. And I dare to believe that both of us are on the same side in this battle, albeit with different weapons.

For this reason, I believe that the attack to which you were subjected after your visit to the National Shrine of Saint John Paul II is part of the orchestrated media narrative which seeks not to fight racism and bring social order, but to aggravate dispositions; not to bring justice, but to legitimize violence and crime; not to serve the truth, but to favor one political faction. And it is disconcerting that there are Bishops – such as those whom I recently denounced – who, by their words, prove that they are aligned on the opposing side. They are subservient to the deep state, to globalism, to aligned thought, to the New World Order which they invoke ever more frequently in the name of a universal brotherhood which has nothing Christian about it, but which evokes the Masonic ideals of those want to dominate the world by driving God out of the courts, out of schools, out of families, and perhaps even out of churches.

The American people are mature and have now understood how much the mainstream media does not want to spread the truth but seeks to silence and distort it, spreading the lie that is useful for the purposes of their masters. However, it is important that the good – who are the majority – wake up from their sluggishness and do not accept being deceived by a minority of dishonest people with unavowable purposes. It is necessary that the good, the children of light, come together and make their voices heard. What more effective way is there to do this, Mr. President, than by prayer, asking the Lord to protect you, the United States, and all of humanity from this enormous attack of the Enemy? Before the power of prayer, the deceptions of the children of darkness will collapse, their plots will be revealed, their betrayal will be shown, their frightening power will end in nothing, brought to light and exposed for what it is: an infernal deception.

Mr. President, my prayer is constantly turned to the beloved American nation, where I had the privilege and honor of being sent by Pope Benedict XVI as Apostolic Nuncio. In this dramatic and decisive hour for all of humanity, I am praying for you and also for all those who are at your side in the government of the United States. I trust that the American people are united with me and you in prayer to Almighty God.

United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity, I bless you and the First Lady, the beloved American nation, and all men and women of good will.

Carlo Maria Viganò

Game of Thrones Meme (spoiler alert)

Australian rugby player Sione Katoa on why he refused a flu shot

NRL star Sione Katoa reveals why he refuses to get the flu shot - and says he won't let any of his three young kids be vaccinated.

“I’ve had a few people contact me and ask why I declined the flu shot and wanted to share my reasons behind it, particularly now with one of our closest mates @brycecartwright6 and teammate Brian being stood down.

Lately I’ve seen journalists, reporters and mainstream media creating a divide between the community, the fans and the NRL by constantly shaming and bullying NRL players and their families who stand for freedom of choice.

We acknowledge that the flu shot has the ability to result in serious adverse reactions and has also claimed lives. In 2018, the step father of a friend sadly passed away within 48 hours of his flu shot. He was an adult man, with no underlying health conditions. What if this were to happen to our family, or yours? Why are people so quick to advocate for “herd immunity” and not acknowledge vaccine injury/death? There are plenty of families within the NRL alone that suffer from vaccine injury.

We used to be very pro-vaxx and judged those who chose not to vaccinate. Those judgements quickly passed as soon as vaccines caused health issues for our eldest son, Chase. He was constantly sick after his shots, resulting in many trips to the hospital and doctors office. Our son was helpless and never getting any better, so we reached out for a second opinion which lead us down the path of holistic health. After seeking advice from medical professionals and seeing the positive impact that it had on our sons health, we made the informed decision to no longer vaccinate ourselves or our children.

Our friends and family who vaccinate themselves and their children respect and understand our decision with vaccination. And we respect theirs. No, they aren’t scared to be around us, our kids play with theirs and we can also have open conversations about vaccines without judgement and that’s how it should be.

We stand for FREEDOM OF CHOICE and what we choose should not be made a public matter and cause outrage in the media and community. Everyone should be entitled to choose what they do, or do not inject into their body because WHEN THERE IS RISK THERE MUST BE CHOICE.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/CAAUtLnFBPb/?igshid=191mepl5bhywl&fbclid=IwAR2I4DcUlqYqxLsGWaX2zBrEIchAqfwNu6jEwdub0JK5GL8gybPaL1paEkk

1. "Cult busters" are only proving allegiance to their own cult. Discuss.

My understanding of life is forever evolving.

Don't let other people's thoughts about you dictate your life.

Biased journalism

Biased journalism isn't necessarily a matter of printing untruths, although opinions are often shared uncritically as truth, but of focusing only on those things that promote one's own preferred agenda or cause.

Such biased journalism is the norm in mainstream and alternative outlets and it's important for us to realise that.

Some biases will be held by 80% of the population or more.

That's one reason why popularity can't be used as a measure of truth, no matter how seemingly knowledgable the group involved may be.

We are all subject to bias due to the societies we grow up in.

There is no escaping it!

Who are the anti-vaxxers?

What the general public have been taught to call "anti-vaxxers" are a pretty heterogeneous group.

Some are "never-vaxxers", refusing vaccines forever more, some are "sometimes vaxxers", open to the possibility of a receiving a vaccine one day, but not currently interested, and some are "safe vaxxers", pushing for vaccines to continue to exist, but in safer forms than today.

On a leadership, or public notoriety level, there is division between those pushing for safer vaccines and those who want them either abandoned or restricted to people who are able to provide informed consent (i.e. adults), very similar to modern popular views on circumcision.

The one thing these groups have in common is an opposition to vaccine mandates of any kind and to all types of bullying and discrimination based on a person's vaccine status.

WHO and the blind followers of the blind leaders

The head of the World Health Organisation is NOT a doctor. 

According to the "wisdom" of some people this means he should NOT be listened to when giving health advice, particularly when related to vaccines.

LMFAO.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣

What a crazy, disjointed world we live in!

But folks who say such things are just unconscious hypocrites. Any authority the TV tells them to trust they follow.

They don't really have any rules they follow in life apart from:

FOLLOW PRE-FAB AUTHORITY BLINDLY.

That's why we have a population of sick and diseased people, unable to think for themselves.

They are followers of the blind leaders only, unable and unwilling to put the pieces of the jigsaw together and think for themselves. 

Sad!

The Luciferian establishment

Some people think the establishment has good elements and bad elements and to some extent that is true. But the reality is, any group that supports wars of conquest is evil. End of story.

As so all elements of the establishment which tacitly support one another suffer from guilt by association.

Lies and deceit are their ways now.

That's how political power works.

Not by telling the truth but by wholesale deception.

It's the Luciferian way, which these people have accepted as their path, and which enables them to ride roughshod over the lives of others.

Don't follow them and don't be one of them, unless darkness and pain is what you seek!

Democracy and censorship

As is being made clear by the frightened mob and their frightened owners democracy can only survive if everybody expressing an opinion contrary to the establishment is censored.

Or is it the other way around?

That democracy can only survive if free speech is maintained?

And what is this democracy anyway? Has anyone got one that actually works?

I haven't seen any!

To be truly conservative

To be truly conservative means to be in touch with the flow of natural and human events over the millennia, and to act from that understanding.

Social conservatism is fake conservatism in my view.

Those who mindlessly follow social trends are actually radical from the longer view, because their behavior is completely out of touch with natural rhythms, making them ill-fitting to the earth.

Nothing that is unsustainable is conservative.

All unsustainable industries are radical and owned by radical, out of touch, selfish people.

People in touch with the long rhythms don't destroy the earth or create products that lead to such destruction.

True conservatives follow the natural rhythms, not the false habits laid down by perverted elitists who would own us all if we gave them the chance!

Science and God

The idea that science and God are at loggerheads is a nonsense to me.

Science is one method to explore God's universe and come to an understanding of it. It isn't opposed to God at all, it's just an investigation of what God (or gods) have made, that is all!

And the idea that science has "disproved God" or made it clear that a creator God isn't needed to create a universe is pure fantasy, in my view!

When governments become tyrannical

Governments become tyrannical when they attempt to gain control of a person's body or mind, or to steal their property.

Some of the worst examples include: the draft, mandatory medication, including fluoride and vaccines (or discriminating against those who won't receive them), communist insurgencies that steal people's property and kill community leaders, asset seizure laws that target people not found guilty of any crime and compulsory government schooling.

In terms of thought crimes- any time the government tells people what to think they are guilty of it. That's not their role. Governments role is to provide and manage social services for those who need them, not to tell people what to think. We can manage that for ourselves, thank you very much!

When in Rome do as the Romans do

"Conform on the outside, not on the inside."

"When in Rome, do as the Roman's do."

I practice social distancing as expected when in a shop, but I do this not because of any fear of a virus, but because this is now accepted as "good manners".

I don't want to make anyone uncomfortable, unnecessarily. 

But because I don't see the virus as a serious threat, or one that I can control, my thoughts have been on other things since the panic began- things that ARE in my control.

I apologise to those who see this thing as a big deal when I don't.

The whole thing is just not something that interests me.

In fact, I avoid news media because of its ungodly focus on this thing.

It's just so boring and repetitive and has nothing to do with living a rich and fulfilling life.

So I choose life and not death, by focusing on things that are life promoting, not the drone of the death-obsessed media and those caught in its clutches.

How safe is ethylmercury used in vaccines?

It is said by mainstream sources that the form of mercury (ethylmercury) used in vaccines as a disinfectant leaves the body quickly, making it relatively safe.

It is also said by others that this type of mercury leaves the blood reasonably quickly because much of it ends up in the brain (and the gut?).

In other words, they say it isn't leaving the body like the mainstream sources say, but instead is accumulating in the brain and causing potentially ongoing mental issues.

He's my question:

What is the evidence to support either hypothesis?

Accountability in decision making

One of the problems of this world is a lack of accountability. So often we don't know who makes important decisions and those involved are unwilling to put their name to the decisions they make. For example, any time someone is censored on Facebook or YouTube the person who made the decision should be named and their email address given. This is never done. Weak people hide in darkness and avoid taking responsibility for what they do.

We need organisational structures where every decision made has a person's name attached so we can speak with them and understand the reasoning behind their decision. Better still, if we know who manages something we can communicate with them directly before any decision is made that effects us.

This is how transparent organisations that truly serve the public interest operate.

Every other organisation should be avoided at all costs as they can't be trusted to tell the truth, rather they are hiding behind their wall of secrecy, which suggests they are up to no good and unwilling to take responsibility for it!

Understanding the vaccine debate

By Joel Edwards

Source:

https://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/vaccines-cognitive-dissonance-inside-the-pro-vaxxer-mind

Along with the belief that vaccines are “safe and effective” come other beliefs. There is a belief that vaccines do not cause autism, that vaccine reactions are rare, and so on. This is what the public is told about vaccines through the mainstream media. Despite these beliefs having no basis in scientific reality, they are continually reinforced by propaganda-laden journalism.

Only six corporations control the mainstream media. Though their popularity is waning, the “mainstream media” still dominates news coverage. Many people still rely on news outlets like CNN, Fox News, USA Today, NY Times, etc. Expecting journalistic integrity, instead we are told what their advertisers want us to hear.

Seventy percent of mainstream media’s advertising revenue comes from the pharmaceutical industry. That is why there are so many people under the fervent belief that vaccines have no connection with autism. These slogans are fundamentally no different than Got Milk?, McDonald’s I’m Loving It, or Coca Cola’s Can’t Beat The Real Thing. The nefarious thing is that consumers of mass media have no idea that their news reports are filled with slogans that Big Pharma wants them to hear.

Trusting in “Big Brother”

There is a prevailing belief that adverse reactions to vaccines are rare, because if they weren’t “they” wouldn’t let “them” sell dangerous vaccines. (It is true that vaccines are unprofitable in a free market. Vaccines cripple, injure and kill far too many people to be subject to the same standards of safety as everything else bought and sold in the U.S. This is why vaccine manufacturers are immune to all liability). The rational goes on. Even if vaccine manufacturers could make money selling dirty vaccines, the government would never allow it (or so goes the belief). These beliefs are not based on a critical analysis of vaccines; these beliefs are based on sound bites (even among doctors). This is why the primary message from the anti-vaccine movement has been, “Do your research.”

You Want Me To Do What?

Research is analogous to homework, and it hasn’t been very popular with Westerners.

 

“Research” is typically limited to watching the news, or reading the newspaper. Internet research is distrusted, simply because most people do not know how to check the veracity of their sources. Opinions are often formed on limited information and motivated by fear. Fear is a powerful motivator; politicians play on the public’s fears to get elected and to elicit cooperation in undermining civil liberties. Pharmaceutical companies use fear tactics to influence public opinion. Medical freedoms are more easily taken away when people are frightened. Such tactics are highly effective. The public is told if vaccination rates fall, we will see a return of global epidemics, such as the Spanish Flu or small pox. Under the shadow of this misinformation, pro-vaxxers are forming the best opinions they can, given the information available to them.

When offered peer-reviewed scientific articles, the pro-vaxxers dig in their heels.

We Are Not Going Away

Inevitably, pro-vaxxers encounter objections to vaccination. These counter arguments range from unrefined views that vaccines are bad to highly sophisticated scientific objections. The vaccine debate is framed by the mainstream media as an argument between those in the know (scientists and doctors) and those who are anti-science, stupid, or even superstitious. In truth, there are numerous doctors and scientists opposed to vaccines. There is a debate among independent scientists and industry funded scientists, not among scientifically literate and the scientifically illiterate, as the mainstream media would have us believe.

Disagreements Happen, but Are They Necessarily Productive?

No one enjoys being wrong, but many of us do enjoy proving someone else wrong. Given this basic proclivity of human nature, pro-vaccine advocates and anti-vaccine activists are bound to get into arguments. These arguments tend to have predictable beginnings and endings. Dale Carnegie may have said it best when he wrote:

Nine times out of ten, an argument ends with each of the contestants more firmly convinced than ever that he is absolutely right.

You can’t win an argument. You can’t because if you lose it, you lose it; and if you win it, you lose it. Why? Well, suppose you triumph over the other man and shoot his argument full of holes and prove that he is non compos mentis. Then what? You will feel fine. But what about him? You have made him feel inferior. You have hurt his pride. He will resent your triumph.”

 

A vaccine argument usually begins with the same declarations “show me the peer reviewed academic articles” or demands of “show me the data”, even in instances when data wouldn’t really apply (such as case studies, which provide anecdotal evidence). When pro-vaxxers’ demands for scientific evidence are met, predictable objections arise.

No One Needs a “Degree from Google University”; You Just Need To Be Able To Work a Keyboard

The information is out there, and it is not hard to find. When offered peer-reviewed scientific articles, the pro-vaxxers dig in their heels. They were, after all, under the impression that such studies didn’t exist, and they do not wish to profess their ignorance. The average Westerner has not read peer-reviewed academic anything since college, but when debating the merits of vaccines most vaccine advocates are self-appointed armchair experts. It is uncomfortable to admit that your ignorance far exceeds your knowledge, so for this reason, a know-it-all approach is often adopted. If they are incapable or unwilling to attack the research based on its inadequacies (no research is perfect) they will attack the source, questioning its credibility even though they never even glanced at the information. The other option is to attack the person providing the evidence, because a meaningful exchange of ideas is beyond the maturity of most people, regardless of their views.

When pro-vaxxers are shown evidence of government corruption they simply dismiss the evidence as conspiracy theories. As if by the suggestion that something conspiratorial is taking place; that alone invalidates the argument.

Conspiracies are Actually Quite Commonplace

Webster’s defines a conspiracy as a secret plan made by two or more people to do something that is harmful or illegal, or the act of secretly planning to do something that is harmful or illegal. This may sound like a far-fetched concern to some, but it happens all the time; especially in regards to vaccines.

Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski filed lawsuits in 2010 alleging that Merck falsified data by adding animal antibodies to blood samples. In order to protect their government approved monopoly, Merck had to demonstrate that their vaccine produced antibodies with a 95% rate of success, so they defrauded the U.S. government because that is easier than making a vaccine that reliably produces an antibody response.

William Thompson was a senior epidemiologist at the CDC, and he co-authored research on the MMR vaccine for the CDC in 2004. Years later he revealed data that showed that the MMR vaccine strongly correlates with autism in African American males and that the CDC concealed this information. For months the story was ignored by the mainstream media, and then only briefly reported on.

Judy Milkovitz made the discovery that destroyed her career. She found that at least 30% of our vaccines are contaminated with gamma retroviruses. This contamination is associated with autism, chronic fatigue syndrome, Parkinson’s, Lou Gehrig’s disease, and Alzheimer’s. She was under the naïve impression that her due diligence (all of her work being properly reviewed, meticulously documented, etc.) would protect her from persecution, but she was mistaken.

US Measles Decline 1912-1975

An objective analysis reveals that conspiracies happen all the time, and that there must be something nefarious going on when it comes to vaccines. But objectivity is the exception and not the rule, the pro-vaccination advocate has never been objective about vaccines if they were, they couldn’t possibly condone their use.

A Mind Already Made Up

UK Pertussis graph

A confirmation bias was in place long ago, rooted in a need to trust one’s doctor. Desperately wanting to outsource responsibility for their health, patients base their medical decisions on their doctors’ recommendations, and informed consent is at the convenience of the physician. If their doctor recommends it, it’s good enough for them. (Does the doctor really want to lose a sale by explaining risk in an honest and straightforward manner?)

 

Boston Smallpox

The pro-vaccine advocate doesn’t want to do the research. They want to be able to rely on their physician. Life and death is frightening, even terrifying. Something must be done to reduce the risk of death, so we must immunize against the threat of disease. After all, germs are everywhere. Inside the pro-vaccination mind is the devout belief that vaccination reduces the complications associated with living. It’s what most doctors recommend, so it must be the right thing to do. Ultimately, pro-vaccination logic falls prey to a logical fallacy: the appeal to authority.

Washington Measles 1920-1982

When asked why they support vaccination, the vaccine advocate responds with incredulity. There is no in between to them. Vaccines are above reproach. You are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and if you’re anti-vaccine you’re against science. Vaccines are a sacrament to the pro-vaccine mind, science is the religion, and doctors are the priests. Vaccines are what saved us from the dark ages of disease, or so they believe.

Seeing What They Want To See

UK Pertussis graph

When shown the data, graphs that show historical rates of mortality and morbidity, pro-vaccine advocates see what they want to see. Anyone who doesn’t harbor deep-seated prejudices can see that it was improvements in sanitation and nutrition, not immunization, that eradicated disease, unless of course one is looking at a skewed graph created for vaccine propaganda.

Check out more graphs at Dissolving Illusions – Disease, Vaccines, and Forgotten History.

Conclusion

UK Measles graph

Our medical system abandoned its own scientific and medical ethics decades ago. In order for science to flourish, a free exchange of ideas must take place; there is nothing in the scientific method that condones the persecution of scientists that hold differing scientific views. Most of our greatest scientific discoveries were once ridiculed, taking years to be accepted as mainstream scientific theory. Continental Drift which was later developed into Plate Tectonic Theory, Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Galileo’s discovery of a round earth and Ignaz Semmelweis’ declaration that hygiene can save lives were met with abject persecution. In our current era of scientific illiteracy, many of these theories are still poorly understood. For instance, there are still thousands of people who ardently believe the world is flat.

Inside the pro-vaccination mind, there is a desire for simplicity and safety. It is easier to believe that vaccines are safe and effective (the Supreme Court has ruled them unavoidably unsafe) than it is to do the research. Despite feigning scientific literacy, the pro-vaxxer is unfamiliar with the counter arguments to vaccination, they simply want to shut down any discourse on vaccine safety. If anyone criticizes anything about vaccines they are deemed “anti-science”. In reality, it is the pro-vaxxer who suffers from delusional views. This is called anosognosia or lack of awareness of a deficit.

 

Isn’t it time to wake up? Multi-national pharmaceutical corporations don’t care about your health; they care about the bottom line. The government is not looking out for our best interests. Government workers are looking out for their own interests-as long as bribery of elected officials remains legal (aka lobbying) we will always have a corrupt system of government in place, regardless of which political party is in control. We need to be savvy consumers of news media and check their sources. We should know all about what we put into our bodies and have the freedom to decide. We are being herded into a future without freedom, not herd immunity. Check out How To Detoxify and Heal From Vaccinations – For Adults and Children and Doctor’s Against Vaccines.

Recommended Reading:

Scientists Against Vaccines – Hear From Those Who Have Done the Research

A Burden of Guilt – Learning About Vaccine Dangers the Hard Way

Why Antivaxxers Don’t Vaccinate

Cultural Cognition and Alternative Medicine

Sources:

Dissolving Illusions

The Tiniest Ones: Doctors Ignore Data on Premies – Kelly Brogan, M.D.

Limbic System: The Center of Emotions – Julio Rocha de Amaral, M.D. and Jorge Martins de Oliveira, M.D.

Vaccine Whistleblowers File to Compel Merck to Respond to Federal Lawsuit – Health Impact News

Merck accused of stonewalling in mumps vaccine antitrust lawsuit – Reuters

How to Win Friends and Influence People – Dale Carnegie

     

Celebrities don’t always lend their voice to political debates; after all, they are likely to alienate some of their fan base. There are some issues that hit so close to home that as mothers, fathers, and concerned citizens celebrities speak out, regardless of how controversial and divisive the issue may be. The rise of medical tyranny in America has been promoting more celebrities to speak out against vaccines and to speak out against vaccine mandates.

Have you read part one yet? Check out Celebrities Who Have Spoken Out Against Vaccines, and also see what Doctors and Scientists have to say about vaccines as well.

Chuck Norris

While most mainstream news covers presidential campaigns or economic conditions, the feds are going under the radar and your skin – literally – with something that could be detrimental to your children’s and your health. And news just broke about the cover-up, but few, if any, agencies passed along the wire.

…But the truth is, as the NAA reports, “There are over 1,500 studies and papers documenting the hypoallergenicity and toxicity of thimerosal (ethylmercury) have existed for decades,” with most recent research revealing commonness of speech delays and tics. The NAA added, “Recent studies have confirmed the association between the use of thimerosal and autism has moved from ‘biologically plausible’ [in 2001] to a ‘biological certainty.’”

…But the facts are, according to a recent PRNewswire report, despite that thimerosal is not used in vaccines for measles, mumps, oral polio, yellow fever or tuberculosis, it is still found in in many diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, and influenza (or flu) vaccines, especially in Third-World countries.

… Dr. Jose Dorea, professor of nutritional sciences from the Universidad de Brasilia, hit the health nail right on the head when he recently said, “The evidence continues to mount that mercury in vaccines is not safe, that negative effects happen even with vaccine levels of exposure. We must end the use of thimerosal as soon as possible. No pregnant mother or child should have to trade getting mercury injected into them for the prevention of an infectious disease.”

So buyer, beware! Or should I say, booster, beware! Don’t check your brain in at the door of your family’s health, nutrition or medical care. And don’t ever be afraid to ask the hard questions of your health practitioners, like, “What are the exact ingredients in that syringe?”

It is your health, and they are your children, entrusted to you by God, so be bold in ensuring their safety and welfare. You still have the constitutional right to refuse any health care you deem unnecessary.

Kirstie Alley made her opinions on mandatory vaccines known by her Twitter account.

— Miranda Bailey (@mirandambailey) October 9, 2015

As vaccine mandates are increasing every years and healthcare workers live with the threat that they will be fired if they don’t get a flu shot, it is essential for Americans to educate themselves about our loss of informed consent rights. We need adequate scientific research and clinical evidence for any public health policy, not an attack on personal belief or medical exemptions to vaccination by special interest groups, which benefit pharmaceutical companies. It is time for a true, unbiased investigation into vaccine science, policy, ethics, and law. – Vaccine Epidemic (cover quote)

Snoop Dogg has some colorful, choice words to describe his thoughts and feelings on vaccines; explicit language warning.

“Fuck that, I’m not getting no flu shots cause its flu season. Nigga, I’m going to take my some fucking lemons, some honey, and oranges. Nigga, grandma gots the remedy. Holla at yo grandma, nigga. Holla at someone old in your family. You don’t need that shot, they shooting some shit in yo ass. I’m cool. I don’t want none of that. I’m straight. I think they shooting, shooting some control in you, some shit to take control of you. When they have your mind, body, and soul, they going to slow you down a bit. I don’t trust it. I’m cool.”

Esai Morales

In response to someone commenting on an interview that he’s on the wrong side of the vaccine debate:

No, Andres. You are. You really need to study their actual history and why we even have had exemptions to begin with for so long and what actually drove the draconian legislation that now removes all crucial parental rights over a policy ostensibly in the public interest but mostly serving the private backers of this lucrative practice with zero liability for its product; even if it is proven to kill or maim you or your child as is done again and again and again using specially formed and secret ‘vaccine courts’. I can see why you’d think the way you do for I did too… until I did some major digging and found where the conflicts of interests really lied, and boy how they lied. wink emoticon

Irrefutable proof that influenza vaccines routinely given to pregnant women still contain mercury. (Twitter)

Conclusion

To those who want to be informed, the truth about vaccines is out there. If the government seeks to force medications on the population then we owe it to ourselves to know everything about these pharmaceuticals and to learn both sides of the vaccine debate.

If vaccines are so effective then why would they have to be mandatory in order for them to work?

Why must we get boosters for the same shot over and over again, only to catch the disease that the vaccine was supposed to prevent anyway?

If vaccines are so safe, why can’t vaccine manufacturers be sued for damages caused by their product?

Esai Morales and many of these other celebrities took the time to do some major digging. Ultimately this research changed his mind about vaccines. If enough of us learn the truth, we can be set free from medical tyranny. Our health and our freedoms are too important to entrust to the care of others.

Where we place our attention is the world we inhabit.

Fear of death makes people weak

People are made weak when they fear death. This is one reason why the philosophy of materialism is so widely promoted.

It gives people no hope of a life after death, which makes them easier to control- just raise the fear of death to achieve that.

Another other way to control people is to convince them that only those who obey your commands will go to heaven while everybody else goes to a hell of eternal punishment.

To tell the truth about the afterlife would have the opposite effect and remove people's fear of death or of earthly authority, which would severely weaken the ability of power elites to control the population.

Robert F Kennedy Jr on Bill Gates and vaccines

Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vacc ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy—the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism. 

Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans. 

Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines. 

In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court. 

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.

During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, "We are guinea pigs for drug makers"

Nelson Mandela's formar Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates' philantropic practises as "ruthless" and immoral".

In 2010,  Gates committed $ 10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines "could reduce population". In 2014, Kenya's Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony "tetanus" vaccine campaign.

Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.

After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.

Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.

A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO's popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children.

Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.

Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of - hijacking WHO's agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.

They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish - that good health only comes in a syringe.

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical -industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates' power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.

In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children."

The role of public servants

Public SERVANTS are not there to give orders, they're there to help people who need it. If they were designed to give orders they would be called public COMMANDERS, not public SERVANTS.

Are Bill and Melinda Gates Illuminati? MATTHEW WARD

Q. Are Bill and Melinda Gates Illuminati?  They want to vaccinate everyone in Africa and maybe everywhere else—are they really unaware that vaccines are used to spread disease or do they know and are as dark as the people behind it?  

A. They are Illuminati by the power of their money and corporate influence, yes, but by an intention to dominate the world, no.  Bill has been so focused on technology, almost to the exclusion of knowing Illuminati activities other than leadership in governments, mega-corporations and banking, that only recently he became aware of their diabolic motives, including the purpose for mandated vaccinations.  When he learned about the autism-like effects of vaccinations in infants, lab-designed viruses put in vaccines, and programmed microchips in some inoculations, the Gates foundations’ health care funding swiftly but silently changed accordingly.  The Gateses are not dark souls—they were fence-straddlers who ignored the darkness in their affiliations and business dealings, then “saw the light” and now are being guided by conscience.

MATTHEW WARD, through SUZY WARD
https://www.matthewbooks.com/july-15-2006/

I'm just one voice. If it makes sense great. If it doesn't... Move on!

"The science is settled"

"The science is settled" is the modern equivalent to "God has spoken" and is a hollow appeal to authority for people who don't understand an issue enough to make a valid point, in their attempts to shut down a debate that would only embarrass them.

So many people's beliefs are manufactured and not their own...

Instead they are products of propaganda they mistake for truth telling.

Jadon Christoff - the mind virus

Questions and Facts That Open The Mind About Our Troubling Times....

72,000 people die in NY City every year. In NY State 160,000 die every year. Same this year, same last year. In the United States 2.6 million people die every year. Same this year, same last year. The human mind is naturally wired to fear death, in order to increase its chances of survival. The human mind is also naturally wired to focus more intently on anything negative, as opposed to anything pleasant, as part of its natural survival based neurological reaction system. When something is negative, fearful and involves death......the human mind instantly focuses in as hard as it can. This cycle triggers the fight, flight or freeze system. This limbic system reaction lowers IQ to child like states and instantly starts to mark people, places and things as "friend" or "foe". "Safe" or "dangerous". This is the only grading system our fear based survival system holds. Are we marking the proper items as "safe" today? Are we marking the proper items as "dangerous". 

Propaganda research proves humans react extremely quickly and irrationally to fear, death and panic. Is the media reporting regular deaths, in regular populations, by regular diseases as irregular? Are we seeing regular death rates reported as irregular during the winter months, where a lack of sunlight increases natural death every year, regardless of any other factor? Does the public know the coronavirus belongs to the same family as the common cold and that the common cold often does unfortunately cause the death of our most unhealthy and age vulnerable every year? Do people know the pneumonia (losing one's ability to breathe properly) is the most common metabolic breakdown before death, regardless of diagnosed disease at the time of death?  

If you're in fear, most people can't ask rational questions because they react instead of think, due to the way the human brain is designed. 53 million people die every year on this planet. In Italy 1800 people die every day. Same this year, same last year. In China 20,000 die every day. Same this year, same last year. Where you live, people die every day. Why don't you ask yourself if the death rate is going up from last year and start there. Also ask yourself why the governments keep the liquor stores open when alcohol kills 3 million people world wide every year. Why are fast food restaurants open when junk food kills 11 million every year? Why are cigarettes for sale if smoking kills 7 million every year? If the government wanted to flatten the curve and keep the hospitals "slower", why not tackle the 3 biggest causes of death on the planet...smoking, junk food and alcohol killing 21 million people combined per year on the planet? Why do the hospitals have smoking areas, serve junk food and say nothing as liquor stores remain open? Remember that a question opens the mind and that a statement closes the mind. All your governments and media outlets are doing are making statements because they know statements close your mind. Statements combined with fear shut downs collective questioning and logical inquiry.

Here's a question. What is democide? You might want to look up what that means. Democide is the word used when one's own government starts to kill its own citizens and you might want to ask yourself...."how many citizens have died at the hands of their own governments, over the last 120 years?" and you may also want to ask "how exactly did governments organize the killing of their own citizens and how did those processes start?" Well they've always started in the exact same ways. The governments purposely cause an issue out of nothing, mark their own citizens as the enemy and mark themselves as the savior, governments then use weaponized fear to make citizens turn on each other and the media drives the fearful humans to believe various untruths for reasons only known by the ruling 1%. There are reasons as well why governments cull their own citizens on a regular basis but you would have to start investigating and asking questions to find out. Thinking is what they don't want. Asking logical questions is what they don't want. Peace and prosperity for all is what they don't want. Start asking questions. You'll be glad you did.

People who have strong belief in things they know little about are called...

... cultists!

Non-interference

People have the right to believe whatever they want, no matter how ludicrous it seems to us. The thing they don't have the right to do is interfere with the free will of another. That means not forcing anything on anyone who doesn't want it.

"The law of non-interference" is a simple law that is said to govern life in the higher spheres. No other law is needed. It covers all the sins we can commit against one another.

The moral person never interferes with the decision making process of another, forcing their hand. This is called "being respectful".

The denial of sentience and animal experimentation

There was incentive for humans to deny sentience to other creatures. "No sentience" meant we didn't have to care for them. Their well-being wasn't important, as there was "no-one home" to register suffering and so they could be treated like machines.

This gave birth to animal experimentation. A dark chapter in human history. Animals treated like machines to discover knowledge soaked in blood. Think Mengel, the Dr Death of the Nazi death camps. Same mindset. The denial of the reality of others, leading to atrocity and needless suffering.

Although we no longer deny sentience to our animal friends, we still often treat them with less than the consideration they deserve, as dependent on our actions as they are.

Nothing is proof of anything except the thing, itself.

That is, "what is" is proof of what is, not what was or what will be.

These are interpolations that can't be proven.

Only those with a history of assault or stealing should be in prison.

For everybody else a more tailored approach is in order.

For prison is cruel and unusual punishment, for animal or man, and few deserve it who receive it.

It should be saved for the cruelest of the human tribe.

Those who cannot be trusted to live peacefully in our world.

Socialised medicine and nature healers

Critics of drug-based medicine who tend to favour more natural approaches can have mixed feelings about socialised medicine. 

After all, their favourite medicines and healers don't tend to be covered by a drug-based care system.

So they are essentially contributing to a system they have little belief in.

Few doubt the value of modern emergency medicine but many have doubts about chronic care.

These things aren't reflected in current government health policy, which favours high-tech, big business driven medicine, with little support for more natural, low-tech approaches.

Corporatism is the establishment. Power flowing to big money, the top end of town.

"Keep your head down. Go along to get along."

When a person is emotionally invested in a con job, all you can say is: "Good luck!"

Media outlets work under the skull and crossbones flag...

Spreading news of fear and death far and wide!

Every decision I make is ethical, even if...

The ethics are bad!

Death is the withdrawal of life, through...

insufficient conditions!

Sometimes you've got to accept the confusion, and not rush...

To a conclusion!

No room for MIND in materialism

There's no room for MIND in materialism. 

Everything is cause and effect, starting with the big bang. 

[Except for quantum physics]

Our brains are subject to the same laws, chemical and physical, as everything else in the universe that we perceive, and the MIND is just an apparent expression of this mechanistic process, with no meaning of it's own beyond the physical processes that birthed it.

It's like the music coming from a gramaphone- totally subject in its expression to the physical device that creates it.

MATERIALISM is the dominant philosophy of academia. The commonly perceived elite of human minds, relied upon to give an accurate picture of reality.