Finding out what really happened to Kurt Cobain

Speaking of the Cobain case, people generally don't buy a shotgun to commit suicide. They buy a hand gun. Far easier to manage. Shotguns are for self-protection. You point them AWAY from yourself, as their scatter gun action makes them useful for a novice and just the sight and sound of them being cocked will scare burglars and prowlers away.

Also, no one high on opioids is going to want to hurt themselves. They are feeling too good for that. But someone strung out, in withdrawal might. 

It's all common sense, but people throw that out the window when they hear lies repeated as "the official story". That's how brainwashed people have become to trust these "official stories". 

But such folks are incredibly naive, with no knowledge of history, which repeats itself again and again, where such lies, initially believed by a gullible public, are later revealed to be total fabrications with no resemblance to truth.

For those interested in the truth of the Cobain case watching "Soaked in Bleach" (with an open mind) is a good place to start.

The documentary "Kurt and Courtney" also sheds some light on the matter.

And no, questioning the "official findings" does not make you an unhinged conspiracy theorist or a misogynist. Don't let the slings and arrows of the gatekeepers keep you away from seeking truth in any matter. 

Be courageous and ignore the barking dogs who are just afraid of people not believing as they were trained to do.

They are just frightened children at heart.

The use of the terms left and right in politics

The terms "left" and "right" in political terms are too generalised and associated with too many varying things to have any real meaning. 

We can talk about what role government and the free market have, but to lump people into left and right just seems too primitive to meam anything. 

It's degrading for a person of any sophistication or integrity to be associated with, or use, such unsophisticated language.

 It's the language of small children at best and society would be wise to move away from such meaningless terms.

Who has the moral right to promote vaccines?

I would say a person has a right to promote a vaccine if they have studied it under a microscope, or spectrum analyser, or whatever is needed to identify what is in a random sample of a random batch given to the public, and are 100% sure they can identify what is in it and exactly what the ingredient's effects will be on any human subject they expect it to be injected into. 

In any other case any vaccine promotion is both irresponsible and immoral. 

That's one reason why I don't promote products. I just don't know enough about them to do so. Few, if any people do. You'd need to keep watch on every stage of the manufacturing process to see what goes in and what effect it might have on human biology. Nobody does this, as far I'm aware, who is truly independent. At least no-one that the establishment will mention, except probably to call them conspiracy theorists or anti-vaxxers.

And just because a vaccine is tested on mice or even a group of people it doesn't mean the vaccine that is mass manufactured and given to the public will have the same ingredients as the one tested.

This is taken on trust, of companies that are convicted felons and whose history is one of dedication to profits over health. And sicker people = bigger profits, sadly.

Nobody tests the ingredients in vaccines who is truly independent with regularity that I know of except a lab in Italy (Corvelva). And what they find is that what is in the vaccines given to the public is not what is listed in the ingredient list. Far from it.

https://www.corvelva.it/index.php

People who have faith in the establishment

Anyone who has faith in the establishment will find my viewpoints offensive, as I will find theirs. 

But I understand it to some extent, because we all start out trusting the establishment to one degree or another, until we mature and start seeing things through the eyes of an awakened adult, instead of a child.

(Picture of comedian George Carlin who was an awake adult.)

The establishment works through the left and right and is completely untrustworthy

The establishment is the establishment, whether it works through "the left" or "the right". 

And the establishment is completely untrustworthy, as events over the last 20+ years have shown (and probably throughout history as well). 

The establishment's interest is in maintaining and expanding power and control, not in sharing truth, unless it serves their interests. 

Mark Twain, Jesus, Bill Hicks, George Carlin, Jimmy Dore, Bill Cooper and many other speakers of truth have known this and spoken of it eloquently and often humorously over the years.

How the evil ones try to avoid karmic retribution

The evil ones know they will carry the karmic burden of their actions if they force people to do their dirty work for them, so instead they "encourage" people, through blackmail, bribery and peer pressure, to do it instead. 

For example: if you don't do this thing we want you to do you will lose your livelihood, ability to move freely, social standing, etc. 

So the people still have a choice and therefore carry the karmic burden of the choice they make, even if they would have preferred not to have made it. It's a kind of devil's bargain, which the evil ones have perfected over the years.

That being said, it still won't stop the evil one's from being magnetized to the lower realms of the spirit world upon their death, because evil likes company and their low vibrations will draw them to where they belong.

Physics, multiple universes and the "God machine"

Some scientists like to hypothesise an endless number of universes so they can "explain" how this one happens to have all the physical laws required for life to "evolve" (from rocks!)

As if there is some kind of machine that creates universes ad infinitum and this one just happens by chance to be "life friendly".

The idea of a conscious creator who knows what it's doing is too much for them to handle. 

It's too close to religion, which many of them seem to hate, hence their "God machine", universe spewing idea, with zero evidence for it, as far as I know.

But there are some in the area of physics willing to admit that the evidence for design is overwhelming and to try to explain it away is the definition of unscientific thinking.

Incentives in a profit driven health industry

We are taught to believe that the "health" industry (which consists, and is mostly controlled by drug companies making hundreds of billions of dollars off drug sales) wants to make us all well so we won't need their products. 

And they're also the ones who make the vaccines given to babies, kids and adults, so we supposedly won't need their services down the road to deal with illness, chronic or acute.

This is pollyanna thinking, sadly.

It just doesn't reflect the world we are living in.

Profit maximization remains the goal of a profit driven industry, not childish notions of a profit-sacrificing benevolence, that just doesn't exist, except in the fantasy world of the widespread propaganda we are fed.

Revolution and the Jan 6 Capitol building invasion

The people who walked through the Capitol building on Jan 6 probably thought they were part of a winning revolution. But unless the military is on your side there is no revolution. 

And if the military intervened, as they should given the gross corruption in Washington DC and their anti-American behaviour (the military's role being to protect against "enemies DOMESTIC and foreign"), it would be called a coup. 

The media/establishment propaganda wing must fall or be taken out of the control of the evil ones, so that the public are not continually being fed lies and given a false picture of reality.

So a few things need to happen to erase the disgusting deep state and their wholly negative impact on the world. 

How this will be organised will be interesting to see.

The people who walked through the Capitol building on Jan 6 probably thought they were part of a winning revolution. But unless the military is on your side there is no revolution. 

And if the military intervened, as they should given the gross corruption in Washington DC and their anti-American behaviour (the military's role being to protect against "enemies DOMESTIC and foreign"), it would be called a coup. 

The media/establishment propaganda wing must fall or be taken out of the control of the evil ones, so that the public are not continually being fed lies and given a false picture of reality.

So a few things need to happen to erase the disgusting deep state and their wholly negative impact on the world. 

How this will be organised will be interesting to see.

Fraud in the US Presidential election

Many people say the last US presidential election was a fraud. But from what I understand, they all are.

Not necessarily meaning they are always pre-decided, but that the process is controlled by power brokers behind the scenes who leave little or nothing to chance (or attempt not to- I think their manipulators failed in the Trump election).

How else would you explain an obviously demented man being sworn in as "President"?

It's absolutely ludicrous to see that as the democratic choice of the people- the best person fit for the job.  No-one even attended his rallies. He was a half-insane yawn, who made no sense at all. Literally half the population would have been a better fit, mentally, at least.

True incentives in the "health" industry

We are taught to believe that the "health" industry, which consists primarily of drug companies making hundreds of billions of dollars off drug sales, wants to make us all well so we won't need their products. 

And they're also the ones who make the vaccines given to babies, kids and adults, so we supposedly won't need their services down the road to deal with illness, chronic or acute.

This is pollyanna thinking, sadly.

It just doesn't reflect the world we are living in.

Profit maximization remains the goal of a profit driven industry, not pollyanna notions of a profit-sacrificing benevolence that just doesn't exist, except the widespread propaganda we are fed.

My fundamental beliefs about life

When I was young I was interested in finding out the answers to the biggest questions. Now I'm happy with the answers that I found. But that doesn't mean I have some fixed path in life, or determine the direction of my life, but it does affect how I view things. 

That view is ever evolving, but certain rocks of belief are what they stand on. 

These beliefs are not the sole result of things written in books, but of the written word and lived experience combined.

The fundamental belief I have is that existence is good in the deepest sense (beyond relative good and bad), and so are WE, and so whatever happens happens in that context.

At any given time our experience may not be pleasant, it could even be devastating or torturous, but that devastation or torture eventually ends and brings us back to a fundamentally positive relationship with the world and ourselves, if that is the conclusion we have come to.

The law of attraction

I accept the law of attraction as fact due to lived experience, but I think our primary attractor is our emotions, not our thoughts, although the two are closely linked.

In other words "feeling you are a millionaire" makes you a millionaire, but trying to think your way into being a millionaire won't work if you don't feel it.

And "feeling it" means believing it, not trying to believe it, which means you don't.

On a daily, practical level it means when you feel good, good things happen, and when you feel bad, bad things happen.

It's very simple.

But our mind gets to choose where we focus our attention and this is connected to our feelings, with causation going both ways.

But our life is mainly defined by our feelings and they determine whether we think life is worth living or not.

Lessons I have learnt about drug withdrawal

Having been on a cascade of drugs since a severe insomnia event over 2 years ago I have learnt the following lessons:

1. When it comes to drug withdrawal don't trust any advice from doctors, psychiatrists, mental health workers or any internet source except user groups (such as on Facebook and elsewhere) and the Ashton manual. And don't be in a hurry. The patient must drive the process and if you rush you may end up paying the price years later.

2. Try not to add additional drugs to what you are already on except in an emergency. It will just make coming off everything that more difficult. 

3. Use a liquid taper if possible and the lower you go the slower you should reduce your dosage. Drug dosage tends to have a logarithmic relationship to effect. Meaning a given milligram change in a small dose will have a much larger effect than the same milligram change in a higher dose.

3. Read the article below by the founder of the survivingantidepressants website before beginning your taper. It's a good overview. Then read the Ashton Manual. From there you will have a solid base.

4. Best not to use any psychiatric drug (i.e. benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, etc.) in the first place, particularly on a regular basis (here I reference benzodiazepines, z-drugs and barbiturates/muscle relaxants such as Soma), unless you are faced with a real emergency: e.g. debilitating insomnia, severe depression or uncontrollable mania, for example. All drugs have unwanted side effects and can be very difficult to come off of.

5. This is not medical advice. It's just my experience. Make of it what you will. I won't say however to consult your health provider unless you have one of the rare ones that understands these issues. If you can find such a rare soul, good luck to you. But of course if you have a prescribing doctor then they must be on board.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2045125321991274

Democracy is a facade

The fact that democracies are just a facade and that countries are run by (often interlocking)  groups of power elites has become increasingly obvious in recent years. 

In the supposed home of democracy their last presidential election was a sick joke, with the resulting (mentally deficient) president being selected for the people rather than by them. 

And how much say does the population have over laws that are created? And who writes them? Who wrote the Patriot Act, a massive document that no politician who voted on it read, and that appeared shortly after the 911 terrorist attacks, impacting lives everywhere? 

No, democracy is a sham. But it's time for the people to take back control of their countries from the hands of these monsters who think they can have everything their own selfish and often very destructive way.