I would say a person has a right to promote a vaccine if they have studied it under a microscope, or spectrum analyser, or whatever is needed to identify what is in a random sample of a random batch given to the public, and are 100% sure they can identify what is in it and exactly what the ingredient's effects will be on any human subject they expect it to be injected into.
In any other case any vaccine promotion is both irresponsible and immoral.
That's one reason why I don't promote products. I just don't know enough about them to do so. Few, if any people do. You'd need to keep watch on every stage of the manufacturing process to see what goes in and what effect it might have on human biology. Nobody does this, as far I'm aware, who is truly independent. At least no-one that the establishment will mention, except probably to call them conspiracy theorists or anti-vaxxers.
And just because a vaccine is tested on mice or even a group of people it doesn't mean the vaccine that is mass manufactured and given to the public will have the same ingredients as the one tested.
This is taken on trust, of companies that are convicted felons and whose history is one of dedication to profits over health. And sicker people = bigger profits, sadly.
Nobody tests the ingredients in vaccines who is truly independent with regularity that I know of except a lab in Italy (Corvelva). And what they find is that what is in the vaccines given to the public is not what is listed in the ingredient list. Far from it.
https://www.corvelva.it/index.php
No comments:
Post a Comment