The non-conspiracy theory view of the world

The "non-conspiracy theory" view of the world is pure pollyanna. It is that the world the mass media presents is the real world, instead of just being what vested interests want people to believe. 

It's a very childish notion. Instead the reality is that the real world is nothing like this pollyanna world. The real world is a place where vested interests control the public's mind to maximise the benefit for them.

It's a matter of confusing PR with truth, "and we know they're miles apart".

This reality is what people have been trying to wake people up to for decades. Those willing to venture outside the gated walls of the controlled media.

In recent years Putin has been talking about it and of course he's the "bad guy" for not going along with the charade and joining the corrupt western empire in divvying up the riches of the world.

King Charles and the spiritual path

I appreciate King Charles (the English one, not the Carlton footballer, but him too) for his interest in organic gardening. I also appreciate his refined outer nature. But what he gets up to in private and what he really thinks I don't really know. 

He is not my Lord. I could say Jesus is my Lord, and in a sense He is, but I'm open to the possibility that there may be other high spiritual beings who are my direct superiors and with whom I consult about my future evolutionary path, through the various spirit and physical realms. 

I know for a fact that I've got a long way to go, but let's hope there's some fun down the road. Suffering on earth may build character but it wears you out.

Viewing life too simplistically

Too many people see things in overly simplified  terms. For example, if you were a NAZI you were bad. Well, I don't think every one of the young soldiers fighting under Hitler for Germany were all evil or headed to "hell". Just as not every soldier who was part of the Allied forces was good and heading to "heaven". Life is not that simple or banal. We are responsible for our actions, but the circumstances that surround them need also be taken into account. 

The Bible says "Thou Shalt Not Kill". Does that mean every soldier who took a life, even in the attempt to save others is eternally damned? I'm not saying killing is ever justified. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. And any taking of human life may well be a blot on our soul history but it doesn't mean we should be destroyed and not allowed future evolution.

As the Islamists say Allah is all Merciful. We've just got to learn from mistakes. And the more we learn the more possible mistakes we see and hopefully avoid!

Working in corrupt industries

The big money earning industries on this earth tend to be highly corrupt, but that doesn't mean good people don't work in those industries and get good results. 

Governments at the highest levels tend to be highly corrupt, for example, but that doesn't make all government workers bad or doing "evil" work. They could be acting very beneficially for their community. 

The same goes for people in religions, for example. 

There is no "pure" industry, or if there is they are too unprofitable to attract the attention of immoral profiteers, such as the "Rockefellers" of this world. 

The banking industry may be very corrupt and yet that doesn't make the bank manager or bank teller a bad person. They could be doing very useful work. 

We just need to be sure the work we perform is moral in nature. We can't control the larger forces at play in our world.

The transparent evil of the establishment

If I offend people by speaking the truth... tough titties. 

It's time people were woken up from the pollyanna dream the media has placed around them. 

"Wake up and smell the thorns", as the bad guy in Meet Joe Black said. 

Ain't no substantive change for good going to happen in this world while people are living in a dream world created by PR firms the establishment hire to make them look good and to crap on the reputations of those they deem a threat.

A change of leadership is essential from the current satanists to the men and women of God. 

And I'm not talking about religion, because most of that is fake. After all, everything the establishment touch turns to mud. They twist everything. They ruin the good and lionise the bad.

No, I'm talking about genuine, well-meaning people. The kind the establishment media like to hate and smear endlessly. Linking them to Russia, calling them "conspiracy theorists", etc. The establishment are the masters of lies and projection. But not so good that a huge number of people can't see right through them.

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you

Kurt Cobain once sang "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you" and the reverse is also true: "just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you". 

After all, who would know of the targeting powers of "The Powers That Be"? Can they target millions? Perhaps. They certainly surveillance millions using computers. It also depends on what we mean by "target". 

Clearly the things they put on the nightly news and plant in the newspapers (think "operation mockingbird") and on websites could be said to target whoever they can reach. 

Whether we believe the stories that are planted will depend upon our current world view. Some will believe freely and unquestioningly, while others will not. 

The non-believers or dissenters are encouraged to be targeted by the believers by giving them derogatory names we are all familiar with such as "anti-vaxxer", "conspiracy theorist", "far right", "extremist", "denialist" etc. and saying they are the cause of our troubles. They infer that if only we would all follow the orders issued from the authorities all would be well.

However the dissenters see it in reverse. That is, they think that all would be well (or at least much better) if fewer people took notice of the authorities.

These are the folk who have faith in the individual more than the state.  After all, it is harder to individually corrupt millions than it is to corrupt a small handful of powerful people. 

So these folk encourage the devolution or deconcentration of power, rather than the consolidation of power into the hands of an increasingly smaller number.

Among such dissenting folk are the anarchists and the voluntaryists. They don't recognise external authorities, or at least they don't recognise the right of others to rule over them and force anything on them. They see themselves as being a "sovereign individual".

They can choose to live a low key life, not stirring up trouble or they can take actions that may put them in the spotlight of the social controllers. Think Bill Cooper, for one. He died for his beliefs and sharing them widely, although some would say he was his own worst enemy. But on the night of his death he seemed to believe that if the police took him in alive he may never be free again, or that a staged shooting may happen and so when they lured him from his home under false pretenses once he realised he fled back home. But he never made it inside. A gunfight broke out with local police, ending with him dead. A martyr to some, a paranoid conspiracy theorist to others.

Scammers make you out to be the bad guy

There seems to be a trend among scammers to make you out to be the bad guy for not going along with their scams. It pisses me off and destroys any chance of a fruitful business relationship. 

I don't like being taken advantage of, especially when the other person has the upper hand. 

Like Stuart Wilde once said, before any business meeting remind yourself that you don't need the deal. Otherwise you'll end up paying "wanting it" tax.

And unscrupulous people will try to take advantage of that.

These people are the scum of the earth in my opinion, but as I said they will make it out as if it's your fault for not agreeing to their new terms, once you have already agreed to and paid for an existing deal.

Possible reasons for the drug war

The drug war was exported around the world by the United Nations using bribery and probably threats as well, if I understand correctly.

Was its purpose to protect the lucrative legal drug industry or to enhance profits for illegal drug cartels?

It certainly has nothing to do with health.

After all, alcohol and cigarettes kill far more people than any other drugs and yet they are legal in most countries. They may even come close to the amount of deaths caused by medical error, or medicine use in general.

Laws are always sold as being for the public's good, but this is rare, instead they are usually implemented to protect the economic interests of the rich and powerful.

I have also heard it said that the implementation of laws prohibiting the use of medicinal plants by traditional people is to attack their culture and is clearly racist in tone..

A G&T drunk by the leisure class is fine, but ganja smoked at the end of the day by workers is not.

Not to mention the banning of the use of all the visionary herbs, like ayahuasca and psilocybin mushrooms.

Heaven forbid people stick their head outside the matrix (of lies) for a while and get a different and broader perspective on things.

That could threaten the status quo that has led to untold amounts of wealth being concentrated in the hands of a few, while most of the world struggle to make ends meet.

Opioids and Jordan Peterson's miraculous akathisia recovery

A comment on Jordan Peterson's miraculous akathisia recovery:

The thing about the Peterson case is the family don't claim any med healed him, only diet and avoiding most medications while tapering off those he was on, and eventually coming off all of them.

A specific opioid (hydromorphone), that helped him so much, was used purely as a bridging measure to enable him to taper off all other medications, particularly a benzodiazepine, which can be almost impossible to taper in such cases, without causing a huge akathisia flare up, and then he tapered off it last. 

The article suggests he is med free now, now that the hydromorphone and diet changes have done their job.

He tried many, many meds in his 3 years with severe akathisia, with only mirtazapine, and more significantly, hydromorphone helping.

If they had their time again they would have gone straight for the opiate after the initial akathisia set in, rather than experimenting with any other psych meds, which only triggered his akathisia more, his daughter said. Not only was it by far the most effective, but also turned out to be the safest of the medications used. 

Not much is known of the value of hydromorphone and morphine (the two opioids she said were the best suited and easiest to taper from) in treating akathisia, a notoriously difficult condition to treat, in the medical community and there is much fear around opioids in general, which is unfortunate given their potential value in treating such cases.

Hopefully his tale becoming more widely known may help fill the information gap around opiod treatment of akathisia and help many people with this common and extremely distressing condition find help ftom their health providers, rather from suffering for months or years in pain.

The best drugs are natural and (unfortunately) illegal

Arguably the two most useful drugs in existence are natural ones- cannabis for mood enhancement and pain relief and opium for pain that cannabis cannot help. And yet both of these things are illegal in "civilised society", while the 2 deadliest drugs, cigarettes and alcohol, are freely available. 

Opium is said to be too addictive to make legal but that is treating adults like children. And there's no rational reason for cannabis to be illegal, except for protection of the various legal drug monopolies.

The opioid crisis in America is primarily due to the use of strong synthetic opioids, like fentanyl, that can kill an unsuspecting user and the need for many patients dependent on opioids to have to source them illegally, where quality and strength cannot be guaranteed and overdose is likely.

Generally, safer opioids can be used for an extended period of time with minimal side effects, although their use is generally for short-term strong pain, but they are also used for chronic pain, particularly in the elderly, and help enable them to sleep and regenerate without resorting to dangerous sedatives such as benzodiazepines and over the counter antihistamines.

Tribes throughout the world grow cannabis and opium for the use of members of the tribe who need them because of their incredible medical powers.

But in the west we must beg a doctor for a drug to help us and often they don't listen to the patient and prescribe something they like which is synthetic, with far more adverse effects than the natural substances mentioned.

These synthetic drugs are thought to be safe and non-addictive, but the reality is many of them result in physical dependence, making coming off them difficult and painful.

And in a large proportion of cases they just don't work. So the patient must often go on and off multiple drugs in the hope of finding one that helps. Meanwhile often experiencing terrible side effects from the drugs they are trialling.

A comment on Jordan Peterson's akathisia cure

A comment on Jordan Peterson's cure from severe, protracted akathisia:

"The thing about the Peterson case is they don't claim any med healed him, only diet and avoiding the vast majority of medications and tapering off the rest he was on, and eventually all of them. 

The specific opioid he used (hydrocodone) was as an effective bridging measure to enable him to taper off all other medications, particularly benzodiazepines, without a huge akathisia flare up and then he successfully tapered off it last.

It was a near miraculous recovery, after 3 years of torture and meeting with doctors from across the world who were unable to help.

Now, within a short space of time he is functional again."

Mental and physical health

The mind and body are part of an interweaving system, and so "mental illness" can come from physical causes, such as poisoning, poor diet or insomnia, just as "physical illness" can come from unhealthy thought patterns or trauma.

There is no separation between body and mind and so there is some truth to the idea that mental illness is caused by "chemical imbalances". 

But the drug treatments for mental illness are likely to only enhance these imbalances because the synthetic products used are not native to the body and do not coalesce well with it and can create greater imbalance, particularly if too quickly removed after extended use.

There is more money in chemical, patentable medicine on a mass scale than natural medicine, and at times it may be the best short-term treatment option, but as a long-term approach to health it is generally a failure.

(Satanic) establishment control of the internet

When the internet was overtaken by the (satanic) establishment some years back it meant their control of the public mind was nearly complete. 

It took a good decade or so of popular internet use before the satanists gained control of the major corporations and websites that came to dominate the internet. 

Control of the most "authoritative" voices on the internet, like control of TV, radio and newspapers, gave extra credibility to the "official stories" the satanists wanted the public to believe. 

Such stories had come under threat by a growing alternative community that had been brought together and strengthened by the democratic information source that the internet was before the gradual takeover.

Now it's just a shadow of that place. Like a cultured garden, where everything is made to look neat and tidy, and where all the "serious voices" seem to agree about the important matters. 

But in reality it is an artificial place, full of lies passed off as accepted truths. It generates a false impression of reality, just like TV. Only in non-censored comment sections do we get any idea of what people really think. And often those thoughts are too scary for some of the mind control organisations to allow and so they either censor them or shut them down completely.

In other, less travelled areas of the internet, the truth can still be found about things the establishment would prefer were kept hidden, with only their whitewashed versions publicly known.

It makes me laugh that the supposedly most powerful people in the world are so worried about other people's opinions, and shows how fragile their supposed power really is that they must go to such extreme lengths to control our thoughts.

It makes them the slaves they wish us to be.

And the other funny thing is, for a good portion of us, it doesn't even work. All those billions spent on mind control and the effort to dumb us all down, when, in true fact, they are dumbest of the lot, as transparent as glass to those of us with knowledge and perception. 

Just a bunch of sad f*cks, killing time until they make their way to the hellish realms of the afterlife, while we live our lives ignoring all the BS their puppets come out with, and making no effort to control anyone and so therefore WE ARE FREE, while they are slaves to their idiotic greed and need to control EVERYTHING.

A review of "Love and Death: The Murder of Kurt Cobain" by SJ

A review by SJ of 

"Love and Death, The Murder of Kurt Cobain by Ian Halperin and Max Wallace"

Disturbing, thought provoking, and beyond tragic if it's accurate.

Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2016

Speaking as a person who never purchased a Nirvana album or idolized Kurt Cobain, but rather a person who simply recognizes a very small handful of Nirvana songs, I'd like to think I went into this read with a completely open mind, with no hidden agenda to defend or point the finger at either side of the "suicide vs murder" debate. I had watched the "Soaked In Bleach" video for free on Amazon Prime and followed up with this book, which I couldn't put down once I started it. I don't consider the murder possibility to be a "theory" now, considering the book is based on recorded telephone conversations, documents, and interviews with people who knew Cobain. That's not speculation or story telling; that's recorded voices of people lying, deceiving, hating, planning, people filing false police reports, false media reports, rage, jealousy, etc. I think a better description would be that the book presents a very plausible explanation as to why this man is gone, not a "theory" and certainly not a "conspiracy". Love's "practice sheet" of trying to copy Cobain's handwriting, the fact that someone was trying to use Cobain's credit card up until 15 minutes before his body was found (he had been dead for several days), and the questionable four lines added to his suicide note are all very disturbing. Toss in the fact that another recording between private investigator, Tom Grant and the personal attorney for Love/Cobain confirms that they were divorcing, and that Love was trying to find a way to dissolve the prenup between them, and you'll really start to wonder what's going on. Cobain's new will, which removed Love from inheriting anything, was unsigned at the time of his death. The other two band members confirm that Nirvana had already broken up when Cobain died; without the added four lines to the suicide note, one must consider that the note is actually a note to the FANS, as he was departing the music scene and/or Nirvana at that time. Cobain also had two airline tickets, ready to leave Seattle, but obviously never used them, and was not traveling with Love. Love hangs back in Los Angeles the entire time that Cobain is missing, refusing to actively partake in looking for him, tossing out a variety of media spins and false reports about herself to get attention for her new album, but once his body is found, she returns to Washington state within two hours via private jet. Huh? This is just a bit of the information that came from the many phone recordings and documents that are found in this book. Shame on the police department for proclaiming Cobain's death a suicide the same day that he was found, for NEVER developing the crime scene photos, and for refusing to reopen this case when so much bizarre and suspicious evidence/behavior has been uncovered since Kurt's death. Tom Grant and one other person in this book claim to essentially have the slam dunk evidence for the murder case, but they are refusing to release that information until the FBI steps in and takes over. And they should. Please note that the slam dunk is not in the book, but I did not finish this book feeling like I needed any more information to seriously question the police department declaring this a suicide. Yes, it's a different state and 15 years later, but when Michael Jackson died...THAT is the way to conduct an investigation. Leave no stone unturned before ruling it a natural death, accident, suicide, or homicide. By the end of this book, I found myself feeling very angry and disgusted that the police (or anyone else) can just slap their personally perceived label on another human being (i.e., junkie, homeless, bipolar, whore, druggie, prostitute, drug dealer, teenager, black, white, rockstar, troubled, depressed etc.) and then proceed to quickly dismiss the importance of that person's life, whether the label is true or not, by completely disregarding a proper investigation to find out why that person is now DEAD. I don't care if Cobain used heroin. Couldn't care less! His death deserved a proper and complete police department investigation, just as any other human being; NOT because he was famous, but because the police shouldn't have the power to toss anyone's life value out so quickly. Obviously, this is still a very modern day issue, nothing new really, but certainly infuriating, regardless. And that, in my opinion, is exactly what happened in this botched case: this rush-to-judgment by the police department, and their incredulous ability to believe the false statements and deception coming out of the mouth of this man's wife (because it conveniently supported the label they put on Cobain, and it supported their assumptions, assumptions that were, btw, fed to them by HER) and then promptly tossing the whole thing into the closed case files as if Cobain never mattered, is a complete disgrace. When you're done with this book, Nirvana fan or not, you'll be questioning why SOMEONE out there can't get this case reopened. I do not find the material presented to be fabricated or even far reaching, nor is it one person's opinion. It expands greatly on what was brought up in the "Soaked in Bleach" video. Get this book and make your own decision. I was shocked at how much more information is readily available in the book; the "Soaked in Bleach" video is just a scratch on the surface. Indeed, how DOES a junkie shoot up seven times the lethal dose of heroin, remain conscious, put his personal items away neatly, and retain the ability to properly position a shotgun to commit suicide? And don't fall back on tolerance and heavy abuse, it doesn't hold water. If you think that's the case, then please note that Cobain is the only person on the planet to ever pull it off, which would make him a drug-using superman and an interesting scientific study, too. The book also discusses how Kurt wasn't the only person who was trying to get away from his wife that ended up dead. The bass player for Hole suspiciously died shortly after Cobain (when she announced she was quitting the band, before a big tour started), along with another man who passed a polygraph test, twice stating that he was offered $50K to kill Cobain and "make it look like a suicide"; I'll allow the book to present those stories. Coincidences? How about the fact that the same medical examiner did the autopsies regarding the two dead people mentioned here, declaring their causes of death, and him being a good friend of Love's? Curious? I'm not on the fence about this issue any more. The police need to put their egos aside, reopen the case, and give this a real investigation. Until that happens, there will never be closure as to why this man is gone. The sheer number of copy-cat-suicides in young people since Cobain died should be reason enough for them to do it, even if they still don't give a damn about Cobain. The book consults with multiple experts, who have handled high profile cases that you probably recognize, who state that the photographs of the crime scene would tell all, but Seattle still refuses to develop them. Why? The whole thing is incredibly sad.

China, Russia and World Peace (Part 2)

But back to China:

I don't expect China to do anything stupid, as they never have in modern history, that I'm aware of. No invasions since Tibet, just trying to make their country as prosperous as possible and building peaceful trade relations with other countries. I don't know a lot about the Uyghur situation and so there is probably room for criticism there. Even with their so-called enemies, such as the "5 eyes" countries (USA, the UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada) who think the world should belong to them and who act as their policemen, and who waste hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars that could be used to help the poor, rather than being spent on war machines directed at China and Russia. 

Two countries we should be building friendships with, but being labelled a Putin-apologist is the new outcast label, along with "anti-vaxxer", "right winger", "conspiracy theorist", etc. All labels used to try to make the programmed herd ignore or attack you as enemies of their dark group, which they believe is right and good. The groups, previously labelled as the outsiders, are the "Rebel Alliance" of today, in Star Wars terms. And yes, amongst them are fakes and spies, as in any war, and we must be vigilant and on guard for enemies both from within and without. That's what intuition and a rational mind are for.

As William Cooper the father of the modern truth movement said, "Read everything, listen to everybody, believe nothing unless you can prove it with your own research."

So China, in general, doesn't have a recent history of attacking other countries, but instead it tries to work with them economically and has been successful in this endevour.

Yes, the formation of modern day China was paved with blood (which country wasn't?) and they immorally took control of Tibet, so their government leaders have been no saints, but times are a changing and China's main goal now seems to be economic growth in a peaceful world. Their economy is not based on war like the USA's economy has been since WW2. The USA has remained on war footing, with huge expenditure on weapons, troops and bases all over the world since WW2. Not Russia. Not China. The USA and its allies. They are all great militarists, which they will say is there to protect democracy and freedom in the world. A convenient lie, to use Al Gore's term. We don't need that many nukes, subs, aircraft carriers, etc. It's not WW2 anymore, though some wish it were. And it's these folks who must never have the power to launch a first strike. But I dont think it will allowed anyway 

Humans are evolving, playing in a sandpit of a kind, and there are adults present to make sure we don't overstep the mark in our ignorance and ruin things for everybody.

Back to China

China are not the world power with hundreds of military bases in other countries, supposedly to protect those countries from China? (Or from the "protectors" as an extortion racket? The big bullying the small. An old historical theme.) 

The idea that we need to be afraid of China or Russia or communism for that matter, which no longer exists and never really did, after all... countries are a balance of government and private industry and it is the level of personal freedom, environmental care and social fairness that we need to look at, not just a simple label to vilify the leadership of a country, if they won't play ball with the exploitive western countries and are therefore vilified, attacked economically (including with sanctions), and their leaders are the target of assassinations with the methods becoming more sophisticated every day, to ensure plausible deniability.  Heart attack, cancer, you name it, they can produce it and who can prove who or what started it? But when a number of "problem" leaders fall in a similar way or around the same time for opposing some important element in the western establishment's plans you have to ask: is it another assassination? 

From what I am led to believe these have happened a lot in recent times and some leaders still seeming to hold onto power are actually look alike doubles, with the true leader now dead. This keeps the power structure in place should an assassination be successful.

China, Russia and world peace (Part I)

PART 1

No-one is going to war over Taiwan and there will be no WW3 over that bastion of Illuminati corruption and money laundering, Ukraine. 

Putin does nothing by chance. Like him or loathe him. Believe the stories printed about him by his enemies in the CIA controlled western media or not. They say he kills his political enemies and journalists who are critical. Well, without a trial and access to true information (which is rare), that is speculation, but what we do know is that the western empire he is fighting to maintain sovereignty from have no qualms about killing their enemies and do it with impunity, whenever they get the chance. And killing Putin's "domestic enemies" to make him look like a monster would be straight out of their MO. Who knows? Not I, but I do have a source I trust more than the mockingbird media and then there is intuition, which finely honed cannot be corrupted by the lies of this world. It is a laser arbiter of truth if we approach it in the right way, free of bias and brainwashing. They must be left behind. All thinking, all words gone. Just observation. Body language. It does not lie, unike the voice, particularly in the news media. Very unreliable propaganda generally.

Anyhow, given the popularity of Putin in Russia and other countries, the efforts to destroy his credibility seem to be failing. Some will say his popularity is because his regime controls the media. I think he would still be popular no matter what the media looked like (and all countries whose leadership is opposed by the CIA will be subject to their influence, if there is truly a "free media" anywere it probably exists in only the smallest and most insignificant of nations.  

Also the the fact Russia took in Edward Snowden in sanctuary from the Americans who were trying to capture him so he could be controlled and disappeared from the public discourse and that would be willing to do the same with Julian Assange tells us a lot about which country is under the control of the light and which governments are controlled by darkness. 

The establishment media in the USA and UK laud Bush and Blair as heroes, when both are war criminals, responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and so what side of good and bad the establishment there are on is not difficult to judge. It's not rocket science and billions in sophisticated propaganda doesn't change the facts. They are most obviously the bad guys.

People don't make their decisions blindly, based on the propaganda they receive, instead they have intuition and minds of their own, and many are able to see through the all-pervading deception and get to the heart of matters and into the heart of any soul, and see things as they really are- their true nature and motivation. 

And this perception is very often the opposite to the story told by establishment voices, who themselves are often just as brainwashed as the people they are trying to convince. They have become an apparatchik for the machine of death that they truly believe is good.These are the "useful idiots" of our age.

But if we allow outside propaganda by dubious sources to darken our minds then independent thinking becomes impossible and we become programmable, unthinking, machine-like beings, just the way the power elites like it.

So trusting what the Western Empire media says about any world leader who opposes them is unwise. 

China is also under wiser rulership than the west, even if they may seem overly controlling to the western mind. Still, it is nothing beyond what western governments have done to their own people during the recent "covid crisis", with that basion of western liberalism Melbourne, Australia, being, I believe, the most locked down city in the world during that time, destroying people's businesses, mental health and lives with it. But all "for your public safety" of course. And all under the rule of "Dictator Dan", the Premier of the state. Somehow he reminds me of Mussolini on the inside, but trying to be soft and cuddly on the outside, like a Wiggle, and as fake as a Wiggle too, with their idiotic fake smiles plastered over their faces. Children aren't idiots. They may like the songs playing but they know the performers are fake as hell. It's garish, like ugly cross dresses. Have some taste, please. 😆

Some people will do anything for money. Tell any lie, and in the case of political leaders, destroy any opposition to their draconian policies by the use of their "brown shirt" brigade.

These days this is the "police", the keepers of law and order, no matter how corrupt the person is who's commands they are obeying. This is immoral to give away your free will in this manner. In an interesting side note the Victorian police wear an upside down 5 pointed star, the meaning of which is probably lost to them, but not to the organisation that loves symptoms and from which such thing originate. 

-

See part 2 above.

Why is so little known about the next world?

When people arrive in the next world they are amazed and wonder why they weren't told about it before and why this world, in general, has little or no idea about the next world and how it functions. 

The reality is that many books have been written on the subject which paint a cohesive picture of the world to come, but these books are not widely advertised and that's because it doesn't suit the establishment for people to know the answers to the important questions they answer. Most people only know what the establishment or power elite want them to know and a great deal of that so-called knowledge is false.

The book below is as good as any, but there are many fascinating takes on the world beyond. Given that it is a stratified or layered world where we end up will depend upon how we have lived our lives and the kind of person we have been.

This is not only fair but it's the only way it could work, if the next world is a sanctuary world, as it was originally set up be. It would be no sanctuary if the immoral mixed with the moral, without the agreement of the moral ones. It would be hell, which is a fitting description for the lower levels of the realm, where the low, selfish people go. Like attracts like, more so there than in this world.

But the book below and others like it have far more detail to share than can be fitted in a Facebook post.

https://new-birth.net/other-stuff/books-we-love/books-on-life-after-death/

Rational thinkers and the extraordinary

Some people are proud of the fact that they only believe in "rational" things and not "magical thinking". 

But this is just a limit we place on ourselves and life, which does nothing to enrichen it. It just tends to result in a kind of inner poverty. 

It's wearing blinders, rather than freeing us from the idea that we know everything that is possible. 

Of course we don't, and by staying open to the possibility that there may be more to life than what we can possibly imagine we might just get to experience the extraordinary!

Thoughts about self-described skeptics

The people who label themselves "skeptics" seem to me to be some of the least skeptical people of all. 

I don't call myself a skeptic, because I don't have that level of self-denial. I know I'm biased. And to be a true skeptic that skepticism has to be applied universally. Instead, it tends to be applied to whatever subjects and ideas a person doesn't wish to believe in, while credulousness is applied to those things in which they wish to believe. 

And then there is the "social skeptic", which is a club of like-minded thinkers. They hate cults, yet act as if they are in one. They are all of one mind about crucial matters (to them) and would eject anyone who questions any of their precious dogmas from the group. It's ironic, but I'm sure they don't see the joke.

Any level of self-knowledge would make such folk immediately drop the label "skeptic" and replace it with "true believer", like everybody else.

It's just that their beliefs tend to fit a certain pattern, which to them is "skeptical thought". And this pattern of beliefs makes them feel superior and more intellectual than those who don't share it.

But I think it's fair to say that where there is arrogance (rather than humility) there is also ignorance. For when we are aware of what we don't know, and of our biases, we tend to become more objective in our world view than those who think they already have it all figured out.

Past US presidential candidates

It's no secret why past presidential candidates such as Ron Paul, Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard have gained significant support and have stood out among the other candidates. 

It's because they have spoken a sizeable amount of truth, in some cases about taboo subjects such as the counterproductive nature of many US military actions, which is quite shocking when the other candidates tend to be establishment cut-outs: wind-up dolls speaking the same establishment promoting nonsense. Or, if necessary, promising change in the vaguest of terms, while taking money from the same industries they claim they will bring to heel.

I'm not saying that if any of the candidates named above became president they would be able to create meaningful change. The system is stacked against it. 

Clearly 2 of this list have become president and the deep state seems to have defeated both of them and continued on its merry way.

Tens of billions of dollars in profits depends on things staying as they are. Power structures, once established, can be difficult to move. 

But in time everything changes and rapid change is possible if the people demand it. After all, the rulers are few and the people are many and hold the true power in this world.

The two international poles of power

A bipolar world seems to be better than a unipolar one.

The last thing we need is one group of elites dominating the planet. Two or more groups are likely to be better, as competition for each nation's allegiance will then take place. 

So rather than just bullying, we might see more encouragement between the stronger and weaker nations.

At the moment the two international poles of power seem to be (1) the western nations, controlled by the deep state or cabal, using the US military, NATO, sanctions and economic sabotage as their stick, and (2) the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and other countries now coming on board) who seem more interested in cooperation than intimidation. 

The recent movement away from the use of the US dollar by countries such as Saudi Arabia seems to be indicating a shift in allegiance.

One side appears to be weakening, illustrated by the low quality of the puppet leaders it installs, while the other side seems to be going from strength to strength. 

See Robert F. Kennedy, Jr 's tweet below:.

My criticism of Trump

I have to criticise Trump otherwise people will think I'm a blind Trump lover. 

So here's my criticism: Trump be careful who you take advice from. 

Never allow a deep state dirty rat to infest your thinking with their poison. 

Appoint me as "chief discrimination officer" and I will let you know which ones to trust and who to ignore. It's usually pretty obvious: Fauci and Gates are dirty rats, for example. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr can be trusted. Tulsi Gabbard, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz are trustworthy, to name but a few. It's not rocket science. Bad guys are creepy and lie and almost certainly smell bad. Good guys are lovely and tell the truth and most likely have a more pleasant aroma.

That's if you become president again. 

As for Biden. There's no help possible for his team. They are on the boat of (spiritual) death sailing to the hell realms, through their selfish and evil actions of their own free will. 

Their spirits are dark as the night. Like Hillary. Like George Bush Snr. Satanic captured souls. Lost for half an eternity. Perhaps more?

Below: an accurate picture of Trump, according to the establishment media.

Trump, vaccines, the establishment and war

Whatever Trump says is good the media says is bad. Think Ivermectin- "horse paste". Lol.

That automatic negative reactivity created a conundrum when Trump spruiked "operation warp speed" for the rapid development of covid vaccines.

The establishment adore vaccines. About as much as they adore putting mind numbing fluoride in the water and promoting war. Maybe even more than that. 

It's so cool to have access to putting whatever you want in people's bodies. For their health, of course.

So the one time they couldn't disagree with Trump was with vaccines. 

Maybe it was the second time. The first being after he signed off on the assassination of the Iranian General Qasem Soleimani. 

A cold blooded murder. No trial. 

Just assassination from the air.

Killing is one thing the establishment adore, especially killing their competition and those they can't control.

So they couldn't criticise him for that. In fact, it was almost certainly their operatives who convinced him to do it. So "good onya Trumpy" they thought.

So the establishment love war, stealing from the people, poisoning the people (hello Monsanto and the drug companies- profits AND poisoning- two birds with one stone!) and raping children (Hello Epstein and friends- the tip of the iceberg- read "Trance Formation of America" for more details). They really are a lovely bunch of coconuts!

Is this not common knowledge or are people still pretending the TV and newspapers can be trusted?

Grow up people!

It's time for the earth to eject these monsters and it can only be done if people are willing to take away the blinders from their eyes.

We are not children anymore.

Sometimes the truth hurts.

But an adult faces the truth. They don't put their head in the sand and pretend it isn't so.

So.

War, poisoning the earth, poisoning the people, making huge profits, drugging the people. It's great to be so well treated by "the elites".

Keep up the good work people. 

Believe the lies.

Put your head in the sand.

It's cool and dark there and comfortable for a while.

But beware.

One day you might get a kick up the ass, when you weren't looking!

Thoughts on the death of Kurt Cobain

One thing the "Soaked in Bleach" documentary points out is how much of Kurt Cobain's supposed "suicide note" was likely faked. It started out being a rough draft about how he wanted to leave the music industry and then turned into something completely different and obviously cliched and fake at the end to suggest a suicide. This part was done in completely different handwriting to the earlier parts.

Some months before Kurt's death he stated in a filmed interview that his stomach pain issue that had plagued him for years had been fixed over a year ago by doctors finally discovering the right medication to alleviate it. So no motivation for self-harm there, contrary to the fake part of the "suicide note".

Sure, Kurt was addicted to heroin, but he had the money to buy good quality stuff and no big issues sourcing it, I would imagine. The main problem junkies face is getting hold of and affording their fix. Junkies can live long, healthy, productive lives (think of William Burroughs and Keith Richards) if they can access what they need in good quality. It's the withdrawals, the expense and poor and unreliable drug quality that can wreck and even kill a person and drive them to behave immorally and recklessly.

Many of the stories put in the media after his death came from one source proven to be completely unreliable, as the "Soaked in Bleach" documentary clearly shows. And a previous documentary "Kurt and Courtney" provides a first hand account of someone who was offered $50,000 to carry out a hit on Kurt not long before his death. The actual killer and their accomplices are not known with 100% certainty but there is deep suspicion about one particular man being the one to carry out the evil deed and evidence points to certain others being accomplices and helping cover it up.

Both "Kurt and Courtney" and "Soaked in Bleach" should be watched in succession if you want to know what most likely went down.

At the end of the day it appears Kurt's death was mainly to do with money and who benefited financially from his death. This includes business interests who relied on Kurt's continuing success for their income and also someone close to him whose place in his life and claim to his fortune was about to be severed had he survived.

If someone as successful as Kurt is planning to retire from the music business then that impacts on a number of people's future earnings. Sadly, it seems a dead rock star is worth more than one who is alive, if he no longer wants to play ball with the money men who feed off his creativity.

So a horrific and evil act was probably done for the most banal of reasons and possibility also out of anger, jealousy and an attempt to steal his light and fame.

And what makes it all the worse is the death was set up to look like Kurt took his own life, which led to copycat suicides and gives a false impression of who Kurt really was. Most certainly this was done to avoid any investigation into his death which would have led to the true perpetrators of this grisly and most evil of acts, who were those people who benefited most from his untimely death.