UFOs and the narcissistic intelligence agencies

The intelligence and military agencies are a sick joke, the way they intimidate UFO witnesses into silence.

Why?

Surely not some baloney about stopping the population panicking?

The ETs are clearly far more benevolent than the intelligence agencies are, given the agencies predilection for murder, lies, and withholding the truth.

They think they are the only ones deserving of knowing the truth about certain important matters.

Their egos and narcissism know no bounds.

That and their incredible stupidity.

They are a pox on the human race and just puppets for the Satanic deep state, which makes them traitors and deserving of the death penalty.

Black pilled people

Maybe the black pilled* people are the disinformation agents calling good people controlled opposition. 

Just because a person doesn't tell the whole truth as they believe it to be doesn't make them the bad guy, the controlled opposition. 

Maybe the black pilled people are CIA agents pretending to be "truthers", to sow dissention and lead people astray, and into states of hopelessness. 

In any event, everyone must use their own discernment. 

Nobody should be taken at face value, unless they've proven their humanity and honesty to you personally and  that's pretty rare on the internet.

*Here, black pilled is used to refer to a set of beliefs that trusts no-one and nothing and resigns the believer to nihilism. I'm not referring to any racist or sexist belief, like how the mainstream media use the term.

"Experts"

I'm in a few Facebook groups and one group automatically labels me an "expert". I'm no freaking expert and to tell the truth I don't think experts exist in any but the most simplistic of fields. All that exists are students at best, and at worst, brainwashed drones who think they're experts.

A comment on the ET/UFO phenomenon

I studied the UFO/ET subject years ago as a youth, long before the internet became a thing, using books from libraries and some I purchased.

Even seasoned UFOlogists like Jacques Vallee, on whom the main character of Close Encounters of the Forth Kind was roughly based, are baffled by the phenomena and the often bizarre reports of experiences of contactees.

It seems the Earth is being visited and has been visited by many different types of extraterrestrial. 

At least one, if not more of these groups, have done deals or attempted to do deals with various governments. 

Some types of ET seem selfishly oriented and others more noble in intent.

Some people today of a certain kind of religious bent dismiss all these accounts as interactions with demons.

In reality, demons, apparently, are deceased humans who have sunk to a very low spiritual level.

There is no evidence that they are "fallen angels", despite this being a popular belief.

Nor is there any trustworthy evidence of the existence of a "supreme demon", such as the word Satan or even Lucifer may suggest.

If Lucifer is real then his current location is unknown, as far as I'm aware.

He was said to have led a revolution against God, and this may be so, but how this impacts on humans and the ET phenomenon is unclear.

There is no reason to believe that ETs would believe such a story, which seems to have originated with man.

No doubt they would have their own beliefs, assuming they exist, and one would hope that space travel to inhabited systems only become possible when a population clean up their act on their own planet, so as not to spread their own dysfunction and destructive behaviour elsewhere.

Unfortunately, given the fact that spiritual and technical development do not necessarily occur together, this may not be the case.

However, according to Phillip Krapf's books, which are highly recommended, an overseeing race ensures destructive ET races never get into space, by utilising highly intelligent, peaceful means, that keep such races grounded.

The human race is such a destructive race at the present time, and so we can't expect to go anywhere significant off world anytime soon.

Trust in the establishment is gone.

https://youtu.be/5gmDHw-lO4Q?si=y8WvkdizYlGFtDAM

The internet destroyed trust in the establishment for anyone paying attention.

In the last decade the establishment has attempted to regain control by biasing search engines, taking down or shadowbanning websites, having their teams turn Wikipedia into an establishment bullshit site, reliable only for things that don't undermine establishment lies, etc.

I don't think it's working.

When the establishment of the west support the Israeli regime unreservedly in their continual bombing, destruction and theft of Palestinian people and property how can they be trusted?

Trust in medicine?

Gone.

Trust in media?

Gone.

Trust in government?

Gone.

What remains?

Only trust in those voices that realise the completely untrustworthy nature of the establishment.

The truth about hell

Hell is usually thought of as hot, but according to the most trustworthy accounts I've read the heaven realms are warm and beautiful and as we move closer to what some would call "hell" it gets colder and uglier, and this process continues until we reach the "stuck in the mud" area (see "A Soldier's Story" in "Gone West" by JSM Ward). It's a trip downwards into progressively worse realities. 

Those in the hell realms are there because of what they have become by their own choices and there is always the option to move upwards by accepting a different approach, which often means accepting help from those tasked with visiting such realms, making themselves available to anyone open to receiving help from a lighted being, which seems to a small minority at any one time.

The modern trust dilemma and the importance of optimism

In the first Matrix movie the greatest embodiment of truth is thought to be The Oracle, but by the second film the protagonist, Neo, is already questioning whether she is just another system of control.

This is where many "truthers" find themselves.

Realising the deep and wide levels of deception in the world the question becomes: who or what can be trusted?

Can the senses be trusted?

They can be fooled.

Can logic be trusted?

What about intuition?

Religion, ideology, politics, political leaders and celebrities. 

Books, documentaries, and films.

Who or what to trust?

Are we living in a simulation?

Are we free spiritual beings or are we prisoners who think we are free?

Without a positive outlook our physical and mental health suffers.

We must develop optimism if we don't already possess it.

How that is achieved when we discover dark truths about the world is the real challenge.

Conscious and unconscious creation

Photo credit: Jason Christoff. 

There's a big difference between conscious creation and unconscious creation. 

Both work and bring either pleasure or pain into our lives. 

The problem with unconscious creation is we think we are at the mercy of fate rather than subject to the result of our free will choices.

We co-create our lives with the people around us. 

This has benefits and disadvantages and is a reason why solitude is so important, for as long as it takes for us to become one with our soul level truth again.

Too long spent around others, especially non-believers, materialists or pessimists, is not good for our physical or spiritual health.

The mystery of the existence of evil

I think the existence of evil is one of the most perplexing things for people to comprehend. 

We can talk about free will and some beings choosing to use it in a harmful way, but that still doesn't describe how evil got a foothold, and a major one at that (as in "who is the King of this world" from the Bible) and how something pure and innocent can be intentionally corrupted by an unknown, alien, misunderstood being, group of beings or force.

How did evil turn up in this obviously beautiful universe?

One question is whether the battle between good and evil is just a transitory thing, an earthly thing, and an ultimately unimportant thing, perhaps to assist human evolution, or is it a real spiritual struggle with real stake in the game and no guaranteed outcome?

Evil appears to want to destroy all that is good, noble, pure and natural. It seems to be a force or being that hates God and hates God's creations and wants them all destroyed or under its control. 

I have read convincing reasons why this is the case by the prolific spiritual author Kim Michaels, but I can not say with any certainty that he is correct.

It is just beyond my realm of direct knowing.

Noel Gallagher, Kurt Cobain and conspiracy theories

Noel Gallagher of Oasis fame once was asked in a filmed interview, whether he would be interested in watching a documentary called "Soaked in Bleach", and he asked whether the documentary was "conspiracy stuff".

It's a documentary which deals with the final days of Kurt Cobain's life, including his death, with most of it based on tape recordings made by a private investigator hired by Courtney Love, Kurt's wife, to find her husband (who was clearly avoiding her) after he had gone missing for a short period of time after leaving a detox centre in Los Angeles for heroin addiction.

When Noel was told the film was "conspiracy stuff", Noel said he hated conspiracy stuff and that was that.

For a guy who seems quite intelligent, that is a strange thing to say, considering his interest in Kurt and appreciation of his music, and how common conspiracies are in this world and how important historical events can only be understood through the conspiratorial lens.

It showed a lack of curiosity on Noel's part that I find unusual, considering Noel seems like someone who values knowledge, particularly about musicians he admires, like the Beatles and Nirvana, for example.

But there you go. Was Noel one of those people brainwashed to think conspiracy = nonsense, which is a very childish notion and which helps keep the lid on subjects where the truth being widely shared and understood may not only advance justice in the world, it would bring forward the understanding of the human race of what forces are at play in the world. Which is absolutely essential if we are to progress as  race.

If that's not interesting, then I don't know what is. Maybe just some banal nonsense on the TV or in a newspaper, that he perhaps reads, often designed to manipulate the viewer's emotions and to mislead them.

But that's life. Some people like to wear blinders and put limits on their search for truth. As a result, they often end up far less knowledgeable than they could be and far more  easy to mislead, due to an intentional lack of understanding of how the world really works, behind the illusions designed to fool us.

Consciousness and philosophy

.(A response to a Facebook post denying the existence of mind.)

Is mind being confused with consciousness, here? 

In the Vedas, and many other spiritual teachings, consciousness is the one thing we cannot deny. 

Everything else, such as thoughts and sensations, are objects in consciousness, which would either not exist, or not be known about, were it not for consciousness. 

This is the primary philosophical teaching. 

Western philosophy seems to largely ignore this primary truth, which is why much or all of it will eventually evaporate into the winds.

God and the existence of evil

There is a lot of confusion about evil. 

Some deny it exists and others believe it is a creation of God to test us and to educate and strengthen us.

My own understanding is that neither of these viewpoints are true.

As soon as a being is created with free will the potential for using that will destructively exists.

So evil, from this perspective, is a choice made by a free will being to act destructively, individually or en masse, towards other beings.

Why a being would choose to attempt to control and damage other beings is a big question which requires a detailed answer.

I recommend Kim Michael's books and his website articles for that.

It's been a fascination of his for some time, and his books are very detailed and are the consequence of inspiration, like many writings in the Bible.

To summarise what I'm saying here:

1. God did not create evil, but he created beings with free will that could choose an upward path  or a downward path in evolution.

2. Whether God foresaw how some free will beings would use that free will destructively is beyond my knowledge base. 

I don't necessarily believe God is all knowing, or at least able to predict the outcome of free will choices with certainty. 

That's the whole point of having free will. 

If behaviour could be accurately predicted 100% ahead of time it wouldn't be free will, it would be determinism, which would be like creating an army of robots. 

And that would be boring and pointless.

Without the unexpected there would be very little point to life.

3. By the respecting of free will, even what we would call "evil actions" must be allowed. 

In fact, there may be no way to stop such actions without harming every living thing on the planet.

For example, the great flood in which Noah and his family and a selection of animals (and plants?) survived. 

This was to wipe out the evil (which can mean humankind becoming deeply mired in materialism) which had become out of control and was causing souls to sink into the abyss.

Such circumstances may require the overriding of free will so that a new "playing board" can be created to allow upward spritual growth to happen once again.

Fearing God and cause and effect

I often hear the quote "fear God", but I don't believe it's God we need to fear.

After all, God is all love and mercy.

Instead, what we need to be concerned about is cause and effect. 

This is how we learn. 

There is no punishment, per se, just the outcome of our actions, experienced both here and in the next world. 

How else could we learn, if we never reaped what we sowed? 

In that case we would be able to get away with murder, and this creation would be a madhouse, with no effective governing rules.

Thankfully, that's not how it works, but this fact will upset some, who have acted as if there will be no consequence to what they have done during their lifetime.

Bias on Wikipedia

I think there must be teams that work full-time on contributing to and editing Wikipedia pages to keep them in line with establishment dictated thought.

It's not a coincidence that Wikipedia suffers from philosophical bias. 

In theory, such biases shouldn't exist, because it seems like access to becoming a contributor to Wikipedia is open to anyone. 

But somehow certain group seem to be involving in swaying pages to suit certain viewpoints, and those viewpoints are the ones the establishment try to brainwash everyone with.

That has turned Wikipedia into a misinformation or disinformation site.

Similar to what has become of Google as a search engine.

The internet has been curated to promote prefab establishment ideas and to eliminate or marginalise views that contradict them.

Crop circles and why they are denied

The mainstream media and its adherents treat crop circles as if they are all the work of "dad and Dave", who are some kind of cereal bending geniuses, but for what end?

I don't believe that to be true.

Sure, some crop circles may be man made but I've seen nothing to suggest that they all are.

They often seem to contain some kind of advanced knowledge in symbol form.

A harmless creation to send a message.

For many years the obvious human-ET connection has been be denied by the ruling elite.

To them, open ET-human contact would apparently signal their death knell.

They see our realm as their play thing and they don't want to share it with any one else, particularly any group that is moral and transparent, rather than being secretive and perverse, as they are.

Also, the truth about our existence is their enemy.

The ruling elite rule through deception.

It's a similar story with the monoliths that have appeared and disappeared in natural places around the world in the past few years or so.

I believe they are another signal of a desire for open communication, and suggesting the harmless intention of their creators.

After all, they could have invaded or destroyed us by now with no issues, if they are high tech and malevolent, as Hollywood likes to protray them.

Only ruling class elites and certain religious fanatics see anything sinister in them.

To them, all outside influences are seen as a threat.

They want to protect their selfish control or their narrow world view.

I see hardly any faith in God, in those positions.

Mediocrity in leadership

The mainstream media and its adherents treat crop circles as if they are all the work of "dad and Dave", who are some kind of cereal bending geniuses, but for what end?

I don't believe that to be true.

Sure, some crop circles may be man made but I've seen nothing to suggest that they all are.

They often seem to contain some kind of advanced knowledge in symbol form.

A harmless creation to send a message.

For many years the obvious human-ET connection has been be denied by the ruling elite.

To them, open ET-human contact would apparently signal their death knell.

They see our realm as their play thing and they don't want to share it with any one else, particularly any group that is moral and transparent, rather than being secretive and perverse, as they are.

Also, the truth about our existence is their enemy.

The ruling elite rule through deception.

It's a similar story with the monoliths that have appeared and disappeared in natural places around the world in the past few years or so.

I believe they are another signal of a desire for open communication, and suggesting the harmless intention of their creators.

After all, they could have invaded or destroyed us by now with no issues, if they are high tech and malevolent, as Hollywood likes to protray them.

Only ruling class elites and certain religious fanatics see anything sinister in them.

To them, all outside influences are seen as a threat.

They want to protect their selfish control or their narrow world view.

I see hardly any faith in God, in those positions.

Responsibility for Trump's near assassination

If the Trump shooter was just a brainwashed moron, then responsibility for the near assassination resides in large part with those, particularly in the public eye, who have ridiculously overexaggerated the supposed threat Trump poses to world peace and prosperity if he is re-elected.

Donald J. Trump has already been president once and the sky didn't fall in. 

Why would it fall in if he spent another (brief) 4 years in the White House, now that he understands the (corrupt) system better and can avoid the pitfalls due to his earlier inexperience? 

It wasn't during Trump's term that the horrific terrorist attack occurred in Israel and then Israel's extremist government responded in a predictably more extreme way in response. 

It wasn't during Trump's term that Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine. 

It wasn't during Trump's term that a cost of living crisis emerged. 

So why is it that so many in the media and elsewhere, who really should know better, act as if the sky would fall in if Trump was re-elected?

I just don't get it. 

It seems completely irrational to me.

The use of deception and embedding by dark forces

The dark, destructive and controlling forces on earth don't usually telegraph their existence or their actions, instead they use a variety of means to influence humanity while maintaining some secrecy. Two of these methods used are deception and embedding. 

Deception is straightforward. This is when dark, controlling, or damaging mechanisms, products and services are sold as being good, healthy and natural, or at least nessessary and relatively harmless. This is basically false advertising. 

Embedding is when dark, damaging or controlling substances or mechanisms are embedded within something that has some positive value. Certain organisations are set up this way, such the WHO, the UN, world governments and religions. Also certain technologies contain destructive or controlling elements embedded within them. Examples include the electricity grid and mobile technology, which emanates damaging EMFs, and can be used to surveill the population. Similarly with CCTV cameras. They can be used positively to catch criminals and enhance community safety, or to surveill the law abiding population. 

The use of embedding is to make it difficult to remove the negative quality without destroying the positive quality as well. This also helps to hide the negative quality and make it less susceptible to criticism.

Destructive substances are also embedded in substances useful or necessary for life.

This may include damaging substances contained in foodstuffs, health products, hygiene and cleaning products.

The law is seldom fair

With the thousands upon thousands of laws in modern societies, everybody is a criminal at one time or another. 

Some say it is intentionally set up that way, to make us all vulnerable to prosecution if someone with power wishes to make it so.

Those with the most money or who have connections in high places tend to escape the law and in some cases can literally get away with murder. 

In many countries political opponents of those in power are prosecuted, jailed or worse.

The law is seldom fair in its judgements and in which groups it targets.

It is said the golden rule applies to law making. That is, the people with the gold make the laws and tend to be beyond the reach of the law while the poor are victimised by it.

Laws are often racist and classist in their creation and application, designed to target social groups which the ruling class wish to either control or destroy.

An observation on the Lincoln Memorial

I think the Lincoln Memorial is a fine piece of architecture but that turning Abraham Lincoln into an idol with a huge sculpture in Washington DC is anti-Christian. 

Personalities don't matter to God (Acts 10:34) and so we should not be glorifying them.

It's only actions that count, not the person that does them, and so actions can be lauded but the person carrying them out should not be idolised in any way.

True history, official stories and conspiracies

Many people seem to think that the truth about any given historical event is either "the official story" or a conspiracy theory. 

But in many cases it's just another story that is different to the "official" one. 

There are many reasons why the official account may be false that don't rely on the existence of any widespread conspiracy taking place to hide the truth. 

It may just come from a miscalculation or mistake by reporting bodies or from the lies or misunderstanding of one or more people central to the original telling of the story.

US government spending bills and the western oligarchy's war on Russia

US Federal government spending bills are insane, combining the funding for numerous disparate things into one batch that must be voted "yes" or "no" on. And the system seems designed so that these bills get passed without much debate or anybody reading them.

This bill in the headline below, no doubt includes billions to send to a corrupt regime on Russia's border, to continue a war that was designed to bleed Russia dry, rather than resulting in a final victory for the vassal state.

So why is Russia seen as such a threat to the western oligarchy that they must do all they can to destroy it? How will that advance the world? And is a war with China on the cards, too? 

These people are sick and need to be removed from power if the world is to know peace. The western oligarchy is a sham. A group of lying old men and their ridiculous puppets promoted on their TV networks for the sheep to watch and believe. 

Thankfully, the intelligent ones see through the fog of lies the establishment spins and are able to discern fact from fiction, which gives hope for this world.

What does voting for Nikki Haley in the Republican primary mean?

If people vote for Nikki Haley rather than Donald Trump in the Republican primary does that mean they'll vote for Joe Biden in the Presidential election in November? 

After all, this isn't Republican v Democrat, it's establishment v. non-establishment. And the establishment have been going apesh*t over the non-establishment candidate for about 8 years now. 

Trump really makes the establishment lose their sh*t and it's funny to watch how stupid they reveal themselves to be. For rationally goes out the window when the mind is full of negative emotion, and the establishment's primary emotions seem to be fear and hate. It's what makes their judgement so poor. A sad bunch indeed, backing the wrong team so obviously.

Goals and the subconscious mind

The subconscious works out the direct path to our goal and speaks to us in urges the most efficient way to get there, while the conscious mind works out the convoluted path to our goal that is socially acceptable. 

The gap beyween these two breeds impatience and aggravation. 

The animals don't have to worry about social acceptance, at least not to the same extent as we humans, as so don't suffer these issues and stresses to the same degree.

This is Freud in a nutshell.

No wonder he was addicted to cocaine. 

Instant satisfaction!

The inner war consuming the USA

It's not a presidential election happening in the USA, it's a war that has been fought for several years, or longer. In the process everything has become weaponised, including the justice system and the media. 

That means the end of justice, the end of fair reporting and the end of the USA as it was formerly known. It's now a banana Republic, politically speaking. 

The swamp controls the governing instruments and the supposed fact telling institutions, and so everything is deep state propaganda. 

I don't think they will allow the American people to have a say at the ballot box, unless the election can be rigged in favour of the deep state candidate. The USA is now under fascist control. The illusion of democracy is gone.

The western oligarchy, the JFK assassination and Russia

It's interesting that when the CIA, the mob, Lyndon Johnson (and associates), and God only knows who else, arranged the JFK assassination they also arranged a supposed Russian sympathiser Lee Harvey Oswald to be the patsy to take the blame and so point the finger at Moscow.

These kinds of people don't act on impulse. Everything is planned like clockwork, as was the JFK assassination. 

If this shooter fails, then this one or this one may succeed and finally, given the failure of all initial shooters, the coup de gras was delivered by someone close in front of Kennedy, possibly in the President's car. 

When it was attacked from multiple directions JFK's car was moving slowly in a clear kill zone in Dealy Plaza, Dallas, with many raised areas around from which to shoot. 

The security guards, riding on the President's car were removed at that section of the drive, giving clear access to the President. 

It was as the car moved through this kill zone that multiple shots from multiple positions rang out. 

There were one or two hits, but JFK was still alive, however his back brace hampered his ability to evade the onslaught of shots.

In a final act of desperation, the forces against Kennedy called on (possibly) their last shooter who delivered the kill shot to his right temple with an apparent hollow tipped bullet. This one succeeded and tore through Kennedy's brain, killing him instantly.

Job done for the assassination team. But a near-miss. Relief for the planners and those who benefited and conspired to commit the murder.

Following the assassination Lyndon Johnson became President and escalated the proxy war against the USSR in Vietnam.

Today we see different tactics, but the continuing effort by the western ruling class to undermine the Russian state by funding a proxy war in Ukraine. 

Is it history repeating or just continuing?

All countries must be degraded until they kneel to this western oligarchy.

A mission that is doomed to failure.

The rise of China, alone, makes that an impossibility.

War and dying with honour

Anyone who willingly goes to war and wants to come home alive is playing the wrong game.

War is for those who wish or are happy to be martyred. 

People who believe in spirit often see death (for a cause) as a great honour.

War is for such people. 

Those wanting to avoid death should stay home and, if necessary, hide.

After all, who said you have to fight another man's war to not be considered a coward?

It's not honourable to fight a war for greedy old men, who should do their own dirty work and risk their own life.

It's generally only honourable when you act to save lives, not take them.

But maybe, under certain circumstances, aggression may be demanded, to save the innocent.

Who am I to judge?

Trump, the Ukraine war and the establishment

The Ukraine war* will most likely end almost immediately, if Donald J. Trump is not blocked from becoming next US President. 

So that makes him the peace candidate. 

Trump has a good relationship with Putin, which is wise, and will negotiate a peace deal that Zelensky, or whoever replaces him, will accept. After all, they are dependent on US financial backing for their war effort, so the US can guarantee a settlement.

Trump also managed the economy better than Biden, he advocated for vaccine freedom, and was and is more in control of his faculties than the current President. 

So why do the establishment hate Trump so much?

What do THEY want for humanity?

Endless war with Russia is one.

What else are their lovely goals?

And why are the "elites" building bomb shelters for themselves?

-

*Where peace talks have been rejected outright by the west through their puppet Zelensky, and funding for the continuing war is coming from the US government. More Federal Reserve money printing madness, no doubt.

For freedom?

Do anyone seriously believe that?

Are ETs demons and why would friendly ETs be watching us?

(Written in response to a comment that ETs are demons an that there would be no reason friendly ETs to be watching us.)

Studying other cultures is an interesting pursuit and we may pose a burgeoning threat to galactic peace. We show by our space program that we are looking for intergalactic friendship, yet aggressive factions with power still operate on earth. It's logical to keep an eye on us. Read Philip Krapf's books. 

But I'm not saying all beings, physical or interdimensional, are friendly, but clearly there is no desire to harm us from ETs. They've been watching us since we exploded the atom bomb (and maybe before) as that's when we became a rising threat, with no Hollywood style military attack on us by them, films made to intentionally generate fear of ETs. Ask yourself "why generate this fear"?

Low vibrational beings from lower dimensions are another matter. A normal person can't be harmed by them, because their vibration is too high for any connection. Like attracts like. Vibrations need to be in accord to connect. Only very low humans can connect with them and try to use them for power. Hitler was an example. Netanyahu is probably another. It's been a common theme amongst amoral power mongers to do whatever they can to increase their influence. Many would be unconscious of their connection, but some are not.

Was Hitler channelling low spirits?

It's widely believed among spiritualists that Hitler was possessed by lower dimensional entities ("spirits") when he gave his impassioned talks. It's thought the source of his initial burst of power that saw him rise to political control of Germany while later degenerated in drugs abuse (he was being injected with amphetamines and other drugs in his later days) that fuelled his increasing paranoia and even insanity. 

Going in Russia stupidly, at the wrong time of the year even. What was up there? The spirits got it wrong or he wasn't listening? Did he lose his demonic connection?

Russia won the war. The western front was more of a cake walk. The eastern front, particularly Stalingrad, was the blood bath that destroyed the German army at the cost of millions of Russian lives. 

Russia is the biggest hero of WW2 on a national level, paying the highest price in lives, and ironically (or not) after the horrors of Bolshevism, now Russia is leading the free nations of the world again.

Free, in that the western control grid some call the Matrix, the Cabal or the deep state (but who knows who pulls the strings, as everything is kept hidden at the highest levels of the control pyramid) are yet to gain control of them.

Why "Born Sandy Devotional"?

It's an album cover by an Australian band called The Triffids that has been seen by many, especially in hindsight, as an Australian rock classic. It contains strong undertones of longing and nostalgia for a lost, innocent past. 

Born Sandy Devotional refers to the lead singer, David McComb, I believe, and his upbringing in Western Australia, a dry land, where most of the population hugs the coast and the Swan River that runs through the main city of Perth.  

Much summer life revolves around the river and beaches in Perth and neighbouring towns to the south. Hence "Born Sandy".

The "Devotional" part of the album title I believe refers to songwriter, David McComb's nature, as a devotional man. Devotion to his lover(s), I believe, is what is being referred to, rather than a religious belief. Although I suspect he may have been of Irish decent and had a Catholic upbringing. Devotion seems central to Catholicism, whether to Mother Mary or Jesus, I'm not sure. But this is speculation on my behalf. 

One track that includes some of these themes:

https://youtu.be/dGP6fmpIxt0?si=spMd55G8wXSmPwgq

Various school teacher's advice that I remember...

PART I

I've received a few pieces of good advice from teachers in primary, secondary and tertiary school. 

The kindest and most confidence building one came from my grade 5 teacher, Mr Foster, when he chose me as class captain and briefly extolled my virtue, whatever that happened to be. 

I had never seen myself as a leader. I was quite shy when young. It was nice to be recognised. I enjoyed the few tasks I had to perform, oftrn in public places. It brought me into more contact with other students, which I enjoy. I was a diligent and friendly student, but generally a quiet one.

Pic by Alastair Graham, Gate Appreciation Society, courtesy of Lantana Lane.

The second advice, which I think of most often, was in written form: "10-1/10. Too verbose" written in red pen, on the top of the front page of a too-long winded 10-page economics essay.

The essay was commissioned and marked by the impressive and busy Dr Hocking, a rare successful straddler of the business and academic worlds.

Part II

The third critique was by the one-day to be a powerful and successful environmental campaignist amd eventual political leader of the Australian Greens Party, Christine Milne.

She was my long-time English teacher and she warned against me being greedy, or not giving, as best I can express it. They are not her words, just my understanding of what she said.

The final criticism of remembrance, bar one atrocity not to be mentioned here, was given as a rebuke a few times by the inimitable Mr Ewbank.

That sharp rebuke was "shut up, Todd", or words to that effect. 

I plead innocent, yet guilty.

What would happen would inevitably be: my class neighbour would talk to me during a lesson and I would respond, to not cause social offense, and Mr Ewbank would sharply call me out on it.

It seems like it's always the one who responds who gets in trouble. Like in a dispute.

On a a more humorous note, in the same class, where entertainment was mostly lacking, the infamous Desmond Garrigan, comedian, soccer devotee and overall swell guy, had the habit of intensely getting under Mr Ewbank's skin. You could call him the class clown or entertainer. Good value.

One day, Des, leaning back on his chair, with only 2 of the 4 legs on the ground, and probably not greatly involved with the lesson being taught was called out harshly by the teacher, who demanded he immediately get off his chair and hold it above his head. After several minutes of this he was asked by Mr Ewbank: what has he learnt?

Answer from Des: "That chairs are heavy."

Freedom fighter to the end.

Why some men die young

When men lose in love they sometimes die, through a kind of death wish or evensuicide. It's not uncommon. 

There are others, seemingly happy in their relationship, but still having some kind of deep existential angst. They may also die. 

But do young, happy people die? 

Occasionally, it would seem. 

But when relatively young people die it seems to be mostly self-willed by reckless or even deadly behaviour. 

Examples: reckless driving, high risk sports, heavy drug use, especially alcohol or hard drugs, lack of physical movement, persistent negative thinking, pessimism.

But some, who fail to find a happy partnership can still find happiness, through many channels, mostly involving helping others or by being deeply creative.

Pic of David McComb, lead singer of legendary Australian 1980's rock group The Triffids.

https://youtu.be/d52LKRhBAXo?si=GOFYYvospgtMumGm

Why I joined Tucker Carlson and what I believe

II just paid 100A$+ to join the Tucker Carlson  Network for a year. I think it's good to support independent journalism that you respect. It's so rare these days. 

The big fibbers have the MSM, Google, Facebook and most government and NGOs on their side, whether through choice or (not-so-secret)* threat.

So to the know-nothings I'm now definitely "far-right", whatever that means.

But I will say what my political beliefs really are:

-No war, unless a last resort or necessary to remove Illuminati (the western global control grid) influence. Example Ukraine. Not Gaza. Which is a war crime and genocide. This isn't excusing the horrific terror attacks on Israel, but we need to look deeper at who is creating this havok and carnage and why? For example who has funded Hamas and why? How did the attackers breach Israeli security, given the global surveillance state, apparently so easily? Etc.

-Personal freedom respected, absolutely. 

-No drug laws, only behaviour laws. I.e. no attacking others or driving dangerously.

-use public funds to help those who need it and to help build society, not surveil the public, fight greed- and control- based, falsely sold, foreign wars, or any other of that dark control state nonsense.

*See Edward Snowden.

Why I joined Tucker Carlson and what I believe

I just paid 100A$+ to join the Tucker Carlson  Network for a year. I think it's good to support independent journalism that you respect.

So to the know-nothings I'm now definitely "far-right", whatever that means.

But I will say what my political beliefs really are:

-No war, unless a last resort or necessary to remove Illuminati (the western global control grid) influence. Example Ukraine.

-Personal freedom respected, absolutely. 

-No drug laws, only behaviour laws. I.e. no attacking others or driving dangerously.

-use public funds to help those who need it and to help build society, not surveil the public, fight greed based, falsely sold, foreign wars, or any of that other dark control state nonsense.

Truth tellers who go big publicly

Anyone with a public profile who's pro-truth and pro- freedom and pro- the good guys and against the bad guys will be surveilled heavily by the control web (dark) agents and may find themselves under attack. 100's of dark agents were assigned to destroy Julian Assange, his organisation and its influence. 

The bad guys still have a lot of money to harass people and destroy their lives. The US Federal Reserve Bank just keeps printing it, damaging long-term economic stability. Once the money dries up they will disappear. They're just like puppets of the control state, human NPCs. Their soul is so shrinking, it's light is almost extinguished. 

That's what working for the control grid does. It makes human robots out of once feeling beings.

The nature of the Matrix or control grid

Andrew Tate calls it "the Matrix". Some call it "the Western Empire" or "Western oligarchy" or "Western Hegemony" or the Cabal or Illuminati. 

I think the word "global control grid" sums it up well.  It's tentacles are spread from Europe and the USA through a form of colonisation, which includes the actions of the Illuminati/Cabal controlled UN and WHO, which have had drastic impacts over much of the globe. 

The sooner this control grid collapses or morphs into something truly positive and liberating, if that's possible, the better.

Hashish, opium and the free people

Hashish is a gateway drug to opium. Both of which are freely available amongst the small groups of free people who grow both for medicine, those people we call called tribes, those inventive people living away from the global Illuminati control web. The control web can't reach everywhere. They don't have the manpower. 

May the dissolution of the control grid happen sooner rather than later. Fairness and freedom are the true human inheritance. Not being shackled by so called "authorities". They are authorities in following the orders of spiritually dead men. They are lost souls. Their hell is being created unconsciously, but inevitably, from following the immoral orders of the world would-be masters. Masters of deception only, also hell bound, for sure.

Trump, the covid psyop and Operation Wardspeed

Operation warpspeed was a sucker punch to the idiots behind the covid psyop. It worked on a few levels. 

It prematurely forced the hands of the evil machinators, rushing their judgements which they hate, as they love to do everything in their own time, so that what is planned decades in advance, and is planned to unfolded a step at a time, in a predetermined pattern, was blown to smithereens. And so it threw their plans in a flurry. So fuck them, #1. 

And it made idiotic reactionaries, who worship establishment media, have to decide whether to Hate Trump or whether to Hate the new Trump vaccines. So fuck them #2. 

This would be like forcing Richard Dawkins to love both religion and love corporate science. It would blow his little black and white thinking brain, like Trump's hating reactionaries were.l blown by not know whether to assize on vaccines or Trum So (joke and) fuck them #3. 

Also, Trump has never claimed to be against vaccines. He's just aware of how many staff member's babies had been damaged by them and so he stated his own opinion, which is legal in a free country, if that's what it truly is.

Are ETs demons?

Is it only flat earthers that believe extraterrestrials are demons in disguise? 

It seems like such a backwards, medieval way to look at things. Not to mention incredibly pessimistic and showing a terrible regard for God. They made Him seem so small and pathetic. I just put it down to people possessing a small minded fear. Like small town thinking or like how a secluded stone age tribe on an island resort to attacking any visitors to their island. Obviously the visitors are demons and must be killed. It's the same limited, fear-based mental pattern. And what if they're wrong? Think of what could be gained from communication and cooperation with a society of beings far advanced spiritually and technically from our own? Or do they think God only created one planet and one dominant species to rule it? Although this is incredibly limiting it is theoretically possibile and it's belief make humans feel more important, which is an ego thing, but I think it hugely unlikely. And that's a good thing. If the soul is immortal they're had better be myriad worlds for it to experience, otherwise a deep bordem mady set in. In which case an eternity would be a very long time to endure.

My belief in an afterlife

My belief in an afterlife is not based on any religious belief, it's based on thousands of written and spoken accounts. This makes me wonder: how many atheists believe in an afterlife? Or do they all expect personal extinction upon death? Some speak of living on through their children. This is silly to me. Nobody lives on through their children. Your consciousness either continues to exist after the flesh suit is layed aside or it does not. What happens to your children is their business and if you are not conscious to know it then it's not real to you. That is just common sense. Anything else is irrational, pollyanna thinking.

Global covid tyranny used the classic scam template

A few years ago I was nearly scammed over the phone and I learned first-hand, in some detail, how the process works. First there is the injection of fear, before "authorities" lead you up to the end goal- the theft of your money. In the process you are made to feel guilty and wrong for questioning the validity of what you are being told. It is emotional manipulation all the way.

And then came the "covid pandemic" and I saw this scam template being played out on a global scale. 

I am not saying there was no novel virus or that millions weren't killed by it. But I am saying the whole process was conducted like an A1 scam, using the exact same template as the scammers on the phone, first injecting fear, introducing authorities telling you what to do and making you feel guilty for questioning the narrative. This time the end goal was not the stealing of money but rather the injecting of a novel medicine into the body using mRNA technology.

Well, I didn't do it.

To be honest I couldn't understand why anyone would take such a risk with a new technology and I can't understand why anyone still trusts the establishment after all their lies in the last recent decades.

I gave up believing in fairytales a long time ago, such as that the establishment is trustworthy, but clearly many have not.

The bizarre case of establishment serving "Christians"

One thing I find bizarre is people who claim to be Christians and yet have sold their soul to the devil by promoting the various evil agendas of the establishment. I realise many of these people are career liars but there seems to be some who actually believe that they can serve Satan and still be a Christian. Bizarre. You can't be pro-establishment and be a Christian. It's just not possible. That's unless you are incredibly stupid. Then anything is possible, in the mind of the deeply deluded. But what of the seemingly intelligent ones? What in heaven's name is going on there? Just good liars or instead in deep denial of what they are actually doing and who they are actually serving? I just wonder what mental gymnastics such folks engage in. It makes no sense to me.

Truth and AI

AI depends on the input fed in. Garbage in = garbage out. That's why I have no faith in it because the world is awash with lies, including those things "commonly agreed upon". It takes a human being with a heightened sense of discernment, life experience, ability to read body language and a broad range of intellectual knowledge to sort the wheat from the chaff. Like Barry Long used to say: "all I speak is truth and love" and that's what I aspire to. I will never seek it in a godless, soulless machine, programmed by God knows who. Certainly not by Google, Wikipedia or the government, that's for sure. They are riddled with lies and half-truths.

How the elites control the population

The elites control large segments of the population by brainwashing, bribery and threats. So they depend on propaganda and illegally gained vast sums of money to "encourage" people to do their bidding. Their greatest enemies are those who care more about truth than money or fitting in. It is this group they attempt to turn their brainwashed minions against. For if the whole population woke up and saw the elitists for what they truly are they would be finished in a day.